Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-25T13:10:08.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A complement fixation technique for the quantitative measurement of antigenic differences between strains of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

John Davie
John Davie
Affiliation:
The Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A complement fixation test has been developed to measure the minor antigenic differences which occur between strains of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease of the same immunological type.

2. Strain-specific sera were prepared from each of the virus strains examined and then titrated with each of the antigens.

3. The amounts of complement fixed in each reaction were measured in the region of maximal fixation where the antigen and antibody were present in optimal proportions.

4. Heterologous antigen-antibody reactions were compared with the homologous reaction in each test and expressed as cross-fixation ratios.

5. Pairs of antigens could then be compared by taking the product of their cross-fixation ratios one with the other. The values of cross-fixation product so obtained ranged from 1·0 between identical strains to 0·01 between strains of different immunological type.

6. Strains of virus which exhibit cross-fixation products of 0·5 or more with one another have been classified within subtype groups.

I wish to acknowledge the guidance and encouragement of Dr J. B. Brooksby, Director of the Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, and the technical assistance of Mr E. Scoates.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 62 , Issue 4 , December 1964 , pp. 401 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

References

REFERENCES

Bedson, S. P., Maitland, H. B. & Burbury, Y. M. (1927). The comparison of a strain of virus from Sweden with the strains ‘G.F.’ and Vallée A by immunity tests in guinea pigs. Progr. Rep. Ft Mth Dis. Res. Comm. 2, 98.Google Scholar
Bradish, C. J. & Brooksby, J. B. (1960). Complement fixation studies of the specificity of the interactions between components of the virus system of foot-and-mouth disease and its antibodies. J. gen. Microbiol. 22, 405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradish, C. J., Brooksby, J. B. & Tsubahara, H. (1960). The complement fixation test in studies of components of the virus system of foot-and-mouth disease and its antibodies. J. gen. Microbiol. 22, 392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooksby, J. B. (1952). The technique of complement fixation in foot-and-mouth disease research. A.R.C. Rep. Ser. No. 12.Google Scholar
Brooksby, J. B., Galloway, I. A. & Henderson, W. M. (1948). Strains of virus of foot-and-mouth disease recovered from outbreaks in Mexico. Complement fixation tests. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 69, 70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davie, J. (1962). The classification of subtype variants of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease. Bull. Off. int. Epiz. 57, 962.Google Scholar
Galloway, I. A., Henderson, W. M. & Brooksby, J. B. (1948). Strains of virus of foot-and-mouth disease recovered from outbreaks in Mexico. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 69, 57.Google Scholar
Girard, H., Mackowiak, C. & Robin, J. C. (1952). Notion de variante en matière de virus aphteux. Bull. Soc. Sci. vét., Lyon, 54, 83.Google Scholar
Graves, J. H. (1960). The differentiation of subtypes (variants) of foot-and-mouth disease virus by serological methods. I. Complement-fixation test. Amer. J. vet. Res. 21, 83, 687.Google ScholarPubMed
Hyslop, St N. G., Davie, J. & Carter, S. P. (1963). Antigenic differences between strains of foot-and-mouth disease virus of type SAT 1. J. Hyg., Camb., 61, 217.Google Scholar
Martin, W. B., Davies, E. B. & Smith, I. M. (1962). The immunization of cattle with a mouse adapted strain of type SAT 2 of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease. Res. vet Sci. 3, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelsen, E. & Thiesen, K. S. (1951). A variant type of foot-and-mouth disease virus from Venezuela. Nord. VetMed. 3, 1061.Google Scholar
Nobili, I. (1962). On the adaptation in calf kidney tissue cultures of foot-and-mouth disease O58 virus. Bull. Off. int. Epiz. 57, 627.Google Scholar
Rice, C. E. & Brooksby, J. B. (1953). Studies of the complement fixation reaction in virus systems. V. In foot-and-mouth disease using direct and indirect methods. J. Immunol. 71, 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. (1950). Ueber weitere Varianten der Typen A und B des Maul-und-Klauen seuchevirus unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Seuchenzuges 1948–49 in Westdeutschland. Berl. Münch. tierärztl. Wschr. 3, 47.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. & Kosch, W. (1951). Typing of a foot-and-mouth disease strain from Venezuela. Berl. Münch. tierärztl. Wschr. 2, 36.Google Scholar
Traub, E. & Möhlmann, H. (1946). Untersuchungen über immunologische Varianten der Typen A und B des Maul-und-Klauenseuchevirus. Berl. Münch. tierärztl. Wschr. 1, 1.Google Scholar
Ubertini, B. (1951). Observations et recherches sur les différents virus de la fièvre aphteuse qui ont sévi dans la plaine du Pô pendant les dix dernières années. Bull. Off. int. Epiz. 35, 627.Google Scholar
Ubertini, B. (1954). Les variantes du virus aphteux. Bull. Off. int. Epiz. 41, 768.Google Scholar