Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T20:08:01.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiology and outcome of sepsis in a tertiary-care hospital in a developing country

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2005

M. D. TANRIOVER
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
G. S. GUVEN
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
D. SEN
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
S. UNAL
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
O. UZUN
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Sepsis continues to have a substantial mortality and morbidity despite advances in the diagnosis and management of this condition. We retrospectively analysed hospital charts of patients diagnosed to have sepsis between January 2002 and June 2003. Demographic characteristics of patients, microbiological findings and predictors of survival were evaluated. Sixty-nine sepsis episodes that occurred in 63 patients were analysed. The most common underlying diseases were hypertension, malignancies and diabetes mellitus. Renal insufficiency, respiratory distress and disseminated intravascular coagulation developed in 52·2, 30·4 and 30·4% of the episodes respectively; 47·7% of the blood cultures yielded an organism. Gram-negative bacteria were the predominant microorganisms (65·9%). Fifty-five patients (87·3%) died. Mechanical ventilation and underlying renal disease were significant determinants of mortality. In conclusion, Gram-negative bacteria remain the major pathogens in sepsis. The mortality remains very high, and a change in the clinical approach to the septic patient should be employed to improve the outcome.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press