Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T14:31:29.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cholera: possible infection from aircraft effluent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

C. J. M. Rondle
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St (Gower St), London W.C.l
B. Ramesh
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St (Gower St), London W.C.l
J. B. Krahn
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St (Gower St), London W.C.l
R. Sherriff
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St (Gower St), London W.C.l
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper presents the hypothesis that some cases of cholera might be due to effluent discharge from aircraft. The theoretical case is borne out by inspection of data on the physical conditions pertaining between high altitudes and ground level. A study of the distribution of isolated outbreaks and single cases of disease and their relation to major airline routes showed a reasonable correspondence. Sporadic outbreaks of cholera in Europe between 1970 and 1975 were found to lie within the flight paths of regular airline services from Calcutta, where cholera is endemic, to the Northern Hemisphere. Laboratory studies on the stability of Vibrio cholerae to conditions likely to be encountered in droplets falling from high altitude to the ground suggested that significant numbers of organisms might survive. It should be noted that in this study no account was taken of the effect of ultra-violet light on viability and it is known that at high altitudes the ultraviolet light component of solar radiation is much higher than at ground level. Results of experiments where small numbers of organisms were inoculated into relatively poor media showed that rapid growth ensued and that sufficient organisms were produced to give an infective dose of Vibrio cholerae in 1–10 ml/fluid. It could be concluded that human infection could easily occur by ingestion of fluids such as milk or soup which had some time earlier received a fortuitous but slight contamination from the air. Investigation of one disinfectant (chloramine T) showed that it reacted rapidly and in a complex manner with peptone. One effect of this reaction was the elimination of bactericidal activity and it seems likely that, as at present employed, chloramine T is of doubtful value in aeroplanehygiene. One important conclusion that arises from this work is that if cholera can be spread, even only occasionally, by effluent from aircraft then close investigation should be made of the possibility of other bacteria and viruses being spread in a similar way.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

References

REFERENCES

Bruce-Chwatt, L. J. (1974). Air transport and disease. Journal of Biosocial Science 6, 241–58.Google ScholarPubMed
Cash, R. A., Music, S. I., Libonatt, J. P., Snyder, M. J., Wenael, R. P. & Hornick, R. B. (1974). Response in man to infection with Vibrio cholerae. 1. Clinical, serologic and bacteriologic responses to a known inoculum. Journal of Infectious Diseases 129, 4551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansueto, S. & Migneco, G. (1974). L'epidemiologia del colera in relazione ai moderni mezza di trasporto. Minerva Medica 65, 4227–32.Google Scholar
Miles, A. A. & Misra, S. S. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. Journal of Hygiene 38, 732–49.Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization (1970 a). Weekly Epidemiological Record 45, 391.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1970 b). Weekly Epidemiological Record 45, 403.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1970 c). Weekly Epidemiological Record 45, 494.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1970 d). Weekly Epidemiological Record 45, 534.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1974 a). Weekly Epidemiological Record 48, 180.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1974 b). Weekly Epidemiological Record 48, 196.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1974 c). Weekly Epidemiological Record 48, 223.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1974 d). Weekly Epidemiological Record 48, 337.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1975). Weekly Epidemiological Record 49, 219.Google Scholar