Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:57:57.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics: V. Analysis of experimental epidemics of mouse-typhoid; a bacterial disease conferring incomplete immunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

W. O. Kermack
Affiliation:
From the Laboratory of the Royal College of Physicians, Edinburgh
A. G. McKendrick
Affiliation:
From the Laboratory of the Royal College of Physicians, Edinburgh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a recently published paper (Kermack & McKendrick, 1937) the observational data relating to epidemics of ectromelia in populations of mice maintained under experimental conditions (Greenwood et al. 1936) has been analysed in the light of a mathematical theory of epidemics developed by us during recent years (Kermack & McKendrick, 1927, 1932, 1933, 1936). It was shown that the life table giving the chance of mice surviving for various lengths of time in infected communities is very closely represented by a formula calculated on the assumption that the various rates—infection rate, recovery rate, death rate, etc.—are constants. It is, of course, realized that this simplifying assumption can only be regarded as approximately true. It renders the application of the general theory practicable, and the result of the investigation justifies its use, in so far as the theory so simplified does actually conform to the experimental results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

References

REFERENCES

Greenwood, , Newbold, , Topley, & Wilson, (1930). J. Hyg., Camb., 30, 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, , Bradford Hill, , Topley, & Wilson, (1936). Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun., Lond., no. 209.Google Scholar
Kermack, & McKendrick, (1927). Proc. roy. Soc. A, 115, 700.Google Scholar
Kermack, & McKendrick, (1932). Proc. roy. Soc. A, 138, 55.Google Scholar
Kermack, & McKendrick, (1933). Proc. roy. Soc. A, 141, 94.Google Scholar
Kermack, & McKendrick, (1936). Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. series 2, 41, 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kermack, & McKendrick, (1937). J. Hyg., Camb., 37, 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar