Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:16:56.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative study of spirochaetes from the porcine alimentary tract

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

Ruth M. Lemcke  and
M. R. Burrows
Ruth M. Lemcke
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Berkshire. RG16 0NN, England
M. R. Burrows
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Institute for Research on Animal Diseases, Compton, Berkshire. RG16 0NN, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Strains of Treponema hyodysenteriae capable of inducing swine dysentery in specific pathogen-free pigs were compared with other spirochaetes from the porcine alimentary tract by biochemical and serological tests and by electrophoresis of their proteins. Carbohydrate fermentation and esculin hydrolysis were similar in all the spirochaetes. Indole was produced by T. hyodysenteriae and by some of the other spirochaetes. Analysis of the fatty acids produced from glucose showed a difference between T. hyodysenteriae and other spirochaetes only in the amount of n-butyric acid produced. The indirect fluorescent antibody test showed extensive cross-reactions between all the spirochaetes unless antisera were first absorbed. A microtitre agglutination test and a growth-inhibition test were both more specific; strains of T. hyodysenteriae could be distinguished from the other spirochaetes using unabsorbed sera. Both tests revealed some antigenic heterogeneity among strains of T. hyodysenteriae. The cell proteins of a single strain of T. hyodysenteriae gave an electrophoretic pattern distinct from those of the other spirochaetes.

Two of the six spirochaetes not associated with swine dysentery, PWS/B and PWS/C, were indistinguishable serologically and electrophoretically. The other four strains were serologically distinct from one another and from PWS/B and PWS/C. Only two of these spirochaetes were examined electrophoretically, but each gave a different pattern from PWS/B and PWS/C. The diversity observed among spirochaetes not associated with swine dysentery indicates that their suggested inclusion in a single species, T. innocens, may prove to be unjustified.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 86 , Issue 2 , April 1981 , pp. 173 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

References

REFERENCES

Baum, D. H. & Joens, L. A. (1979 a). Serotypes of beta-haemolytic Treponema hydoysenteriae. Infection & Immunity 25, 792–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, D. H. & Joens, L. A. (1979 b). Partial purification of a specific antigen of Treponema hyodysenteriae. Infection & Immunity 26, 1211–1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burrows, M. R. & Lemcke, R. M. (1981). The identification of Treponema hyodysenteriae by a rapid slide agglutination test. Veterinary Record (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, D. L., Glock, R. D., Christensen, C. R. & Kinyon, J. M. (1972). Swine dysentery. I. Inoculation of pigs with Treponema hyodysenteriae (new species) and reproduction of the disease. Veterinary Medicine and Small Animal Clinician 67, 61–64.Google Scholar
Holdeman, L. V., Cato, E. P. & Moore, W. E. C. (1977). Anaerobe Laboratory Manual, 4th ed.Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University Anaerobe Laboratory, Blacksburg, Va.Google Scholar
Hudson, M. J., Alexander, T. J. L. & Lysons, R. J. (1976). Diagnosis of swine dysentery: spirochaetes which may be confused with Treponema hyodysenteriae. Veterinary Record 99, 498–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, R., Olander, H. J., Gallina, A. M. & Morrow, M. E. (1972). Swine dysentery. Induction and characterization in isolated colonic loops. Veterinary Pathology 9, 22–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, D. & Clark, A. (1975). The direct fluorescent antibody test for the detection of Treponema hyodysenteriae in pigs. Research in Veterinary Science 19, 98–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, D. & Saunders, C. N. (1977). Diagnosis of swine dysentery using an absorbed fluorescent antiserum. Veterinary Record 101, 303–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joens, L. A., Harris, D. L., Kinyon, J. M. & Kaeberle, M. L. (1978). Microtitre agglutination for detection of Treponema hyodysenteriae antibody. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 8, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joens, L. A., Kinyon, J. M., Baum, D. H. & Harris, D. L. (1978). Immunofluorescent studies on Treponema hyodysenteriae.Proceedings 5th Congress International Pig Veterinary Society, M2.Google Scholar
Kinyon, J. M. & Harris, D. L. (1979). Treponema innocens, a new species of intestinal bacteria, and emended description of the type strain of Treponema hyodysenteriae. Harris, et al. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 29, 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinyon, J. M., Harris, D. L. & Glock, R. D. (1977). Enteropathogenicity of various isolates of Treponema hyodysenteriae. Infection & Immunity 15, 638–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemcke, R. M., Bew, J., Burrows, M. R. & Lysons, R. J. (1979). The growth of Treponema hyodysenteriae and other porcine intestinal spirochaetes in a liquid medium. Research in Veterinary Science 26, 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemcke, R. M. & Burrows, M. R. (1979). A disc growth-inhibition test for differentiating Treponema hyodysenteriae from other intestinal spirochaetes. Veterinary Record 104, 548–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miao, R. M., Fieldsteel, A. H. & Harris, D. L. (1978). Genetics of Treponema: characterization of Treponema hyodysenteriae and its relationship to Treponema pallidum. Infection & Immunity 22, 736–739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, K. D. (1976). A simple and sensitive technique for determining the fermentation reactions of non-sporing anaerobes. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 41, 325–328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Razin, S. (1968). Mycoplasma taxonomy studied by electrophoresis of cell proteins. Journal of Bacteriology 96, 687–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, C. N. & Hunter, D. (1974). A fluorescent antibody staining technique for the diagnosis of swine dysentery. Veterinary Record 94, 491–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, D. J. & Alexander, T. J. L. (1971). The production of dysentery in swine by feeding cultures containing a spirochaete. British Veterinary Journal 127, lviii–lxi.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terpstra, J. I., Akkermans, J. P. W. M. & Ouwerkerk, H. (1968). Investigations into the etiology of vibrionic dysentery (Doyle) in pigs. Netherlands Journal of Veterinary Science 1, 5–13.Google Scholar
Whipp, S. C., Harris, D. L., Kinyon, J. M., Songer, J. G. & Glock, R. D. (1978). Enteropathogenicity testing of Treponema hyodysenteriae in ligated colonic loops of swine. American Journal of Veterinary Research 39, 1293–1296.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilcock, B. P. & Olander, H. J. (1979). Studies on the pathogenesis of swine dysentery. I. Characterization of the lesions in colons and colonic segments inoculated with pure cultures or colonic content containing Treponema hyodysenteriae. Veterinary Pathology 16, 450–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed