Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:44:25.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enumeration of Streptococcus faecalis, with particular reference to polluted waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

L. A. Allen ,
Margaret A. F. Pierce  and
Hazel M. Smith
L. A. Allen
Affiliation:
Water Pollution Research Laboratory, Langley Road, Watford, Herts
Margaret A. F. Pierce
Affiliation:
Water Pollution Research Laboratory, Langley Road, Watford, Herts
Hazel M. Smith
Affiliation:
Water Pollution Research Laboratory, Langley Road, Watford, Herts
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Factors affecting the growth of Streptococcus faecalis on glucose-yeast extract-sodium azide agar have been studied. Both the high temperature of incubation used (45° C.) and the presence of azide reduced the proportion of cells able to form colonies, the inhibitory action being much more marked with cultures which had become attenuated, either through age or through prolonged immersion in water, than with comparatively young and vigorous cultures. This inhibitory action was found to be largely overcome if the inoculum was subjected to a preliminary period of ‘resuscitation’, by incubating it with double-strength glucose broth before adding the azide-agar portion of the medium and allowing the mixture to set.

Neutral red was so inhibitory to some strains of Str. faecalis that it could not be included in the medium. Phosphate, as the potassium salt at a concentration of 0.7%, if autoclaved with the remaining constituents of the medium, exerted a depressing effect on the counts. Added separately it showed no inhibitory action.

The spinning-bottle technique (Allen et al. 1952) was adapted for Str. faecalis. When used for samples containing a mixed flora the method, described in the Appendix, permitted the growth only of Str. faecalis.

This paper is published by permission of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , December 1953 , pp. 458 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

References

Allen, L. A., Brooks, E. & Williams, I. L. (1949). Effect of treatment at the sewage works on the numbers and types of bacteria in sewage. J. Hyg., Camb., 47, 303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, L. A., Grindley, J. & Brooks, E. (1953). Some chemical and bacteriological characteristics of bottom deposits from lakes and estuaries. J. Hyg., Camb., 51, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, L. A., Pasley, S. M. & Pierce, M. A. F. (1952). Conditions affecting the growth of Bacterium coli on bile salts media. Enumeration of this organism in polluted waters. J. gen. Microbiol. 7, 257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, H. J. & Gibbons, N. E. (1950). Enterococci as an index of faecal contamination. Canad. J. Res. F, 28, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, E. & Allen, L. A. (1953). Improved methods for determining the Most Probable Numbers of Bacterium coli and of Streptococcus faecalis. J. Hyg., Camb., 51, 468.Google ScholarPubMed
Dible, J. H. (1921). The Enterococcus and the faecal streptococci; their properties and relations. J. Path. Bact. 24, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, R. L. & Fuller, J. E. (1940). Coliform bacteria and streptococci in swimming-pool water. Amer. J. publ. Hlth, 30, 1059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hajna, A. A. & Perry, C. A. (1943). Comparative study of presumptive and confirmative media for bacteria of the coliform group and for faecal streptococci. Amer. J. publ. Hlth, 33, 550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannay, C. L. & Norton, I. L. (1947). Enumeration, isolation and study of faecal streptococci from river water. Proc. Soc. appl. Bact. no. 1, p. 39.Google Scholar
Houston, A. C. (1910). The results of the examination of the raw river waters (Thames, Lea, and New River) for faecal streptococci. Metropolitan Water Board, 5th Report on Research Work.Google Scholar
Houston, A. C. (1931). A coli cum streptococcus test for waters. Metropolitan Water Board, 26th Annual Report on the Results of the Chemical and Bacteriological Examination of the London waters.Google Scholar
Houston, A. C. (1932). A Coli cum streptococcus test. Metropolitan Water Board, 27th Annual Report on the Results of the Chemical and Bacteriological Examination of the London waters.Google Scholar
Ingram, M. (1952). Internal bacterial taints (‘Bone Taint’ or ‘Souring’) of cured pork legs. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maccallum, W. G. & Hastings, T. W. (1899). A case of acute endocarditis caused by Micrococcus zymogenes (nov. spec.) with a description of the microorganism. J. exp. Med. 4, 521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mallmann, W. L. & Seligmann, E. B. (1950). A comparative study of media for the detection of streptococci in water and sewage. Amer. J. publ. Hlth, 40, 286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ORLA-Jensen, S. (1919). The Lactic Acid Bacteria, Copenhagen: Andr., Fred Høst and Son.Google Scholar
Ostrolenk, M., Kramer, N. & Cleverdon, R. C. (1947). Comparative studies of enterococci and Escherichia coli as indices of pollution. J. Bact. 53, 197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritter, C. & Treece, E. L. (1948). Sanitary significance of cocci in swimming pools. Amer. J. publ. Hlth, 38, 1532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savage, W. G. & Read, W. J. (1916). The significance of streptococci in water supplies. J. Hyg., Camb., 15, 334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shattock, P. M. F. & Hirsch, A. (1947). A liquid medium buffered at pH 9.6 for the differentiation of Streptococcus faecalis from Streptococcus lactis. J. Path. Bact. 59, 1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shattock, P. M. F. & Mattick, A. T. R. (1943). The serological grouping of Streptococcus lactis (Group N) and its relationship to Streptococcus faecalis. J. Hyg., Camb., 43, 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, J. M. & Wing, H. V. (1937). Streptococcus durans, n.sp. J. Dairy Sci. 20, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, M. L. & Lichstein, H. C. (1940). Sodium azide as an inhibiting substance for Gram-negative bacteria. J. infect. Dis. 67, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar