Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:43:55.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of humoral, cellular and non-specific immunity on intracerebral Bordetella pertussis infections in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Jean M. Dolby
Affiliation:
The Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine, Elstree Hertfordshire
D. E. Dolby
Affiliation:
The Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine, Elstree Hertfordshire
Caroline J. Bronne-Shanbury
Affiliation:
The Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine, Elstree Hertfordshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

When mice were injected intracerebrally with doses of Bordetella pertussis vaccine greater than 5 ImD50 and challenged intracerebrally 14 days later with virulent B. pertussis there was an immediate reduction in the numbers of organisms. An analysis of this in vivo bactericidal effect has shown that large doses of an unrelated vaccine, Salmonella typhosa, equivalent in cell mass to about 50 ImD 50 of B. pertussis vaccine can achieve this effect, so for such doses the effect must be partly non-specific. This action is not maintained and so is not ultimately protective. Local immunoglobulin was also demonstrable 14 days after 300 ImD 50 of B. pertussis vaccine but following smaller doses of 10–20 ImD 50 it could not be found until after the mice had been infected and the blood–brain barrier impaired.

A similar immediate reduction in the numbers of infecting organisms inoculated 1 day after vaccination has been shown to follow very small, non-protective doses of vaccines unrelated to B. pertussis and to be achieved with lipopolysaccharide and endotoxin isolated from B. pertussis. Brains were not sterilized and only in mice receiving protective B. pertussis vaccine was the lowering of infection maintained beyond 2 days and the brains eventually sterilized.

The antibody passively protecting mice against intracerebral infection was found in the 19 S and 11 S globulin fractions of the serum of once-vaccinated mice and in the 11 S and 7 S fractions of the serum of rabbits and ascitic fluid of mice receiving repeated doses of vaccine. The IgM probably eliminated infections by immediate sterilization but had to be present locally to do so since it was unable to pass from the circulation into the brain, and was therefore inactive when injected intraperitoneally. The IgA and IgG were not so restricted and both the 11 S and 7 S globulins were capable of exerting an immediate suppressive effect on infecting organisms. The 7 S globulin was also capable of a maintained or delayed suppressive effect.

Lymphocytes from fully protected once-vaccinated mice, transferred 2–3 weeks after intraperitoneal vaccination, were able to confer some protection when injected intraperitoneally or intracerebrally into recipient mice infected 2 weeks after transfer. Homologous, non-concentrated antiserum from once-vaccinated mice, injected intraperitoneally 1 hr. before infection sometimes augmented the transferred immunity, whereas alone it was inactive.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Ackers, J. P. & Dolby, J. M. (1972). The antigen of Bordetella pertussis that induces bactericidal antibody and its relationship to protection of mice. Journal of General Microbiology 70, 371–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Actor, P. & Pitkin, D. (1973). Immunity to Vibrio cholerae in the mouse. II. The effect of a cell-adherent immune factor. Infection and Immunity 7, 35–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, G. J. (1968). Experimental infection with Bordetella pertussis in the mouse brain. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Adams, G. J. & Hopewell, J. W. (1970). Enhancement of intracerebral infection of mice with Bordetella pertussis. Journal of Medical Microbiology 3, 1527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anacker, R. L. & Munoz, J. (1961). Characterisation and properties of antibody in mouse peritoneal fluid. Journal of Immunology 87, 426–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, E. K. (1957). Demonstration of promunity in the early immunity of pertussis vaccinated mice. Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica 40, 227–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berenbaum, M. C., Ungar, J. & Stevens, W. K. (1960). Intracranial infection of mice with Bordetella pertussis. Journal of General Microbiology 22, 313–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celada, F. (1966). Quantitative studies of the adoptive immunological memory in mice. I. An age-dependent barrier to syngeneic transplantation. Journal of Experimental Medicine 124, 114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, M. W. (1967). Production of antiserum. Immunisation of mammals other than man. Methods in Immunology and Immunochemistry, (ed. Williams, C. A. and Chase, M. W.), pp. 222–3. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. M. (1953). Effect of viruses on pertussis infection in mice. Atti del VI Congresso internazionale di Microbiologicae 3, 1418.Google Scholar
Dolby, J. M. (1965). The antibacterial effect of Bordetella pertussis antisera. Immunology 8, 484–98.Google ScholarPubMed
Dolby, J. M. (1972). Passive protection of mice against intracerebral infections with Bordetella pertussis. Journal of Hygiene 70, 707–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Dolby, J. M., Ackers, J. P. & Dolby, D. E. (1975). The effect of mouse-protective antigen and the antigen which elicits bactericidal antibody on the growth of Bordetella pertussis in mouse brains. Journal of Hygiene 74, 7183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolby, J. M. & Dolby, D. E. (1969). The antibody activities of 19 S and 7 S fractions from rabbit antisera to Bordetella pertussis. Immunology 16, 737–47.Google Scholar
Dolby, J. M. & Standfast, A. F. B. (1961). The intracerebral infection of mice with Bordetella pertussis. Journal of Hygiene 59, 205–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, D. G. & Perkins, F. T. (1954). Interference immunity produced by pertussis vaccine to pertussis infection in mice. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 35, 603–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Hirschfeld, J. (1959). Individual precipitation patterns of normal rabbit sera. Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica 46, 229–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Holt, L. B. (1972). The pathology and immunology of Bordetella pertussis infection. Journal of Medical Microbiology 5, 407–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holt, L. B., Spasojevic, V., Dolby, J. M. & Standfast, A. F. B. (1961). Immunity in mice to an intracerebral challenge of Bordetella pertussis. Journal of Hygiene 59, 373–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iida, T. & Tajima, M. (1971). Stimulation of non-specific resistance by heterologous endotoxins and experimental immunity to Bordetella pertussis in mice. Immunology 21, 313–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Mäkelä, O. & Mitchison, N. A. (1965). The role of cell number and source in adoptive immunity. Immunology 8, 539–48.Google ScholarPubMed
Medical Research Council (1956). Vaccination against whooping-cough. Relation between protection in children and results of laboratory tests. British Medical Journal II, 454–62.Google Scholar
Medical Research Council (1959). Vaccination against whooping-cough. Final report. British Medical Journal I, 9941000.Google Scholar
Nagano, Y. & Maehara, M. (1972). Enhancement of endotoxin-induced virus-inhibiting factor or interferon production by pretreatment of the rabbit with Newcastle disease virus. Japanese Journal of Microbiology xv, 397402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, B. S. & Rose, N. R. (1970). Antibody formation by adoptively transferred mouse peripheral blood leucocytes. Immunology 18, 259–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Salvin, S. B., Younger, J. S. & Chederer, W. H. (1973). Migration inhibiting factor and interferon in the circulation of mice with delayed hypersensitivity. Infection and Immunity 7, 6875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spasojevic, V. & Holt, L. B. (1962). The mechanism of immunity towards B. pertussis in the mouse brain. Round Table Conference on pertussis immunisation. Proceedings of the International Association of Biological Standardisation 2, 288–94.Google Scholar
Standfast, A. F. B. (1958). The comparison between field trials and mouse protection tests against intransal and intracerebral challenges with Bordetella pertussis. Immunology 1, 135–43.Google Scholar
Standfast, A. F. B. (1960). A report on the laboratory assays carried out at the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine on the typhoid vaccines used in the field study in Yugoslavia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 23, 3745.Google ScholarPubMed
Standfast, A. F. B. & Dolby, J. M. (1972). The influence of the route of immunization on the protection of mice infected intracerebrally with Bordetella pertussis. Journal of Hygiene 70, 487501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wardlaw, A. C. & Jakus, C. M. (1968). Intracerebral mouse protection test for pertussis vaccine. I. Apparent absence of humoral protective antibody under the usual test conditions. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 14, 989–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zatz, M. M., Gingrich, R. & Lance, E. M. (1972). The effect of histocompatibility antigens on lymphocyte migration in the mouse. Immunology 23, 665–75.Google ScholarPubMed