Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:16:38.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contaminated first-aid dressings: Report of a Working Party of the PHLS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. R. Marples
R. R. Marples
Affiliation:
Secretary to the Working Party*, Division of Hospital Infection, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In a collaborative study 12 Public Health Laboratory Service laboratories and the Division of Hospital Infection, Central Public Health Laboratory, investigated the degree of contamination of standard dressings produced by manufacturers in India or in England by a comparison of the results of culture of 25 sterilized dressings with those of 25 untreated dressings. Of the 38 batches of dressings made in India 27 (71 %) were judged contaminated and another six could be so judged when Bacillus species were examined. In two batches laboratory contamination precluded a judgement and only three batches passed the test. Of the 27 batches made in England, only three gave any evidence of contamination at the lowest level of significance. Repeat investigation of one of these batches gave no evience of contamination.

Organisms of the genus Bacillus and fungi were associated with contamination; micrococci and propionibacteria were laboratory contaminants. There was evidence for both failure of sterilization and of contamination after sterilization during the manufacture of dressings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , April 1983 , pp. 241 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous (1982). Investigation of first-aid dressings claimed to be sterile. Note by DHSS laid in the Library of the House of Commons, 26 January.Google Scholar
British Pharmacopoeia (1980). London: Her Majesty's Stationary Office. Appendix XVI, pp. A 186–190.Google Scholar
Dadd, A. H., Dagnall, V. P., Everall, P. H. & Jones, A. C. (1970). The survival of Strepto coccus pyogenes on bacteriological swabs made from various fibres. Journal of Medical Microbiology 3, 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Pharmacopoeia (1971). Vol. ii, pp. 53–57. Maisonneuve S.A. 57 Sainte Ruffine.Google Scholar
Silverman, G. J., & Sinskey, A. J. (1977). Sterilization by ionising radiation. In Disinfection, Sterilization and Preservation, 2nd ed. (ed. Black, S. S.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febriger.Google Scholar
The Pharmaceutical Codex (1979). 11th ed., pp. 896–897. London: Pharmaceutical Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, S., Dawes, C. E. & Hay, N. P. (1981). Microbiological contamination of imported wound dressings. Pharmaceutical Journal, 19 December, p. 26.Google Scholar
Whitehead, J. E. M. (1982). Report to the Secretary of State for Social Services on microbial contamination of non-adhesive ‘sterile’ first-aid dressings. Laid in the Library of the House of Commons, May.Google Scholar