Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:54:07.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Combining Affinities in Bacterial Variation and Carcinogenesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Arthur Eastwood
Affiliation:
(From the Pathological Laboratory of the Ministry of Health.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although knowledge of principles determining variation is imperfect, some progress has been made and further help may be obtained from some of the newer conceptions about combining affinities regulating normal growth. There are reasons to believe that growth depends on a rhythmic cycle of synthesis, peculiar to living protein, whereby at each successive stage one particular “building stone” is selected for synthesis, with rejection of all others. There is also some evidence that the surface of a growing bacterium passes through periodic phases. Additional light on the activities of the bacterial surface is thrown by the new conception of enzymes which regards them not as fixed chemical entities but as chemico-physical “centres of activity.”

Some of the principles which are gradually coming to light in bacterial variation may ultimately be of assistance in the much more obscure problem of explaining the change from the normal mammalian cell to its malignant variant. I refer in particular to conceptions, which I have discussed in the preceding part of this article, about the mechanism of cellular growth and the nature of a cell's combining affinities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

References

page 302 note 1 Lancet, 09 6th, 1930, p. 509.Google Scholar

page 303 note 1 Colloid Science applied to Biology, London: The Faraday Society, 1931.Google Scholar

page 304 note 1 J. Hyg. 28, 139, 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 304 note 2 Med. Res. Counc. Bacteriology, 1, 138, 1930.Google Scholar

page 304 note 3 Med. Res. Counc. Bacteriology, 1, 179, 1930.Google Scholar

page 305 note 1 Med. Res. Counc. Bacteriology, 1, 369, 1930.Google Scholar

page 311 note 1 J. Hyg. 27, 113, 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 311 note 2 J. Exp. Med. 51, 99 and 123, 1930, and Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med. 27, 989, 06, 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

page 316 note 1 Communications de l'Institute Sérothérapique de l'État Danois, Tome 20, 1930, p. 477.Google Scholar

page 317 note 1 J. Hyg. 29, 124–7, 1929.Google Scholar

page 328 note 2 J. Hyg. 29, 117–31, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar