Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:59:02.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrophoretic typing of Enterobacter cloacae with a limited set of enzyme stains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. A. Gaston  and
M. Warner
M. A. Gaston
Affiliation:
Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
M. Warner
Affiliation:
Central Public Health Laboratory, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hospital isolates of Enterobacter cloacae were analysed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for enzyme polymorphism and the results were compared with established serotyping, phage typing and biotyping techniques. Initially, the diversity of electromorphs of 13 enzymes was determined on a representative set of 62 distinct strains. Two broad clusters of strains were found in the species, and analysis by serotype suggested a limited diversity within the most frequent o serotvpes. A subset of three enzymes, lactate dehydrogenase, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, glutamate dehydrogenase and an unidentified marker, were selected and used to type groups of hospital isolates. There was good general agreement between the two systems, although the enzyme method failed to distinguish between some strains with the same serotype. This method provided useful epidemiological information and, in the absence of established typing systems, it is a practical approach to subdividing the species.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 103 , Issue 2 , October 1989 , pp. 255 - 264
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

REFERENCES

1.John, JF, Sharbaugh, RJ, Bannister, ER.Enterobacter cloacae: bacteremia, epidemiology, and antibiotic resistance. Rev Infect Dis 1982; 4: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Bauernfeind, A, Petermuller, C.Typing of Enterobacter spp. by bacteriocin susceptibility and its use in epidemiological analysis. J Clin Microbiol 1984; 20: 70–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Gaston, MA.Enterobacter, an emerging nosocomial pathogen. J Hosp Infect 1988; 11 197–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Selander, RK, McKinney, RM, Whittam, TS, et al. Genetic structure of populations of Legionella pneumophilia. J Bacteriol 1985; 163: 1021–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Selander, RK, Caugant, DA, Ochman, H, Musser, JM, Gilmour, MN, Whittam, TS.Methods of multilocus enzyme electrophoresis for bacteria population genetics and systematics. Appl Environ Microbiol 1986; 51: 873–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Olyhoek, T, Crowe, BA. Achtman, M.Clonal population structure of Neisseria meningiditis serogroup A isolated from epidemics and pandemics between 1915 and 1983. Rev Infect Dis 1987; 9: 665–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Goullet, P.Picard, B.Characterization of Enterobacter cloacae and E. Sakazakii by electrophoretic polymorphism of acid phosphatase, esterases, and glutamate, lactate and malate dehydrogenases. J Gen Microbiol 1986; 132: 3105–12.Google Scholar
8.Gaston, MA, Bucher, C, Pitt, TL.O serotyping scheme for Enterobacter cloacae. J Clin Microbiol 1983; 18: 1079–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Gaston, MA.Evaluation of a bacteriophage-typing scheme for Enterobacter cloacae. J Med Microbiol 1987; 24: 291–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Old, DC.Biotyping of Enterobacter cloacae. J Clin Pathol 1982; 35: 875–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Laemmli, UK.Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227: 680–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Goullet, P, Picard, B.Differentiation of Shigella by esterase electrophoretic polymorphism. J Gen Microbiol 1987; 133: 1005–17.Google ScholarPubMed
13.Owen, RJ, Jackman, PJH.The similarities between Pseudomonas paucimobilis and allied bacteria derived from analysis of deoxyribonucleic acids and electrophoretic protein patterns. J Gen Microbiol 1982; 128: 2945–54.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Goullet, P, Picard, B.Characterization of Yersinia enterocolitica, Y. intermedia, Y. aldovae, Y. frederiksenii, Y. kristensenii and Y. pseudotuberculosis by electrophoretic polymorphism of acid phosphatase, esterases, and glutamate and malate dehydrogenases. J Gen Microbiol 1988; 134: 317–25.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Picard, B, Goullet, P.Epidemiological complexity of hospital aeromonas infections revealed by electrophoretic typing of esterases. Epidemiol Infect 1987; 98: 5–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed