Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T13:26:17.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of skin resistance and hypersensitivity following inactivated vaccinia virus vaccines in rabbits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

T. A. McNeill
T. A. McNeill
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, The Queen's University of Belfast
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A study was made of the development of skin resistance and delayed hyper-sensitivity to vaccinia virus after immunization with inactivated vaccinia virus in rabbits. These vaccines are shown to increase skin resistance, and it is also shown that the development of this resistance is dependent upon the virus content of the vaccine. Skin resistance is shown to be related to the titre of circulating antibody rather than to the degree of delayed hypersensitivity. Possible reasons for conflicting reports in the literature on this subject are discussed.

An unusual skin reaction was seen in some animals when challenged with live virus after immunization with inactivated vaccine. The nature of these reactions is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , March 1966 , pp. 23 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Amies, C. R. (1961). Loss of immunogenic properties of vaccinia virus inactivated by formaldehyde. Can. J. Microbiol. 7, 141.Google Scholar
Andrewes, C. H., Elford, W. J. & Niven, J. S. F. (1948). Vaccinia and ectromelia in the mouse. Br. J. exp. Path. 29, 329.Google Scholar
Beunders, B. J. W., Driessen, J. H. & van den Hoek, C. (1960). Clinical picture and serological response to vaccination with formalinized vaccinia virus followed by scarification with active vaccine in military personnel. Arch. ges. Virusforsch. 10, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussel, M. & Mayzner, M. (1930). Etudes sur la vaccine formolée et sur la réaction variolique C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 103, 411.Google Scholar
Collier, L. H., McClean, D. & Vallet, L. (1955). The antigenicity of ultra-violet irradiated vaccinia virus. J. Hyg., Camb., 53, 513.Google Scholar
Ehrengut, W. (1959). Erfahrungen mit Vakzineantigen. Münch, med. Wschr. 101, 921.Google Scholar
Kaplan, C. (1960). The antigenicity of γ-irradiated vaccinia virus. J. Hyg., Camb., 58, 391.Google Scholar
McNeill, T. A. (1965). The antibody response of rabbits to inactivated vaccinia virus. J. Hyg., Camb., 63, 525.Google Scholar
Parker, R. F. & Rivers, T. M. (1936). Immunological and chemical investigations of vaccine virus. III. Response of rabbits to inactive elementary bodies of vaccinia and to virus-free extracts of vaccine virus. J. exp. Med. 63, 69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RamanaRao, A. V. (1962). The immunogenicity of inactivated vaccinia virus. J. Path. Bact. 84, 367.Google Scholar
Weil, A. J. & Gall, L. S. (1940). Studies on the immunization of rabbits with formalinized vaccine virus. J. Immun. 38, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar