Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:17:26.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of colonization resistance of the digestive tract by biotyping of Enterobacteriaceae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

H. Z. Apperloo-Renkema ,
B. D. Van der Waaij  and
D. Van der Waaij
H. Z. Apperloo-Renkema
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, State University of Groningen, Oostersingel 59, NL-9713 EZ Groningen, The Netherlands
B. D. Van der Waaij
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, State University of Groningen, Oostersingel 59, NL-9713 EZ Groningen, The Netherlands
D. Van der Waaij
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, State University of Groningen, Oostersingel 59, NL-9713 EZ Groningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In studies concerning the effect of antibiotics on faecal microflora, Colonization Resistance is an important parameter. Colonization Resistance correlates inversely with the number of different biotypes of Enterobacteriaceae isolated from faecal samples. Nine healthy volunteers were studied during 6 weeks, in order to determine the natural variation in the number of different biotypes of Enterobacteriaceae per faecal sample. The numbers of biotypes ranged from 1–15 per faecal sample, the mean number of biotypes varied between 2·6 and 7·3 different biotypes per faecal sample per healthy volunteer. Inter-individual variations of five biotypes in the mean number of biotypes per faecal sample are normal. We assessed the minimal number of faecal samples that should be taken for comprehensive biotyping so as to determine reliably the mean number of different biotypes representative for the Colonization Resistance of an individual. It was found that a minimum of four faecal samples was required.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 105 , Issue 2 , October 1990 , pp. 355 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

References

REFERENCES

1.Hentges, DJ. Que, JU. Casey, SW. Stein, AJ. The influence of streptomycin on colonization resistance in mice. Microecol Ther 1984; 14: 53–62.Google Scholar
2.Hofstra, W. Welling, GW, Waaij, D van der. A comparative study of the effect of oral treatment with augmentin, amoxycillin and bacampicillin in the faecal flora in mice. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg [A] 1988; 269: 78–85.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Waaij, D van der. The digestive tract in immunocompromised patients: importance of maintaining its resistance to colonisation, especially in hospital inpatients and those taking antibiotics. In: Sabath, LD, ed. Action of antibiotics in patients. Bern: Hans Hubert Publishers. 1982: 104–18.Google Scholar
4.Waaij, D van der. Speltie, TM, Vossen, JM. Biotyping of Enterobacteriaceae as a test for the evaluation of isolation systems. J Hyg 1972; 70: 639–50.Google ScholarPubMed
5.Waaij, D van der, Speltie, TM, Guinee, PAM, Agterberg, C. Serotyping and biotyping of 160 EschericMa coli strains: comparative study. J Clin Microbiol 1975; 1: 237–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Waaij, D van der, Tieleman-Speltie, TM. De Roeck-Houben, AMJ. Infection by and distribution of biotypes of Enterobacteriaceae species in leukemic patients treated under ward conditions and in units for protective isolation in seven hospitals in Europe. Infection 1977; 3: 188–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Waaij, D van der, Berghuis-de Vries, JM, Lekkerkerk-van der Wees, JEC. Colonization resistance of the digestive tract in conventional and antibiotic-treated mice. J Hyg 1971; 69:405–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Waaij, D van der. Berghuis, JM. Determination of the colonization resistance of the digestive tract of individual mice. J Hyg 1974; 72: 379–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Hahn, DM, Schimpff, SC, Fortner, CL, Smyth, AC, Young, VM, Wiernik, PH. Infection in acute leukemia patients receiving oral nonabsorbable antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1978: 13: 958–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Waaij, D van der, Tieleman-Speltie, TM, De Roeck-Houben, AMJ. Infection by and distribution of biotypes of Enterobacteriaceae species in leukaemic patients treated under ward conditions and in units for protective isolation in seven hospitals in Europe. Infection 1977; 5: 188–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Waaij, D van der, Tieleman-Speltie, TM, De Roeck-Houben, AMJ. Relation between the faecal concentration of various potentially pathogenic microorganisms and infections in individuals (mice) with severely decreased resistance to infection. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1978; 44: 395–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Tancrède, CH. Andremont, AO. Bacterial translocation and gramnegative bacteremia in patients with hematological malignancies. J Infect Dis 1985; 152: 99–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Schimpff, SC, Young, VM, Greene, WH, Vermeulen, GD. Moody, MR. Wiernik, PH. Origin of infection in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Significance of hospital acquisition of potential pathogens. Ann Intern Med 1972; 77: 707–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed