Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:33:13.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of a changed environment on bacterial colonization rates in an established burns centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

P. J. Wormald
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Odstock Hospital, Salisbury, Wilts
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In an established burns centre which moved from an old building to new purpose-designed premises, colonization rates of patients' burns with Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other Gram-negative bacilli were not reduced. Colonization rates with Streptococcus pyogenes increased but the increase was mainly due to multiple importations in the new premises of a strain of higher communicability than any seen in the old.

In the first 32 months in the new environment 10 patients were found colonized with pseudomonas on admission and 20 became colonized in the unit. A much higher proportion of patients with burns of more than 30% body surface became colonized than of patients with less. About one-third of the above 20 patients became colonized with strains already isolated from another patient; all but one of them had small area burns. Cross-infection was not observed from numerous heavily colonized patients with high percentage burns. This paradox is discussed in detail. Basin outflows in the new premises became colonized with P. aeruginosa of two serotypes not found on patients in this unit.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

References

REFERENCES

Ayliffe, G. A. J., Collins, B. J., Lowbury, E. J. L., Babb, J. R. & Lilly, H. A. (1967). Ward floors and other surfaces as reservoirs of hospital infection. Journal of Hygiene 65, 515.Google ScholarPubMed
Barclay, T. L. & Dexter, F. (1968). Infection and cross-infection in a new burns centre. British Journal of Surgery 55, 197.Google Scholar
Govan, J. R. W. & Gillies, R. R. (1969). Progress in pyocine typing. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2, 17.Google Scholar
Habs, I. (1957). Untersuchungen über die O-Antigene von Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Zeitschrift für Hygiene und Infektionskrankheiten 144, 218.Google Scholar
Jellard, C. H. & Churcher, G. M. (1967). An outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (pyocyanea) infection in a Premature Baby Unit, with observations on the intestinal carriage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the newborn. Journal of Hygiene 65, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Fox, J. (1954). The epidemiology of infection with Pseudomonas pyocyanea in a Burns Unit. Journal of Hygiene 52, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Thom, B. T., Lilly, H. A., Babb, J. R. & Whittal, K. (1970). Sources of infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with tracheostomy. Journal of Medical Microbiology 3, 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohn, J. (1966). In Research on Burns, Ed. Wallace, A. B. and Wilkinson, A. W., p. 486. Edinburgh and London.Google Scholar
Sachs, A. & Watson, J. (1969). Four years experience at a specialized burns centre. Lancet i, 718.Google Scholar
Shooter, R. A., Walker, K. A., Williams, V. R., Horgan, G. M., Parker, M. T., Ashe-Shov, E. H. & Bullimore, J. F. (1966). Faecal carriage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospital patients. Lancet ii, 1331.Google Scholar
Ten, Cate L. (1965). A note on a simple and rapid method of bacteriological sampling by means of agar sausages. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 28, 221.Google Scholar
Williams, R. E. O. (1958). Laboratory diagnosis of streptococcal infections. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 19, 153.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. E. O., Blowers, B., Garrod, L. P. & Shooter, R. A. (1966). Hospital Infection, 2nd Ed., 97. London: Lloyd–Luke.Google Scholar
Williams, R. E. O. & Maxted, W. R. (1953). The type classification of Streptococcus pyogenes. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Microbiology 1, 46.Google Scholar