Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:20:05.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differentiation of strains of Helicobacter pylori by numerical analysis of 1-D SDS-PAGE protein patterns: Evidence for post-treatment recrudescence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. Costas ,
D. D. Morgan ,
R. J. Owen  and
D. R. Morgan
M. Costas
Affiliation:
National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health laboratory, London NW9 5HT
D. D. Morgan
Affiliation:
National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health laboratory, London NW9 5HT
R. J. Owen
Affiliation:
National Collection of Type Cultures, Central Public Health laboratory, London NW9 5HT
D. R. Morgan
Affiliation:
The Procter and Gamble Company, Miami Valley Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45239-8707, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Twenty-three pre- and post-treatment isolates of Helicobacter pylori from the antral mucosa of eight patients with dyspepsia and gastritis were compared using 1-D SDS PAGE of proteins. The protein patterns were highly reproducible and were used as the basis for two numerical analyses. The first, based on the total protein patterns, showed that a number of the strains did not cluster with their respective patient set. This was thought to be due to differences in both mobility and intensity of proteins in the major band region. The second analysis, based on partial patterns, excluding the major band region (51–68 kDa), divided the clinical isolates into clearly defined groups corresponding to the patient sets. Although there was a degree of heterogeneity with respect to protein pattern between the pre- and post-treatment isolates of some patients, there was nonetheless clear evidence that each patient was harbouring strains of only a single type. These results suggested that patients were not being reinfected with a different strain but that there was recrudescence of the pre-treatment strain. Protein ‘fingerprints’ provided a precise and reproducible means of strain differentiation, and revealed that in each patient the same strain persisted after drug therapy even though there was marked patient-to-patient strain variation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 107 , Issue 3 , December 1991 , pp. 607 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

