Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:43:50.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection of campylobacter in gastroenteritis: comparison of direct PCR assay of faecal samples with selective culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1998

A. J. LAWSON
Affiliation:
Molecular Biology Unit, Virus Reference Division, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale, London, UK
M. S. SHAFI
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Central Middlesex NHS Trust Hospital, London, UK
K. PATHAK
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Central Middlesex NHS Trust Hospital, London, UK
J. STANLEY
Affiliation:
Molecular Biology Unit, Virus Reference Division, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale, London, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The prevalence of campylobacter gastroenteritis has been estimated by bacterial isolation using selective culture. However, there is evidence that certain species and strains are not recovered on selective agars. We have therefore compared direct PCR assays of faecal samples with campylobacter culture, and explored the potential of PCR for simultaneous detection and identification to the species level. Two hundred unselected faecal samples from cases of acute gastroenteritis were cultured on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar and subjected to DNA extraction and PCR assay. Culture on CCDA indicated that 16 of the 200 samples contained ‘Campylobacter spp.’. By contrast, PCR assays detected campylobacters in 19 of the 200 samples, including 15 of the culture-positive samples, and further identified them as: C. jejuni (16), C. coli (2) and C. hyointestinalis (1). These results show that PCR offers a different perspective on the incidence and identity of campylobacters in human gastroenteritis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press