Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:28:45.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epidemic Kerato-Conjunctivitis—An Adenovirus Infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. G. Sommerville
R. G. Sommerville
Affiliation:
Virus Laboratory of the University Departments of Bacteriology and of Infectious Diseases, Ruchill Hospital, Glasgow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Two strains of adenovirus Type 3 were isolated from fifty-nine patients suffering from epidemic kerato-conjunctivitis. Serological examination of a further group of fifty-nine patients revealed that neutralizing antibody to adenovirus Type 8 usually developed when the duration of the disease exceeded 14 days, and that at the same time a smaller number of patients also developed low titre neutralizing antibody to Type 3 adenovirus. From the evidence presented it is suggested that adenovirus Type 8 was the infecting organism in the majority of cases, and that when neutralizing antibody to Types 3, 6 or 7 adenovirus was present this probably represented a non-specific effect of stimulation by a heterotypic strain of adenovirus. Insignificant antibody titres by C.F. tests were frequently associated with high titres of neutralizing antibody hi the late convalescent phase of the illness.

I would like to express my gratitude for assistance in obtaining material for the investigation to the following clinicians: Dr J. Winning, Dr J. Marshall, Dr A. Mellick and Dr A. M. W. Thomson of the Eye Infirmary, Glasgow, and to Dr E. McNaught of the Ophthalmic Institution, Glasgow; for supplies of adenovirus seed to Dr B. E. Andrews, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale and Dr D. A. J. Tyrrell, Virus Research Laboratory, Sheffield; and for technical assistance to C. McLean, F.I.M.L.T., H. G. Carson, F.I.M.L.T. and J. Kerr.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , March 1958 , pp. 101 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1958

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, B. E. & McDonald, J. C. (1957). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 50, 753.Google Scholar
Balducci, D., Zaiman, E. & Tybbell, D. A. J. (1956). Brit. J. exp. Path. 37, 205.Google Scholar
Bell, J. A., Rowe, W. P., Engler, J. I., Parrott, R. H. & Huebner, R. J. (1955). J. Amer.med. Ass. 157, 1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jawetz, E.Hanna, L., Kimura, S. J. & Thygeson, P. (1956). Amer. J. Ophthal. 41, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jawetz, E., Kimura, S. J., Hanna, L., Coleman, V. R., Thygeson, P. & Nicholas, A. (1955). Amer. J. Ophthal. 40, 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jawetz, E., Thygeson, P., Hanna, L., Nicholas, A. & Kimura, S. (1956). Proc. Soc. exp.Biol., N.Y., 92, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormsby, H. L., Fowle, A. M. C. & Cockeram, A. (1955). Can. med. Ass. J. 73. 710.Google Scholar
Sommerville, R. G. (1957). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 50, 757.Google Scholar