Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:22:07.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The duration of immunity in cattle following inoculation of rinderpest cell culture vaccine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

W. Plowright
Affiliation:
A.F.R.C. Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire, RG16 ONN, U.K.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The duration of immunity following a single administration of rinderpest cell culture vaccine, of 90 or more monolayer passages, was studied in E. African zebu (Boran) and grade (cross-bred European) cattle. All animals were kept for periods of 6–11 years in rinderpest-free environments; groups of them (in all 23 Borans and 10 grades) were then challenged by parenteral or intranasal inoculation of virulent virus or by contact exposure to reacting cattle. Nasal excretion of virus was studied daily over the 10-to 14-day period following challenge, and simultaneous attempts were made to detect viraemia. The neutralizing antibody response was followed at 6-month intervals over the whole post-vaccination period and then daily for 10 days and at longer intervals to 3 weeks after challenge.

All 33 animals which were exposed by various routes failed to react clinically and a rinderpest viraemia was never detected. No transmission of virus from the vaccinates to susceptible in-contact controls occurred within 14 or more days, from the 20 animals which could be so tested. Clearcut serological responses to challenge were seen in six cattle (four Borans and two grades) which were challenged after 7 years or more; these reactions were all delayed to the 9th or 10th days, i.e. they were not typically ‘anamnestic’.

These results are discussed in relation to mass vaccination campaigns for the control of rinderpest and from the comparative viewpoint of measles vaccination in man.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

Anderson, J., Rowe, L. W., Taylor, W. P. & Crowther, J. R. (1982). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies to rinderpest virus in experimentally infected cattle. Research in Veterinary Science 32, 242247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appel, M. J. G. & Gillespie, J. H. (1972). Canine distemper virus. Virology Monographs 11, 196.Google Scholar
Anon (1971). Vaccination against measles. Third Report to the Medical Research Council by the Measles Vaccines Committee. The Practitioner 206, 458466.Google Scholar
Brown, P., Gajdusek, D. C. & Tsai, T. (1969). Persistence of measles antibody in the absence of circulating natural virus five years after immunisation of an isolated virgin population with Edmonston B vaccine. American Journal of Epidemiology 90, 514518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Boer, C. J. & Barber, T. L. (1964). Segregation of an avirulent variant of rinderpest virus by the terminal dilution technique in tissue culture. Journal of Immunology 92, 902907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, R. M. (1964). In Techniques in Experimental Virology (ed. Harris, R. J. C.), pp. 169223. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Iyigören, B., Ünlü, M. & Yonguc, A. D. (1976). Studies on pre- and post-natal serum antibody in cows vaccinated against rinderpest. Etlik Veteriner Bakteriyoloji Enstitusu 4, 510.Google Scholar
Kalis, J. M., Quie, P. G. & Balfour, H. H. (1975), Measles (rubella) susceptibility among elementary schoolchildren American Journal of Epidemiology 101, 527531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, S. (1971). Present status of measles and rubella immunisation in the United States: a medical progress report. Journal of Pediatrics 78, 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krugman, S. (1977). Present status of measles and rubella immunisation in the United States: a medical progress report. Journal of Pediatrics 90, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lepissier, H. & Macfarlane, I. (1967). Techniques de vaccinations massives en vue de contrôler l'éxpansion de la peste bovine (Campagne jointe contre la peste bovine). Bulletin de l'Office International des Epizooties 68, 665689.Google Scholar
Liess, B. & Plowright, W. (1964). Studies on the pathogenesis of rinderpest in experimental cattle. I. Correlation of clinical signs, viraemia and virus excretion by various routes. Journal of Hygiene 62, 81100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linneman, C. C., Rotte, T. C., Schiff, G. M. & Youtsey, J. L. (1972). A seroepidemiologicstudy of a measles epidemic in a highly immunised population. American Journal of Epidemiology 95, 238246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawathe, D. R. & Lamoude, A. G. (1982). Recurrence of rinderpest in Nigeria. Veterinary Record 111, 203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nawathe, D. R., Lamorde, A. G. & Kumar, S. (1983). Recrudescence of rinderpest in Nigeria. Veterinary Record 113, 156157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plowright, W. (1962 a). The application of monolayer tissue culture techniques in rinderpest research. Introduction. Use in serological investigations and diagnosis. Bulletin de l'Office International des Épizooties 57, 123.Google Scholar
Plowright, W. (1962 b). The application of monolayer tissue culture techniques in rinderpest research. II. The use of attenuated culture virus as a vaccine for cattle. Bulletin de l'Office International des Épizooties 57, 253257.Google Scholar
Plowright, W. (1964). Studies on the pathogenesis of rinderpest in experimental cattle. II. Proliferation of the virus in different tissues following intranasal infection. Journal of Hygiene 62, 257281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plowright, W. (1968). Rinderpest virus. Virology Monographs 3, 25110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowright, W. (1972 a). The production and use of rinderpest cell culture vaccine in developing countries. World Animal Review 1, 1418.Google Scholar
Plowright, W. (1972 b). The standardisation of procedures for the production of rinderpest vaccines and for the laboratory confirmation of rinderpest diagnosis. In CENTO Seminar on the Control and Eradication of Viral Disease in the CENTO region. Central Treaty Organisiation.Google Scholar
Plowright, W. & Ferris, R. D. (1961). Studies with rinderpest virus in tissue culture. III. The stability of cultured virus and its use in virus neutralisation tests. Archiv für die gesamte Virusforschung 11, 516533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowright, W. & Ferris, R. D. (1962 a). Studies with rinderpest virus in tissue culture. A technique for the detection and titration of virulent virus in cattle tissues. Research in Veterinary Science 3, 94103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowright, W. & Ferris, R. D. (1962 b). Studies with rinderpest virus in tissue culture. The use of attenuated culture virus as a vaccine for cattle. Research in Veterinary Science 3, 172182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plowright, W. & Taylor, W. P. (1967). Long-term studies of the immunity in East African cattle following inoculation with rinderpest culture vaccine. Research in Veterinary Science 8, 118128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plowright, W., Hehniman, K. A. J. & Rampton, C. S. (1969). Studies on rinderpest culture vaccine. I. Some factors affecting virus production. Research in Veterinary Science 10, 373381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Provost, A. (1970). Observations sur les muco-anticorps nasaux des bovins. Revue d'Élevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux 23, 283293.Google Scholar
Provost, A., Maurice, Y. & Borredon, C. (1969). Comportement clinique et immunologique, lors de contamination bovipestique, de bovins vaccinés depuis plusiers années contre la peste bovine avec des vaccins de culture cellulaires. Revue d'Élevage et de Médecine Vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux 22, 453464.Google Scholar
Rossiter, P. B., Jessett, D. M., Wafula, J. S., Karstad, L., Chema, S., Taylor, W. P., Nyange, J. C., Mumbala, M. & Scott, G. R. (1983). Re-emergence of rinderpest as a threat in East Africa since 1979. Veterinary Record 113, 459461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rweyemamu, M. M., Reid, H. W. & Okuna, N. (1974). Observations on the behaviour of rinderpest virus in immune animals challenged intranasally. Bulletin of Epizootic Diseases in Africa 22, 19.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. P. & Plowright, W. (1965). Studies on the pathogenesis of rinderpest in experimental cattle. III. Proliferation of an attenuated strain in various tissues following subcutaneous inoculation. Journal of Hygiene 63, 263275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, R. E., Buynak, E. B., McLean, A. A., Roehm, R. R. & Hilleman, M. R. (1980). Persistence of antibody in human subjects for 7–10 years following administration of combined live attenuated measles, mumps and rubella virus vaccines. Proceedings of the Society of Experimental Biology, New York 165, 260263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (1970). Requirements for Rinderpest Cell Culture Vaccine (Live) and Rinderpest Vaccine (Live). Technical Report Series, 1970, No. 444. Twenty-second report of the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardisation. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar