Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:59:53.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Commentary on Recent Plague Investigations in Transbaikalia and Southern Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. F. Petrie
Affiliation:
Lister Institute, Elstree, Herts.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although much work on the epidemiology of plague has been done in many parts of the world since the discovery of the Bacillus pestis in 1894, the origin of the outbreaks in Eastern and Southern Russia has, until a short time ago, remained obscure. Transbaikalia, together with extensive areas of Northern Manchuria and North-east Mongolia that are conterminous with it, and, again, the region in Southern Russia which includes the Kirghese and Kalmuck steppes and especially that portion of it which lies between the lower reaches of the rivers Volga and Ural have long been known to contain endemic foci of plague, and have been the source of considerable outbreaks of pneumonic plague. Thus, in the winter of 1878–79, an outbreak of this type at Vetlianka, a Cossack village on the right bank of the Volga, caused alarm in Western Europe. Competent epidemiologists–British, French and German–visited the village after the event, and examined the circumstances that favoured the spread of the infection. Their observations were brought together and analysed by Netten Radcliffe (1881) in his memorandum on plague, which gives the first adequate description of a pneumonic plague epidemic. The more recent epidemics of pneumonic plague, namely, those of Manchuria in 1910–11 with 50,000 deaths, Middle China in 1917–18 with 15,000 deaths, and Manchuria in 1920–21 with 9000 deaths, owed their origin to ill-defined centres of infection in the immense tract of land which includes Transbaikalia and which is contiguous to the north-west boundary of China.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1924

References

REFERENCES

Clemow, Frank (1900). Plague in Siberia and Mongolia, and the tarbagan. Journ. of Trop. Med. p. 170.Google Scholar
Dudchenko, (1909). [Journ. of General Hygiene, and Legal and Practical Medicine.] Petrograd.Google Scholar
Jettmar, H. M. (1923). Erfahrungen über die Pest in Transbaikalien. Zeitschr. für Hyg. vol. XCVII. p. 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrie, G. F. (1912). Observations on the flea infestation of the tarbagan, in Report of the International Plague Conference, p. 235. Manila.Google Scholar
Petrie, G. F. and MajorRonald, E.Todd, R.A.M.C. (1923). A Report on Plague Investigations in Egypt. Government Press, Cairo.Google Scholar
Radcliffe, Netten, J. (1881). Memorandum on the progress of Levantine Plague in 18781879, including the reappearance of the disease in Europe, contained in Ninth Annual Report of the Local Government Board, 1878–80.Google Scholar
Sticker, Georg, (1908). Der Ursprung und die Entwickelung der Pest, in Die Pest, p. 400. Giessen.Google Scholar
Sticker, Georg, (1910). Die Wirte und Opfer der Pest in der Tierwelt, in Die Pest, p. 118. Giessen.Google Scholar
Strong, R. P. (1912). The susceptibility of the tarbagan to plague infection, in Report of the International Plague Conference, p. 237. Manila.Google Scholar
Tscherkassow, (1884). Erinnerungen eines Jägers aus Ostsibirien, 1856–63. Cited by Sticker in Die Pest. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Teh, Wu Lien (Tuck, G. L.) (1913). First Report of the North Manchurian Plague Prevention Service. Journ. of Hyg. vol. XIII. p. 237.Google Scholar
Teh, Wu Lien (1922). Article on Pneumonic Plague, in The Practice of Medicine in the Tropics, edited by W., Byam and Archibald, R. G., vol. II. p. 1038.Google Scholar
Teh, Wu Lien (1924). A further note on natural and experimental plague in tarbagans. Journ. of Hyg. vol. XXII. p. 329.Google Scholar
Zabolotny, D. (1923). L'origine de la peste endémique. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, vol. XXXVII. P. 618.Google Scholar