Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:50:53.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The differential transmissibility of myxoma virus strains of differing virulence grades by the rabbit flea Spilopsyllus cuniculi (Dale)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. R. Mead-Briggs  and
J. A. Vaughan
A. R. Mead-Briggs
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Pest Infestation Control Laboratory, Tangley Place, Worplesdon, Guildford, Surrey
J. A. Vaughan
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Pest Infestation Control Laboratory, Tangley Place, Worplesdon, Guildford, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Laboratory studies showed that few rabbit fleas (Spilopsyllus cuniculi (Dale)) transmitted myxomatosis after removal from wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus (L)) that had been infected for fewer than 10–12 days, irrespective of the virulence of the myxoma virus strain involved. Rabbits infected with fully virulent (Grade I) strains died within 10–15 days and few fleas from these hosts became infective; averaging all the samples taken, 12% of the fleas were infective. Also, few fleas acquired infectivity on individual rabbits which recovered from infection with attenuated strains; the mean was 8% infective. Rabbits which died between 17 and 44 days after infection had higher proportions of infective fleas at all sampling times; the mean was 42% infective. Male and female fleas transmitted virus with equal efficiency.

For rabbits infected with any of the attenuated virus strains the mean percentage of infective fleas was inversely related to the survival time of the host. Rabbits infected with moderately attenuated strains (Grades IIIA and IIIB) had, on average, the highest proportion of infective fleas; hence such strains have a selective advantage and have become predominant under natural conditions in Britain. The changes that might occur if there is an increase in host resistance to myxomatosis are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , October 1975 , pp. 237 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Andrewes, C. H., Thompson, H. V. & Mansi, W. (1959). Myxomatosis: present position and future prospects in Great Britain. Nature, London 184, 1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapple, P. J. & Bowen, E. T. W. (1963). A note on two attenuated strains of myxoma virus isolated in Great Britain. Journal of Hygiene 61, 161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapple, P. J. & Muirhead-Thomson, R. C. (1964). Effect of varying the site of intradermal inoculation of myxoma virus on the course of the disease. Journal of Comparative Pathology 74, 366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, F. (1953). Changes in the mortality-rate due to myxomatosis in the Australian wild rabbit. Nature, London 172, 228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, F. & Chapple, P. J. (1965). Evolutionary changes in myxoma virus in Britain. An examination of 222 naturally occurring strains obtained from 80 counties during the period October-November 1962. Journal of Hygiene 63, 175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, F., Day, M. F. & Woodroofe, G. M. (1952). The mechanism of the transmission of myxomatosis in the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) by the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science 30, 139.Google ScholarPubMed
Fenner, F., Day, M. F. & Woodroofe, G. M. (1956). Epidemiological consequences of the mechanical transmission of myxomatosis by mosquitoes. Journal of Hygiene 54, 284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, F. & Marshall, I. D. (1955). Occurrence of attenuated strains of myxoma virus in Europe. Nature, London 176, 782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, F. & Marshall, I. D. (1957). A comparison of the virulence for European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) of strains of myxoma virus recovered in the field in Australia, Europe and America. Journal of Hygiene 55, 149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenner, F. & Ratcliffe, F. N. (1965). Myxomatosis. CambridgeUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. R., Thompson, H. V. & Mansi, W. (1955). Myxoma virus in Britain. Nature, London 176, 783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacotot, H., Vallée, A. & Virat, B. (1955). Apparition en France d'un mutant naturellement atténué du virus de Sanarelli. Annales de l'institut Pasteur, Paris 89, 361.Google ScholarPubMed
Lockley, R. M. (1954). The European rabbit flea, Spilopsyllus cuniculi, as a vector of myxomatosis in Britain. Veterinary Record 66, 434.Google Scholar
Marshall, I. D. & Douglas, G. W. (1961). Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. VIII. Further observations on changes in the innate resistance of Australian rabbits exposed to myxomatosis. Journal of Hygiene 59, 117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, I. D. & Fenner, F. (1958). Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. V. Changes in the innate resistance of Australian wild rabbits exposed to myxomatosis. Journal of Hygiene 56, 288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, I. D. & Fenner, F. (1960). Studies in the epidemiology of infectious myxomatosis of rabbits. VII. The virulence of strains of myxoma virus recovered from Australian wild rabbits between 1951 and 1959. Journal of Hygiene 58, 485.Google ScholarPubMed
Mead-Briggs, A. R. (1964). Some experiments concerning the interchange of rabbit fleas Spilopsyllus cuniculi (Dale), between living hosts. Journal of Animal Ecology 33, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead-Briggs, A. R. & Vaughan, J. A. (1973). The capture and maintenance of moles and wild rabbits. UFA W Symposium on the Welfare and Management of Wild Animals in Captivity, p. 5.Google Scholar
Muirhead-Thomson, R. C. (1956). Field studies on the role of Anopheles atroparvus in the transmission of myxomatosis in England. Journal of Hygiene 54, 472.Google ScholarPubMed
Mykytowycz, R. (1953). An attenuated strain of the myxomatosis virus recovered from the field. Nature, London 172, 448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, J. (1973). Genetic resistance (of wild rabbits to myxomatosis). Pest Infestation Control. (Combined Report of the Director of the Pest Infestation Control Laboratory 1968—1970). London, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ross, J. (1975). Genetic resistance (of wild rabbits to myxomatosis). Pest Infestation Control, 1971–1973. London, H.M.S.O. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Service, M. W. (1971). A re-appraisal of the role of mosquitoes in the transmission of myxomatosis in Britain. Journal of Hygiene 69, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, H. E. N. & Vaughan, J. A. (1969). Some aspects of the epizootiology of myxomatosis. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 24, 289.Google Scholar