Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:11:08.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus: III. Evaluation of antibodies after infection and vaccination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

C. Hamblin ,
R. P. Kitching ,
A. I. Donaldson ,
J. R. Crowther  and
I. T. R. Barnett
C. Hamblin
Affiliation:
Department of Virus Diagnosis, Institute for Animal Disease Research, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF
R. P. Kitching
Affiliation:
Department of Virus Diagnosis, Institute for Animal Disease Research, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF
A. I. Donaldson
Affiliation:
Department of Virus Diagnosis, Institute for Animal Disease Research, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF
J. R. Crowther
Affiliation:
Department of Virus Diagnosis, Institute for Animal Disease Research, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF
I. T. R. Barnett
Affiliation:
Department of Virus Diagnosis, Institute for Animal Disease Research, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Investigations using a liquid-phase blocking sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the measurement of antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) in sera from sheep and from cattle are reported, and results compared with those obtained by virus neutralization (VN) tests.

Serum antibody titres in sheep after primary vaccination and in cattle challenged with a natural aerosol after vaccination were similar by ELISA and VN. However, the antibody levels detected in sera of cattle during early infection and of vaccinated cattle after intradermolingual challenge were clearly greater by ELISA than by VN.

The ELISA titres in cattle sera following synthetic peptide vaccination indicated some relationship to protection and were clearly different from those recorded by VN. On the other hand, the antibody levels following conventional vaccination showed that ELISA and VN titres in cattle sera were related to protection. Although there was a good agreement between the ELISA antibody titre and protection for the four vaccines used, by VN the titre which afforded protection varied depending on the vaccine used.

The ELISA was considered therefore to be more reliable than the VN and may prove useful for evaluating the immunological response of animals following infection and following vaccination.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 99 , Issue 3 , December 1987 , pp. 733 - 744
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

References

REFERENCES

Bauer, K., Lorenz, R. J. & Wittmann, G. (1975). Untersuchungen zur Abhängigkeit zwikschen Immunität und Hohe der Neutralisationstiter bei Schweinen nach Impfung mit Maul- und Klauenseuche- (MKS-) Vakzinen. Archives of Virology 49, 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, L., Francis, M. J., Rweyemamu, M. M., Umehara, O. & Boge, A. (1984). The relationship between serum antibody titres and protection from foot-and-mouth disease in pigs after oil emulsion vaccination. Journal of Biological Standardisation 12, 379–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DiMarciii, R., Brooke, G., Gale, C., Cracknell, V., Doel, T. & Mowat, N. (1986). Protection of cattle against foot-and-mouth disease by a synthetic peptide. Science 232. 639–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, A. I., Gibson, C. F., Oliver, R., Hamblin, C. & Kitching, R. P. (1987). Infection of cattle by airborne foot-and-mouth disease virus: minimal doses with O1 and SAT 2 strains. Research and Veterinary Science. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferris, N. P. & Donaldson, A. I. (1984). Serological response of guinea-pigs to inactivated 146s antigens of foot-and-mouth disease virus after single or repeated inoculations. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International des Epizooties 3, 563–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golding, S. M., Hedger, R. S., Talbot, P. & Watson, J. (1976). Radial immunodiffusion and serum neutralisation techniques for the assay of antibodies to swine vesicular disease. Research in Veterinary Science 20, 142–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamblin, C., Barnett, I. T. R. & Hedger, R. S. (1986) A new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus. I. Development and method of ELISA. Journal of Immunological Methods 93, 115–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamblin, C., Barnett, I. T. R. & Crowther, J. R. (1986). A new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of antibodies against foot-and-mouth disease virus. II. Application. Journal of Immunological Methods 93, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Have, P. & Jensen, M. H. (1983). Detection of antibodies to FMDV type Ol by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Report of the Session of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Lelystad, Netherlands, Sept. 1983. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Appendix viii, 44–51.Google Scholar
Kärber, G. (1931). Beitrag zur kollektiven Behandlung pharmakologischer Reihenversuche. Archiv für Experimenlelle Pathologie Pharmakologie 162, 480–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackowiak, C., Lang, R., Fontaine, J., Camand, R. & Petermann, H. G. (1962). Relation entre titre d'anticorps neutralisants et protection des animaux après vaccination antiaphteuse. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur 103, 252–261.Google Scholar
Martin, W. B. & Chapman, W. G. (1961). The tissue culture colour test for assaying the virus and neutralizing antibody of foot-and-mouth disease and its application to the measurement of immunity in cattle. Research in Veterinary Science 2, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pay, T. W. F., Hingley, P. H., Radlett, P. J., Black, L. & O'Reilly, K.J. (1983). The correlation of 140S antigen dose with the serum neutralizing antibody response and with protection from challenge induced by FMD vaccines. Report of the Session of the Research Group of the Standing Technical Committee of the European Commission for the Control of Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Lelystad, Netherlands, sept. 1983. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, Appendix ix, 52–53.Google Scholar
Sutmoller, P. & Vieira, A. (1980). The relationship of neutralizing antibody titres for foot-and-mouth disease virus and the protection of cattle. Boletin del Centro Panamericano de Fiebre Aflosa 39–40, 57–62.Google Scholar