References

REFERENCES

1.Dooley, CP, Cohen, H. The elinical significance of Campylobacter pylori. Ann Int Med 1988; 108: 70–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lee, A, Hazell, SL. Campylobacter pylori in health and disease: an ecological perspective. Microb Ecol Hlth Dis 1988; 1: 1–16.Google Scholar
3.Walker, SJ, Murrav, AE. A review of Campylobacter pylori in upper gastrointestinal disease. Brit J Hosp Med 1988; July: 27–36.Google ScholarPubMed
4.Mitchell, HM, Lee, A, Bohane, TD. Evidence for person-to-person spread of Campylobacter pylori. In Rathbone, BJ, Heatley, RV, eds. Campylobacter pylori and gastroduodenal disease. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publ., 1989: 197–202.Google Scholar
5.McNulty, CAM, Dent, JC. Rapid identification of Campylobacter pylori (C. pyloridis) by preformed enzymes. J Clin Microbiol 1987; 25: 1683–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Mégraud, F. Morphological and biochemical characterization of Campylobacter pylori. In Menge, H, Gregor, M, Tytgat, GNJ, Marshall, BJ, eds. Campylobacter pylori: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Campylobacter pylori. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 1988: 3–16.Google Scholar
7.McNulty, CAM. Treatment of C. pylori infection: Microbiological viewpoint. In Blaser, MJ. ed. Campylobacter pylori in gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. New York: Igaku-Shoin. 1989: 195–207.Google Scholar
8.Morgan, DR, Fitzpatrick, PM, David, KL, Kraft, WG. Susceptibility patterns of Campylobacter pyloridis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1987; 42: 245–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Majewski, SIH, Goodwin, CS. Restriction endonuclease analysis of the genome of Campylobacter pylori with a rapid extraction method: evidence for considerable genomic variation. J Infect Dis 1988; 157: 465–71.Google Scholar
10.Penfold, SS, Lastovica, AJ, Elisha, BG. Demonstration of plasmids in Campylobacter pylori. J Infect Dis 1988: 157: 850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Goodwin, CS, Armstrong, JA, Peters, M. Microbiology of C. pylori. In Blaser, MJ. ed. Campylobacter pylori in gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. New York: Igaku-Shoin. 1989: 25–49.Google Scholar
12.Ascencio, F, Guruge, Lelwala J, Ljungh, Å, Mégraud, F, Wei, S, Wadström, T. Lectin typing of Campylobacter pylori. Klin Wochenschr 1989; 67 (Suppl XVIII): 2.Google Scholar
13.Jackman, PJH. Bacterial taxonomy based on electrophoretic whole-cell protein patterns. In Goodfellow, M, Minnikin, DE, eds. Chemical methods in bacterial systematics (Society for Applied Bacteriology Technical Series: No. 20.) London: Academic Press 1985: 115–29.Google Scholar
14.Kersters, K. Numerical methods in the classification of bacteria by protein electrophoresis. In Goodfellow, M, Jones, D, Priest, EG, eds. Computer assisted bacterial systematics. London: Academic Press 1985: 337–68.Google Scholar
15.Tabaqchali, S, O'Farrell, S, Holland, D, Silman, R. Method for the typing of Clostridium difficile based on PAGE of [35S]-methionine-labeled proteins. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 23: 197–8.Google Scholar
16.Costas, M, Cookson, BD, Talsania, HG, Owen, RJ. Numerical analysis of electrophoretic protein patterns of methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 2574–81.Google Scholar
17.Stephenson, JR, Crook, SJ, Tabaqchali, S. New method for typing Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin based on sulphur-35 methionine labelled proteins: its application in an outbreak. B M J 1986; 293: 581–3.Google Scholar
18.Costas, M, Sloss, LL, Owen, RJ, Gaston, MA. Evaluation of numerical analysis of SDS-PAGE of protein patterns for typing Enterobacter cloacae. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 103: 265–74.Google Scholar
19.Alexander, M, Rahman, M, Taylor, M, Noble, WC. A study of the value of electrophoretic and other techniques for typing Acinetobacter calcoaceticus. J Hosp Infect 1988; 12: 273–87.Google Scholar
20.Owen, RJ, Costas, M, Morgan, DD, On, SLW, Hill, LR, Pearson, AD, Morgan, DR. One-dimensional electrophoretic protein fingerprints for identifying and typing Campylobacter pylori. In Mégraud, F, Lamouliatte, H, eds. Gastroduodenal pathology and Campylobacter pylori. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ., 1989: 95–8.Google Scholar
21.Owen, RJ, Costas, M, Morgan, DD, On, SLW, Hill, LR, Pearson, AD, Morgan, DR. Strain variation in Campylobacter pylori detected by numerical analysis of one-dimensional electrophoretic protein patterns. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1989; 55: 253–67.Google Scholar
22.Langenberg, W, Rauws, EAJ, Widjojokusomo, A, Tytgat, GNJ, Zanen, HC. Identification of Campylobacter pylori isolates by restriction endonuclease DNA analysis. J Clin Microbiol 1986; 24: 414–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Costas, M, Holmes, B, Sloss, LL. Numerical analysis of electrophoretic protein patterns of Providencia rustigianii strains from human diarrhoea and other sources. J Appl Bacteriol 1987; 63: 319–28.Google Scholar
24.Jackman, PJH, Feltham, RKA, Sneath, PHA. A program in BASIC for numerical taxonomy of micro-organisms based on electrophoretic protein patterns. Microbios Lett 1983; 23: 87–98.Google Scholar
25.Owen, RJ, Beck, A. Evaluation of three procedures using a laser densitometer and microcomputer for estimating molecular sizes of restriction endonuclease digest fragments and application to Campylobacter jejuni chromosomal DNA. Lett Appl Microbiol 1987; 4: 5–8.Google Scholar
26.Costas, M. Numerical analysis of sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic protein patterns for the classification, identification and typing of medically important bacteria. Electrophoresis 1990; 11: 382–91.Google Scholar
27.Owen, RJ, Fraser, J, Costas, M, Morgan, DD, Morgan, DR. Signature patterns of DNA restriction fragments of Helicobacter pylori before and after treatment. J Clin Pathol 1990; 43: 646–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28.Shames, B, Krajden, S, Babida, C, Gurgis, RV, Kurjanczyk, L, Penner, JL. Investigation of Campylobacter pylori strains isolated from a husband and wife. In Mégraud, F, Lamouliatte, H, eds. Gastroduodenal pathology and Campylobacter pylori. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publ., 1989; 439–42.Google Scholar