Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T20:34:21.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diphtheria amongst the Bantu

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. F. Murray
Affiliation:
South African Institute for Medical Research, Johannesburg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A total of 499 rural and 437 urban Bantu school children were examined for their diphtheria carrier rate and Schick immunity.

2. Clinical diphtheria amongst the rural and urban Bantu was also investigated.

3. The virulent C. diphtheriae carrier rate was found to be 3·2% in the rural children and 1·8% in the urban with virulent/avirulent ratios of 1: 1·1 and 1: 2·5 respectively.

4. The Schick-positive rate in children aged 6–17 years was found to be 8·0% in rural children and 13·7 % in urban.

5. Clinical diphtheria was rarely encountered under rural conditions, but was more common in urban natives.

6. The case mortality rate in eighty-nine clinical cases was 14·4%.

7. 53% of the clinical cases occurred in the 0-5 years age group.

8. 89% of the strains recovered belonged to the mitis type. No intermediate strains were encountered.

9. The reason for the infrequency of clinical diphtheria amongst the Bantu is discussed and various theories are reviewed.

10. It is concluded that the infrequency of clinical diphtheria is partly due to the environment, but that there is also a racial factor. It is suggested that the racial factor lies in an ability to produce antitoxin quickly. There is not sufficient evidence in this investigation to show whether the racial factor is genetic, but in view of Turbott's work amongst the Maoris it is suggested that the racial factor in immunity to diphtheria may be genetic amongst the Bantu also.

I have pleasure in acknowledging the continued interest of Dr E. H. Cluver, Director, and Dr G. Buchanan, Deputy-Director, of the South African Institute for Medical Research in the progress of this work. I also wish to acknowledge gratefully the help given me by Dr Prestwick, Dr Miller and Dr Xuma at Alexandra Township. I am indebted to the Administration, and in particular to Dr J. W. Stirling, Principal Medical Officer of Bechuanaland Protectorate Government, for permission to carry out the investigation at Kanye. To Dr Marcus of the Seventh Day Adventist Mission, Kanye, I am deeply indebted for help and hospitality, and to Chief Bathoën who assisted me in making contact with the requisite number of school children at Kanye. My thanks are also due to the Mother Superior and Sisters of the Holy Cross Mission, Alexandra Township, and the many Bantu school teachers who gave me access to the children in their charge. Mr Barnes (S.A.I.M.R.) very kindly carried out the statistical tests of Tables 1 and 2. The travelling expenses involved in this work were defrayed by a grant from the National Research Board.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1943

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. S., Happold, F. C., McLeod, J. W. & Thomson, J. G. (1931). On the existence of two forms of diphtheria bacillus—B. diphtheriae gravis and B. diphtheriae mitis—and a new medium for their differentiation and for the bacteriological diagnosis of diphtheria. J. Path. Bact. 34, 667–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basutoland. Ann. Med. Sanit. Rep. 1935-1939.Google Scholar
Bechuanaland Protectorate. Ann. Med. Sanit. Rep. 1935-1938.Google Scholar
Black, J. B. (1934). A comparative study of susceptibility to diphtheria in the white and negro races. Amer. J. Hyg. 19, 734–48.Google Scholar
Borra, E. (1939). Contributo allo studio dell' infezione difterica in Etiopia. Rass. sanit. A.O.I. Addis Ababa, 1, 4953.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, G. C., van den Branden, F. & Geens, J. (1939). Le problème de la diphtérie au Congo Belge. Arch. méd. Soc. Hyg. 2, 355–82.Google Scholar
Cauchi, J. & Smith, E. C. (1934). An analysis of 1758 Schick tests in Nigerian natives. Lancet, 2, 1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, K. E., Happold, F. C., McLeod, J. W. & Woodcock, H. E. de C. (1936). Review of the observations which have accumulated with regard to the significance of diphtheria types in the last four years (1931-1935). Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 29, 1029–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doull, J. A. (1930). Factors influencing selective distribution in diphtheria. J. Prev. Med., Baltimore, 4, 371404.Google Scholar
Doull, J. A. & Fales, W. T. (1923). Carriers of diphtheria bacilli among the school population of Baltimore. Amer. J. Hyg. 3, 604–39.Google Scholar
Dudley, S. F. (1929). Critical review. Schick's test and its application. Quart. J. Med. 22, 321–79.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. (1929). Schick testing and preventive inoculation in Capetown. Ann. Rep. Med. Officer Hlth, Cape Town, p. 39.Google Scholar
Elmes, G. T. (1941). The isolation of virulent strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae in Nigeria. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasit. 35, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerson, N. (1941). An investigation of the diphtheria bacillary carrier rate in natives. S. Afr. J. Med. Sci. 6, 51–2.Google Scholar
Ferguson, D. L. (1932). The urbanization of the Bantu. S. Afr. Med. J. 6, 802–6.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. (1932). Untersuchungen zur Frage der Diphtherie-Immunität der schwarzen Rasse. Z. ImmunForsch. 74, 244–8.Google Scholar
Fletcher, W. (1927). Notes on diphtheria in the Federated Malay States. Bull. Inst. Med. Res. F.M.S. no. 2.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. G. (1932). Diphtheria Past and Present. Its Aetiology, Distribution, Transmission and Prevention, pp. 386, 394 and 421. London: John Bale, Sons and Danielsson, Ltd.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. T., MacNabb, A. L. & Roy, I. S. (1937). The intracutaneous virulence test for Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Univ. Toronto Stud. Connaught Lab. 9, no. 10.Google Scholar
Frobisher, M. (1940). Strains of C. diphtheriae in various parts of the United States. Amer. J. Publ. Hlth Suppl. 30, 2835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, W. H. (1928). Infection, immunity and disease in the epidemiology of diphtheria. J. Prev. Med., Baltimore, 2, 325–43.Google Scholar
Fulton, F., Moore, B., Taylor, J., Wells, A. Q. & Wilson, G. S. (1942). Immunization against diphtheria with alum-precipitated toxoid. Brit. Med. J. 1, 315–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, D. G. (1940). Schick tests and carrier surveys in white school children, Alabama, 1937–1938. Amer. J. Publ. Hlth Suppl. 30, 25–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, L. & Navarro, R. (1923). Diphtheria carriers and their significance in the Philippines. Philipp. J. Sci. 22, 559–66.Google Scholar
Gomez, L., Navarro, R. & Kapauan, A. M. (1922). The Schick reaction in Filipinos. Philipp. J. Sci. 20, 323–7.Google Scholar
Grasset, E., Perret-Gentil, A., Friedman, J. & Gross, I. (1933). Studies on the nature of antidiphtheritic immunity among South African Bantu by means of the Schick test and antitoxin titrations. S. Afr. Med. J. 7, 779–85.Google Scholar
Gregory, T. S. (1937). Some observations on the types of Corynebacterium diphtheriae found in Victoria, Australia. J. Path. Bact. 45, 333–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, W. (1940). A Schick test and diphtheria carrier survey of white school children in Virginia. Amer. J. Publ. Hlth Suppl. 30, 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinbecker, P. & Irvine-Jones, E. I. M. (1928). Susceptibility of Eskimos to the common cold and a study of their natural immunity to diphtheria, scarlet fever and bacterial filtrates. J. Immunol. 15, 395406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, T. S. (1929). Diphtheria. Ann. Rep. Med. Officer Hlth, Cape Town, p. 36.Google Scholar
Higgins, T. S. (1930). The control of diphtheria. J. Med. Ass. S. Afr. 4, 479–86.Google Scholar
Kleine, F. K. (1940). Diphtherie bei Eingeborenen in Afrika. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 66, 1366–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleine, F. K. & Kroó, H. (1930). Antitoxine im Blut von Eingeborenen in Ostafrika. Dtsch. med. Wschr. 56, 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancet (1931). Racial herd-immunity of the Maori. Lancet, 2, 970–1.Google Scholar
Medical Journal of Australia (1929). Immunity to diphtheria in Maoris. Med. J. Aust. 1, 157–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, J. F. (1942). Diphtheria on the Witwatersrand. A bacteriological, clinical and epidemiological survey. S. Afr. Med. J. 16, 247–50.Google Scholar
Nélis, P., van den Branden, F. & Bourguignon, G. C. (1936). A propos d'un cas de diphtérie mortel. Ann. Soc. belge Méd. trop. 16, 507–12.Google Scholar
Ramon, G. & Nélis, P. (1934a). Sur la présence de l'antitoxine diphtérique d'origine naturelle chez les indigènes de l'Afrique occidentale. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 116, 1248–50.Google Scholar
Ramon, G. & Nélis, P. (1934b). L'immunité antidiphtérique chez les noirs du Congo Belge. Ann. Soc. belge Méd. trop. 14, 457–67.Google Scholar
Saleun, G. & Palinacci, A. (1938). La réaction de Schick en Afrique Equatoriale Française. Bull. Soc. Path. Exot. 31, 897900.Google Scholar
Sutherland, P. L. & Iredale, J. L. G. (1937). Clauberg's tellurite indicator medium in routine diagnosis of C. diphtheriae. J. Path. Bact. 45, 325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swaziland. Ann. Med. Sanit. Rep. 1935-1938.Google Scholar
Vardon, A. C. (1923). Diphtheria bacillus carriers in a mixed Indian population. Indian J. Med. Res. 11, 611–20.Google Scholar
Wells, J. R. (1933). The origin of immunity to diphtheria in central and polar Eskimos. Amer. J. Hyg. 18, 629–55.Google Scholar
Zinnemann, K. & Zinnemann, I. (1939). Incidence and significance of the types of diphtheria bacilli in the Ukraine. J. Path. Bact. 48, 155–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar