Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:11:45.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epidemiology and control of an outbreak of typhoid in a psychiatric institution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

K. T. Goh ,
S. H. Teo ,
L. Tay  and
E. H. A. Monteiro
K. T. Goh
Affiliation:
Quarantine and Epidemiology Department, Ministry of the Environment, 40 Scotts Road, Singapore0922
S. H. Teo
Affiliation:
Woodbridge Hospital
L. Tay
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Singapore General Hospital
E. H. A. Monteiro
Affiliation:
Communicable Disease Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An outbreak of typhoid caused by Salmonella typhi of the same Vi-phage type (D1) and of the same antibiogram was reported in a large psychiatric institution in Singapore. A total of 95 (4·8%) of the 1965 inmates were infected, 47 with symptoms and 48 asymptomatic. Transmission was through close person-to-person contact and not through contaminated food or water. The source of infection could not be established. The outbreak was brought under control by maintaining a high standard of environmental sanitation, active search for fever and diarrhoeal cases, identification of asymptomatic cases by rectal swabbing, and isolation of those found to be infected. Mass immunization with two doses of heat-phenol inactivated typhoid vaccine was also carried out concurrently. The vaccine was found to have an efficacy of 65·8% in preventing clinical illness.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 108 , Issue 2 , April 1992 , pp. 221 - 230
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

References

REFERENCES

1.Goh, KT. Epidemiological surveillance of communicable diseases in Singapore. Tokyo. Southeast Asian Medical Information Center. 1983; 56–88.Google Scholar
2.Goh, KT. Imported communicable diseases in Singapore. Ann Aca Med Singapore 1984; 13: 127–35.Google Scholar
3.Rice, PA, Baine, WB, Gangarosa, EJ. Salmonella typhi infections in the United States 1967–1972; increasing importance of international travellers. Am J Epidemiol 1977; 106: 160–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Moore, N, Perry, EL, Chard, ST. A survey by the sewage swabs method of latent enteric infection in an urban area. J Hyg 1952; 50: 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Koh, TS, Goh, KT. Enteric fever surveillance in Singapore. Sing Med J 1976; 17: 32–7.Google Scholar
6.Bauer, AW, Kirby, WMM, Sherris, JC, Turck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardised single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45: 493–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Anderson, ES, Williams, REO. Bacteriophage typing of enteric pathogens and staphylococci and its use in epidemiology. J Clin Pathol 1956; 9: 94–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Craigie, K, Felix, A. Typing of typhoid bacilli with Vi-bacteriophage. Lancet 1947; i: 823–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Yew, FS, Chew, SK, Goh, KT, Monteiro, EHA, Lim, YS. Typhoid fever in Singapore: a review of 370 cases. J Trop Med Hyg 1991; 94: 352–7.Google Scholar
10.Naylor, GRE. Incubation period and other features of food-borne and water-borne outbreaks of typhoid fever in relation to pathogenesis and genetics of resistance. Lancet 1983; i: 864–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hornick, RB, Greisman, SE, Woodward, TE, DuPont, HL, Dawkins, AT, Snyder, MJ. Typhoid fever: pathogenesis and immunologic control. New Engl J Med 1970; 283: 739–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Christie, AB. Typhoid and paratyphoid fevers. In: Infectious diseases: epidemiology and clinical practice. 4th ed.New York: Churchill Livingston. 1987; 100–64.Google Scholar
13.Benavente, L, Gotuzzo, E, Guerra, J, Grados, O, Guerra, H, Bravo, N. Diagnosis of typhoid fever using a string capsule device. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1984; 78: 404–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Chau, PY, Tsang, RSW. Vi serology in screening of typhoid carriers: improved specificity by detection of Vi antibodies by counterimmunoelectrophoresis. J Hyg 1982; 89: 261–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lanata, CF, Levine, MM, Ristori, C et al. , Vi serology in detection of chronic Salmonella typhi carriers in an endemic area. Lancet 1983; ii: 441–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Moss, KG, Fulmer, HS, Deuschle, KW. The present status of typhoid carriers in Kentucky. Arch Environ Hlth 1967; 14: 407–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Eisinger, AJ, Smith, JG. Acute renal failure after TAB and eholera vaccination. BMJ 1979; 1: 381–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Joo, I. Benefit versus risk factors in cholera and typhoid immunisation. International Symposium on Immunisation: benefit versus risk factors. Brussels 1978. Develop Biol Standard 1979; 43: 47–52.Google Scholar
19.Acharya, IL, Lowe, CU, Thapa, R et al. , Prevention of typhoid fever in Nepal with the Vi capsular polysaccharide of Salmonella typhi. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 1101–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Levine, MM, Ferreccio, C, Black, RE, Germanier, R. Chilean Typhois Committee. Large-scale field trial of Ty21a live oral typhoid vaccine in enteric-coated capasule formulation. Lancet 1987; i: 1049–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Yugoslav Typhoid Commission. A controlled field trial of the effectiveness of acetone-dried and inactivated and heat-phenol-inactivated typhoid vaccines in Yugoslavia. Bull WHO 1964; 30: 623–30.Google Scholar
22.Aschcroft, MT, Morrison-Ritchie, J, Nicholson, CC. Controlled field trials in British Guyana school children of heat-killed phenolised and acetone-killed lyophilised typhoid vaccines. Am J Hyg 1964; 79: 196–206.Google Scholar
23.Cvjetanovic, B, Uemura, K. The present status of field and laboratory studies of typhoid and paratyphoid vaccines, with special reference to studies sponsored by the World Health Organisation. Bull WHO 1965; 32: 29–36.Google Scholar