Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:50:14.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Congenital Cataract Following German Measles in the Mother

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

N. McAlister Gregg
N. McAlister Gregg
Affiliation:
Sydney
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

IN the first half of the year, 1941, an unusual number of cases of congenital cataract made their appearance in Sydney. Cases of similar type, which appeared during the same period, have since been reported from widely separated parts of Australia. Their frequency, unusual characteristics and wide distribution warranted closer investigation, and this report is an attempt to bring to notice some of the more important features of what might almost be regarded as a mild epidemic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 107 , Issue 1 , August 1991 , pp. iii - xiv
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

References

REFERENCES

(1) Elder, W. Stewart Duke: “Text Book of Ophthalmology”, Volume ii, page 1364.Google Scholar
(2) Scammon, Richard E. and Armstrong, Ellery N.: “On the Growth of the Human Eyeball and Optic Nerve”, Journal of Comparative Neurology, Volume xxxviii, 1924–1925, page 165.Google Scholar
(3) Kirby, Daniel B.: “The Eye and its Diseases”, edited by Berens, C., 1936, page 577.Google Scholar
(4) Elder, W. Stewart Duke: Loco citato, page 1365.Google Scholar
(5) Jaensch, P. A.: “Anatomische Untersuchungen eines angeborenen Totalstars”, Archiv für Ophthalmologie, Volume cxv, 1924, page 81.Google Scholar
(6) Elder, W. Stewart Duke: Loco citato, page 1366.Google Scholar
(7) Mann, Ida: “Developmental Abnormalities of the Eye”, 1937, page 18.Google Scholar
(8) Ballantyne, J. W.: “Manual of Antenatal Pathology and Hygiene”, 1902, Part 1, page 196.Google Scholar