Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T17:32:50.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Elevated temperature technique for the isolation of salmonellas from sewage and human faeces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Nassim H. Nabbut
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology and Virology, School of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Modified Moore's swabs, placed in sewers for 5 days, were used to concentrate salmonellas from sewage. Duplicate cultures of swab strips in selenite broth were incubated at 41 and 37°C. respectively. Salmonella organisms were recovered consistently from the swabs when the enrichment broths were incubated at 41°C., However, when equal portions of the same swabs were incubated at 37°C., only 22% of them yielded Salmonella organisms. These results indicate an advantage in incubating the selenite broths at 41°C. rather than 37°C. in attempting to isolate salmonellas from sewage.

One hundred and fifty faecal samples were examined for salmonellas by culture in selenite broths incubated at 41 and 37°C. Twelve (8%) samples were positive at 41°C. compared to only 10 (6·7%) positive samples at 37°C. This difference is not statistically significant to indicate an advantage of the elevated-temperature of incubation over the conventional temperature in attempting to isolate salmonellas from human faeces. Moreover, results of the recovery rates of S. paratyphi B, S. typhi, and S. typhimurium indicate that an incubation temperature of 37°C. is more appropriate for recovering salmonellas from artificially infected faecal samples than an incubation temperature of 41°C. This stresses the inability of laboratory studies to mimic conditions in nature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

References

REFERENCES

Edwards, P. R. & Ewing, W. H. (1962). Identification of Enterobacteriaceae, p. 92. Minnesota: Burgess Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. & Thomson, S. (1953). Optimum temperature of incubation for isolation of salmonellae. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 12, 149–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1968). Elevated temperature of enrichment media for the isolation of salmonellas from heavily contaminated materials. Journal of Hygiene 66, 377–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, B. (1948). The detection of paratyphoid carriers in towns by means of sewage examination. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 7, 241–8.Google Scholar
Morahan, R. J. & Hawksworth, D. N. (1969). Isolation of salmonellae from New Guinea streams and waterholes using an elevated temperature technique. Medical Journal of Australia ii, 20–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, G. K. & Dunn, C. G. (1970). Influence of incubation temperature and sodium heptadecyl sulphate (Tergitol no. 7) on the isolation of salmonellae from pork sausage. Applied Microbiology 20, 192–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nabbut, N. H. & Jamal, H. H. (1970). Distribution and epidemiological significance of Salmonella serotypes of domestic animals in Lebanon. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 42, 171–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Spino, D. F. (1966). Elevated-temperature technique for isolation of Salmonella from streams. Applied Microbiology 14, 591–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, G. S. & Miles, A. A. (1964). Topley and Wilson's Principles of Bacteriology and Immunity, 5th ed., p. 473, London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. J. (1938). Isolation of Bact. typhosum by means of bismuth sulphite medium in water and milk-borne epidemics. Journal of Hygiene 38, 507–19.Google ScholarPubMed