Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:59:46.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of storage in slurry on the virulence of Salmonella dublin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

P. W. Jones
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council, Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The mouse was used as a model to determine whether storage of Salmonella dublin in slurry and in broth reduces the virulence of the organism. No reduction in virulence of S. dublin stored in slurry for 36 days or in maintenance broth for 70 days was observed. The disease hazard involved in pasture-spreading of slurry contaminated with salmonellas is related to factors other than virulence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Cruickshank, R. (1968). Medical Microbiology, 11th ed., p. 872. Edinburgh and London, E. & S. Livingstone.Google Scholar
Findlay, C. R. (1971). The survival of Salmonella dublin in cattle slurry. Veterinary Record 89, 224–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, P. W. & Matthews, P. R. J. (1975). Examination of slurry from cattle for pathogenic bacteria. Journal of Hygiene 74, 5764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rankin, J. D. & Taylor, R. J. (1969). A study of some disease hazards which could be associated with the system of applying cattle slurry to pasture. Veterinary Record 85, 578–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rappaport, F., Konfortt, N. & Navon, Betty (1956). A new enrichment medium for certain salmonellae. Journal of Clinical Pathology 9, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R. J. (1973). A further assessment of the potential hazard for calves allowed to graze pasture contaminated with S. dublin in slurry. British Veterinary Journal 129, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar