Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-02T05:20:31.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative field trial, conducted without pre-treatment census baiting, of the rodenticides zinc phosphide, thallium sulphate and gophacide against Rattus norvegicus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

B. D. Rennison
B. D. Rennison
Affiliation:
Pest Infestation Control Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Hook Rise South, Tolworth, Surbiton, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effectiveness of the single-dose poison treatments of farm rat infestations, analysed by comparing the weights of the post-treatment census bait takes in covariance with the weights of the prebait takes, showed that treatments with 2·5% zinc phosphide, 0·3% thallium sulphate or 0·3% gophacide were equally effective and significantly better than were treatments with 1% zinc phosphide or 0·1% thallium sulphate. The methodology and sensitivity of different analyses are also considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 77 , Issue 1 , August 1976 , pp. 55 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

References

REFERENCES

Becker, L. (1952). Experiments in determining the usual doses for rat poison. Schädlingsbekämpfung 44, (6), 98–105.Google Scholar
Brooks, J. E. (1973). A review of commensal rodents and their control. Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, 3, (4), 405–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitty, D. (1954). In Chitty & Southern (1954), ch.4.Google Scholar
Chitty, D. & Southern, H. N. (1954). Control of Rats and Mice, 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davis, R. A. (1970). Control of Rats and Mice. M.A.F.F. Bulletin No 181, 2nd ed. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Doty, R. E. (1945). Rat Control on Hawaiian Sugar Plantations. The Hawaiian Planters Record. XLIX, (2), 71–239.Google Scholar
Drummond, D. C. & Rennison, B. D. (1973). The detection of rodent resistance to anticoagulants. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 48, 239–42.Google ScholarPubMed
Gratz, N. G. (1973). A critical review of currently used single-dose rodenticides. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 48, 469–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Howard, W. E. & Marsh, R. E. (1974). Rodent Control Manual. Pest Control, 42, (8), D-U. Reprinted as Rat Control Manual with editorial corrections and extra figures and captions.Google Scholar
Lund, M. (1971). Annual Report 1970. Danish Pest Infestation Laboratory, Lyngby, Denmark.Google Scholar
Redfern, R., Greaves, J. H. & Tinworth, H. (1975). Laboratory evaluation of gophacide as a rodenticide for use against Rattus norvegicus and Mus musculus. Journal of Hygiene 73, 103–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennison, B. D. (1974). Field trials of calciferol against warfarin resistant infestations of Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus Berk.). Journal of Hygiene 73, 361–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rennison, B. D. & Hadler, M. R. (1975). Field trials of difenacoum against warfarin resistant infestations of Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Hygiene 74, 449–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rennison, B. D., Hammond, L. E. & Jones, G. L. (1968). A comparative trial of norbormide and zinc phosphide against Rattus norvegicus on farms. Journal of Hygiene 66, 147–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods. 6th ed. Ames, Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, H. V. (1954). In Chitty & Southern (1954). Ch. 7.Google Scholar
WHO (1973). Safe Use of Pesticides. Technical Report No. 513. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar