Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:04:51.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The ecology of Microsporum canis Bodin in New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Mary J. Marples
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, University of Otago, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The clinical findings and environmental factors of 138 families infected with Microsporum canis are recorded.

2. Of the 171 children suffering from tinea capitis, 25% had lesions which remained localized, 51% had local spread of infection and 24% had a generalized spread, involving most of the scalp.

3. The clinical pattern of the infection was not associated with the sex or age of the child, nor with the source of infection.

4. In 30.5% of the families there was a definite cat source of infection, in 3.6% a definite dog source and in 13.9% a definite human source. A further 20.3% had a probable animal source, and 7.9% a probable human source, while in 23.9% no obvious source of infection could be found.

5. The social status of 95 families was investigated. In 4.2% the breadwinner was a farmer, in 12.6% he belonged to the professional and managerial group, in 60% he was a skilled labourer and in 22.1% an unskilled labourer. The houses of 75 families were visited. House conditions were classed as good in 58%, fair in 33% and poor in 9%. It is suggested that ringworm due to M. canis in New Zealand is not associated with poverty or poor conditions and no stigma should be attached to the development of an infection.

6. Evidence for the following types of transmission of infection was obtained: cat to child; dog to child; child to child; child to adult; cat to cat; child to cat; dog to cat; cat to dog.

7. The findings of the investigation are discussed. It is suggested that human infections with M. canis are part of a complicated network resulting from the commensal relationship of the cat to man. Better care of cats so that kittens are not allowed to stray would assist in the control of human infections.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

References

REFERENCES

Carlier, , Gwendoline, I. M. (1954). J. Hyg., Camb., 52, 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Touche, C. J. (1952 a). Vet. Rec. 64, 398.Google Scholar
La Touche, C. J. (1952 b). Brit. med. J. 2, 1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Touche, C. J. (1955 a). Vet. Rec. 67, 578.Google Scholar
La Touche, C. J. (1955 b). Vet. Rec. 67, 666.Google Scholar
Marples, M. J. (1951). N.Z. med. J. 50, 460.Google Scholar
Schwartz, L., Peck, S. M., Botvinick, I., Liebowitz, A. L. & Frasier, Elizabeth (1946). J. Amer. med. Ass. 132, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, B. A. (1953). Brit. med. J. 1, 536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jacqueline (1950). Brit. J. Derm. Syph. 62, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar