Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:41:10.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of VP7 and VP4 genes of rotavirus strains: 1990–1994 and 2000–2002

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2008

J. K. ZADE
Affiliation:
National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India
P. CHHABRA
Affiliation:
National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India
S. D. CHITAMBAR*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Virology, Pune, Maharashtra, India
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr S. D. Chitambar, Deputy Director & Group leader, Rotavirus Group, National Institute of Virology, 20-A, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Pune – 411 001, Maharashtra, India. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A total of 90 rotavirus-positive faecal specimens collected from patients hospitalized with diarrhoea in 1990–1994 (n=77) and 2000–2002 (n=13) were investigated for VP7 and VP4 genotypes. The specimens included 21 typable and 69 non-reactive or multireactive rotavirus strains as monitored by monoclonal antibody-based serotyping ELISA. Genotyping was carried out by multiplex PCR/sequencing using primers specific for both VP7 and VP4 genes. The contribution of common genotypes (G1P[8], G2P[4], G3P[8], G4P[8]) in causing rotavirus diarrhoea was 79·2% and 92·3% in the years 1990–1994 and 2000–2002, respectively, while G9P[8] infections were detected at lower levels (1·3% and 7·7%) at both time-points. There was a predominance of G1P[8] in 1990–1994 and of G2P[4] in 2000–2002. The detection of unusual rotavirus strains (G1P[6], G1P[4], G1P[19], G2P[8], G3P[4], G4P[6]) in 19·5% of the patients indicated a significant contribution of reassortants in causing diarrhoea in western India.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Cambridge University Press

INTRODUCTION

Group A rotaviruses are recognized as the single most common cause of non-bacterial acute gastroenteritis. These viruses infect children throughout the world in the first few years of life irrespective of geographic location and socioeconomic status [Reference Cook1]. It has been estimated that rotavirus infections are associated with about 600 000 deaths of children aged <5 years annually in developing countries [Reference Parashar2].

Rotaviruses belong to the Reoviridae family and possess a genome of 11 segments of double-stranded RNA. A dual classification system has been established for rotaviruses based on two outer layer proteins, VP7 and VP4, respectively. The major neutralization epitopes on the VP7 protein have been designated as antigenic region A (amino acids 87–99), region B (amino acids 145–150) and region C (amino acids 211–223) [Reference Dyall-Smith3]. Earlier, typing of this protein involved monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based serotyping ELISA. However, a lack of readily available mAbs hampered VP4 serotyping [Reference Estes, Fields, Knipe, Howley, Chanock, Monath and Melnick4]. In recent years, application of molecular methods has allowed identification of 19 G types and 27 P types in human and animal infections [Reference Matthijnssens5]. Although clinically and epidemiologically, G1–G4 serotypes and P[8] and P[4] genotypes have acquired global importance [Reference Gentsch6, Reference Palombo7], geographical variation in the distribution of G and P types along with emergence of unusual G/P combinations have also been reported from different countries [Reference Santos and Hoshino8, Reference Gentsch9].

Data on rotavirus disease and strain surveillance have been reported from various parts of India [Reference Kang10]. In a study conducted on faecal specimens collected from patients hospitalized with acute diarrhoea from western India during 1990–1994, serotyping of rotavirus strains was carried out using mAbs to the G1–G4, G6 and G10 serotypes [Reference Kelkar and Ayachit11]. Only 25·6% of the strains were typed whereas the majority of the strains remained untypable due to non-reactivity or multireactivity. The aim of the present study was to characterize VP7 and VP4 genes of rotavirus strains representing both the categories.

METHODS

Specimens

The faecal specimens investigated in the study were collected from patients with acute diarrhoea admitted at local hospitals in Pune in 1990–1994. The patients included 85 children aged 3 months to 7 years, and five adults aged 20–38 years. Twenty-one typable (G1/G2/G3/G4) and 56 untypable strains as monitored by mAb-based serotyping ELISA [Reference Kelkar and Ayachit11] were selected for the study. Thirteen specimens collected during 2000–2002 and categorized as untypable were also investigated. Informed consent was obtained from the parents/guardians of children with diarrhoea and from adult patients prior to the sample collection.

RNA extraction and G and P typing

The faecal samples were processed to prepare 20% suspensions in 0·01 m PBS (pH 7·2), centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C and stored at −70°C until tested. The viral RNA was extracted using Trizol LS (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The VP7 and VP4 genes were amplified by one-step RT–PCR and genotyping was carried out by multiplex PCR using primer sets and protocols described previously [Reference Gouvea12Reference Berois15]. The PCR products were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide and visualized under a UV transilluminator.

Nucleotide sequencing

The strains that could not be typed by multiplex PCR were subjected to sequencing of first PCR product using Beg9 and End9 primers for the VP7 gene and con2 and con3 primers for the VP4 gene [Reference Gouvea12, Reference Gentsch14]. Briefly, the amplicons of VP7 and VP4 genes were purified on minicolumns using the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Sequencing was carried out using ABI-Prism Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and an ABI-Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The nucleotide sequences of VP7 and VP4 genes of rotavirus strains reported in this study were deposited in the GenBank under the accession numbers DQ 886942–887001 and DQ 887002–DQ 887060, respectively.

Phylogenetic analysis

Nucleotide sequences of both the genes were aligned in Clustal W and phylogenetic trees were generated using a Kimura two-parameter distance model and Neighbour-Joining (NJ) algorithm [Reference Thompson16, Reference Kumar, Tamura and Nei17]. The reliability of the phylogenetic tree was tested by applying a bootstrap test with 1000 bootstrap replications.

RESULTS

G typing

The VP7 genes of all 90 strains in the study were typed. Of these, 35 were typed by multiplex PCR and the remaining 55 by sequencing the first PCR product. Of the 21 strains typed by ELISA, 20 showed the presence of the same G type in multiplex PCR/sequencing (G1–6, G2–5, G3–5 and G4–4) while one strain showed discordance (G4 vs. G2). Among the 69 rotavirus strains untypable by ELISA, G1–G4 and G9 specificities were detected in 35, 27, 2, 2 and 2 strains, respectively. Overall the G-type distribution in 1990–1994 showed the presence of G1 in 50·6%, G2 in 31·2%, G3 in 9·1%, G4 in 7·8% and G9 in 1·3% of the strains while in 2000–2002 it was 30·8% for G1, 61·5% for G2 and 7·7% for G9 (Table 1).

Table 1. Distribution of G and P genotypes in Pune strains

Unusual P/G combinations are highlighted in bold.

Numbers not in parentheses indicate strains from 1990 to 1994. Numbers within parentheses indicate strains from 2000–2002.

P typing

Thirty-one of the 90 rotavirus strains were typed by multiplex PCR whereas in 59 strains the VP4 gene was amplified by the primers and types were determined on the basis of sequences. P-type distribution showed P[8], P[6], P[4] and P[19] specificities, respectively, in 50%, 6·7%, 42·2% and 1·3% of the strains collected in 1990–1994 whereas in 2000–2002 P[8] was detected in 38·5% along with P[4] in 61·5% of the strains (Table 1).

Combinations of G and P types

The G- and P-typing data obtained on the 77 strains from 1990 to 1994 showed the presence of common rotavirus types in 79·2% of the cases (G1P[8], 29; G2P[4], 23; G3P[8], 4; G4P[8], 5) along with 1·3% G9P[8] (Table 1). G- and P-typing data on 13 strains from 2000–2002 indicated four G1P[8] (30·7%), eight G2P[4] (61·5%) and one G9P[8] (7·6%) (Table 1). The remaining strains (19·5%) showed unusual combinations of G and P types. These strains included, five G1P[6] (5·6%), four G1P[4] (4·4%), one G2P[8] (1·1%), three G3P[4] (3·3%), one G4P[6] (1·1%) and one G1P[19] (1·1%) (Table 1).

Nucleotide sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

Nucleotide sequences of 34 (61·8%) strains genotyped as G1 showed 90–94% identity with reference strain Wa. However, their identities were higher (99·2–100%) compared to the MVD strain isolated in Montevideo, Uruguay as confirmed phylogenetically (Fig. 1). Thirteen strains (23·6%) genotyped as G2 showed 91·9–93·7% identity with reference strain DS-1 and 96·2–99·8% identity with Asian strains (253 from Bangaluru, SC27 from Kolkata, TW93107 from Taiwan and 23G2 from Thailand), as can also be seen in Figure 1. One of the G2 strains (NIV-935070) with P[8] specificity, showed 3·3–5·9% variation from the DS-1 strain and other Pune strains with G2P[4] specificity from the 1990s. It is noteworthy that the specimens from the 1990s and 2000s revealed two major genetic lineages with a 3·5% difference in the nucleotide sequence (Fig. 1). The four G3 and three available G4 sequences showed 95·7–97·8% and 97·9–98·4% nucleotide identity with reference strains YO and Hochi from Japan, respectively. The only detected G9 strain (NIV-006835) appeared to be most closely related to strain GH3574, isolated in Ghana, both genetically (99·9%) and phylogenetically (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree depicting the genetic relatedness of partial VP7 gene sequences of Pune rotavirus strains with other rotavirus strains. The strains are identified by the abbreviation NIV (National Institute of Virology) followed by repository number. Scale indicates genetic distance.

The nucleotide sequences of 33 (55·9%) strains from Pune, typed as P[8], appeared closely related to the RMC100 (India), OP351 (UK) and 3084376 (Australia) strains (98·8–99·8%), whereas the identity with strain KU from Japan, ranged from 92·9 to 94·4%. These relationships were also seen phylogenetically (Fig. 2). The P[8] strain (NIV-935070) with G2 specificity showed 11·7–13·3% variation with these reference strains and other Pune strains with G1P[8] specificity from the 1990s. Four out of 59 strains (6·7%) showed the P[6] specificity with 94·9–96·4% identity with prototype strain ST3 from Mexico and 98·9–99·1% identity with strains 429-np and US1205 from the United States. Twenty-one (35·5%) strains typed as P[4] showed 93·4–95·1% nucleotide identity with RV5 and DS-1 strains of Australia and the United States, respectively, and 97–99·8% identity with Indian strain RMC/G66. Interestingly, one strain with the rare genotype P[19] showed 96·7% identity and close phylogenetic clustering with the Mc323 strain from Thailand (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree depicting the genetic relatedness of partial VP4 gene sequences of Pune rotavirus strains with other rotavirus strains. The strains are identified by the abbreviation NIV (National Institute of Virology) followed by repository number. Scale indicates genetic distance.

Analysis of the sequences of Pune strains that could not be typed by multiplex PCR showed mismatches in the primers specific to G1 (A-G at position 329), G3 (G-T, G-A, T-C, T-C at positions 486, 489, 490, 496, respectively), G9 (A-T, A-G, C-A at positions 759, 765, 773, respectively), P[4] (G-A at two positions, 478 and 489) and P[8] (GATA-ATCG at positions 348–345 and T-G at position 350) (Table 2).

Table 2. Comparative analysis of the nucleotide sequences of Pune strains and the primers used in the study

* For each genotype the original primer sequence is given first followed by sequences of the Pune strains.

The highlighted nucleotides indicate mismatches in the sequences of primers and Pune strains.

Amino-acid substitutions in VP7

The amino-acid alignment of G1 strains revealed two substitutions, Asn94Ser and Asp97Glu in region A, two substitutions Ser147Asn and Val149Glu in region B and one substitution Met217Thr in region C compared to KU strain of serotype 1. G2 strains showed two substitutions Ala87Thr and Asp96Asn in antigenic region A with no change in regions B and C compared to S2 strain of serotype G2. The substitutions in G3 strains were Glu99Lys in region A and Asp222Glu in region C compared to YO strain of serotype 3 while amino-acid sequences of G4 strains showed substitutions Arg143Lys and Lys149Glu in region B only. One strain with G9 specificity showed substitutions Ala87Thr in region A and Thr208Ile and Ala220Thr in region C (Table 3).

Table 3. Amino-acid substitutions in the antigenic regions of VP7 protein of Pune rotavirus strains

* Utilized for mAb generation.

DISCUSSION

In our earlier studies we utilized mAb-based ELISA for the characterization of rotavirus strains [Reference Kelkar and Ayachit11]. In these studies mAbs were found to remain either non-reactive or generate non-specific reactions with specimens containing rotavirus strains. In the present study, we report multiplex PCR and/or nucleotide sequencing based characterization of these strains.

It is worth noting that the substitutions of amino acids were identified in the antigenic regions of the majority of the rotavirus strains isolated in Pune compared to the reference strains G1 (KU), G2 (S2), G3 (Yo), G4 (ST3), and G9 (AU32) that were utilized in mAb generation for serotyping (Table 1). Mutations in antigenic regions A and C have been previously reported in several variants of G1 strains, such as KU, RV4 and K8 that showed different reactivity with mAbs [Reference Taniguchi18Reference Kobayashi, Taniguchi and Urasawa20]. The mutation in antigenic region C was noted to be responsible for a tenfold increase in resistance to neutralization by polyclonal antiviral serum [Reference Dyall-Smith3]. Similarly, the detection of antibody escape mutants and identification of variability associated with genetic drift among strains belonging to G2 genotypes have been described [Reference Iturriza-Gomara21].

Since 1995, circulation of G9 serotype has been reported from many countries in the world [Reference Santos and Hoshino8, Reference Armah22, Reference Kirkwood23]. This serotype has been identified by mAb-based ELISA and was found to be prevalent in Indian children with diarrhoea [Reference Ramachandran24, Reference Awachat and Kelkar25]. The present study indicated its circulation since 1994 in India.

Detection of unusual rotavirus strains G1P[6], G1P[4], G2P[8] and G4P[6] in the present study have been reported previously from India [Reference Ramachandran26, Reference Das27]. Interestingly, the divergence shown by the VP7 and VP4 genes of NIV-935070 strain with G2P[8] specificity is noteworthy compared to the strains with G1P[8] and G2P[4] specificities. The three G3P[4] strains and the single G1P[19] strain are being reported for the first time in India in the present study. The G3P[4] combination has been identified from other geographic regions also [Reference Santos and Hoshino8]. G1 is known to be associated with P[4], P[6], P[8] and P[9] [Reference Santos and Hoshino8, Reference Ramachandran26, Reference Abdel-Haq28, Reference Leite29]. The G1 strain found in association with P[19] in the present study is a rare genotype that was first described in a porcine rotavirus strain 4F by Burke et al. [Reference Bruke, McCrae and Desselberger30]. Further, P[19] strains (Mc323 and Mc345) identified in human rotavirus infections in Thailand were identified as being closely related to porcine P[19] strain [Reference Okado31]. Thus, the strain G1P[19] reported in this study may be a human–porcine reassortant.

The P[6] genotype previously thought to be restricted to asymptomatic infections has also been identified in symptomatic infants recently [Reference Iturriza-Gomara32]. Three P[6] strains of our study clustered with strains causing symptomatic infections while one was closer to a strain associated with an asymptomatic infection (Fig. 2).

It should be noted that the molecular techniques employed in the present study provided typing of rotavirus strains that escaped reactivity or showed multireactivity with mAbs. A high correlation (95%) was found between serotyping ELISA and genotyping techniques for typable specimens. The discordance seen in a small proportion of samples was probably due to non-specific reactions in the ELISA. It is interesting to note that the uncommon combinations of G and P types caused a significant number of infections (Table 1). The segmented nature of the rotavirus genome is known to cause reassortments among the genes. This is facilitated in vivo with multiple infections. However, despite the occurrence of infections with uncommon strains mixed infections were not detected in patients in the present study by multiplex PCR and sequencing.

It should be noted that 61·1% and 65·5% of the strains of the present study remained untypable for VP7 and VP4 genes, respectively, by multiplex PCR. Sequence analysis of the strains showed mismatches in the primers specific to G1, G3, G9, P[4] and P[8] (Table 2). This is in agreement with earlier studies reporting the failure to type rotavirus strains due to mismatches in the primer sets [Reference Rahman33Reference Iturriza-Gomara35].

To summarize, the present study documents predominance of rotavirus G1P[8] and G2P[4] types in the years 1990–1994 and 2000–2002, respectively. It also revealed significant contribution of unusual rotavirus strains in causing diarrhoea. The data are of epidemiological importance and imply that such strains are circulating in western India. Complete molecular characterization of these strains will be useful in the identification of additional components that may be needed in current development of rotavirus vaccines.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to Dr A. C. Mishra, Director, NIV for his support. Financial support provided to J.K.Z. by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India is gratefully acknowledged.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1. Cook, SM, et al. Global seasonality of rotavirus infections. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1990; 68: 171177.Google Scholar
2. Parashar, UD, et al. Rotavirus and severe childhood diarrhea. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2006; 12: 304306.Google Scholar
3. Dyall-Smith, ML, et al. Location of the major antigenic sites involved in serotype specific neutralization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 1986; 83: 34653468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Estes, MK. Rotavirus and their replication. In: Fields, BN, Knipe, DM, Howley, PM, Chanock, RM, Monath, TP, Melnick, JLeds. Fields Virology, 4th edn, New York: Raven Press, 2001, vol. 2. pp. 17471785.Google Scholar
5. Matthijnssens, J, et al. Full genome-based classification of rotaviruses reveals a common origin between human Wa-like and porcine rotavirus strains and human DS-1-like and bovine rotavirus strains. Journal of Virology 2008; 82: 32043219.Google Scholar
6. Gentsch, JR, et al. Review of G and P typing results from a global collection of rotavirus strains: implication for vaccine development. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1996; 174: s3036.Google Scholar
7. Palombo, EA. Genetic and antigenic diversity of human rotaviruses: potential impact on the success of candidate vaccines. FEMS Microbiology Letters 1999; 181: 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Santos, N, Hoshino, Y. Global distribution of rotavirus serotypes/genotypes and its implication for the development and implementation of an effective rotavirus vaccine. Review in Medical Virology 2005; 15: 2956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Gentsch, JR, et al. Serotype diversity and reassortment between human and animal rotavirus strains: implications for rotavirus vaccine programs. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2005; 192 (Suppl. 1): S146159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Kang, G, et al. Epidemiological profile of rotaviral infection in India: challenges for the 21st century. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2005; 192 (Suppl. 1): S120126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Kelkar, SD, Ayachit, VL. Circulation of group A rotavirus subgroups and serotypes in Pune, India, 1990–1997. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 2000; 18: 163170.Google Scholar
12. Gouvea, V, et al. Polymerase chain reaction amplification and typing of rotavirus nucleic acid from stool specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990; 28: 276282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Taniguchi, K, et al. Identification of human and bovine rotavirus serotypes by polymerase chain reaction. Epidemiology and Infection 1992; 109: 303312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Gentsch, JR, et al. Identification of group A rotavirus gene 4 types by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992; 40: 146149.Google Scholar
15. Berois, M, et al. Genetic variation in the VP7 gene of human rotavirus isolated in Montevideo, Uruguay from 1996–99. Journal Medical Virology 2003; 71: 456462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Thompson, JD, et al. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 1997; 25: 48764882.Google Scholar
17. Kumar, S, Tamura, K, Nei, M. MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Briefings in Bioinformatics 2004; 5: 150163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Taniguchi, K, et al. Cross-reactive and serotype-specific neutralization epitopes on VP7 of human rotavirus: nucleotide sequence analysis of antigenic mutants selected with monoclonal antibodies. Journal of Virology 1988; 62: 18701874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Coulson, BS, Kirkwood, C. Relation of VP7 amino acid sequence to monoclonal antibody neutralization of rotavirus and rotavirus monotype. Journal of Virology 1991; 65: 59685974.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Kobayashi, N, Taniguchi, K, Urasawa, S. Analysis of the newly identified neutralization epitopes on VP7 of human rotavirus serotype 1. Journal of General Virology 1991; 72: 117124.Google Scholar
21. Iturriza-Gomara, M, et al. Amino acid substitution within the VP7 protein of G2 rotavirus strains associated with failure to serotype. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2001; 39: 37963798.Google Scholar
22. Armah, GE, et al. Changing patterns of rotavirus genotypes in Ghana: emergence of human rotavirus G9 as a major cause of diarrhoea in children. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 23172322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Kirkwood, C, et al. Genetic and antigenic characterization of rotavirus serotype G9 strains isolated in Australia between 1997 and 2001. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 36493654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Ramachandran, M, et al. Molecular characterization of serotype G9 rotavirus strains from a global collection. Virology 2000; 278: 436444.Google Scholar
25. Awachat, PS, Kelkar, SD. Evidence of rotavirus AU32 like G9 strains from nontypeable faecal specimens of Indian children hospitalized during 1993–1994. Journal of Medical Virology 2004; 74: 656661.Google Scholar
26. Ramachandran, M, et al. Unusual diversity of human rotavirus G and P genotypes in India. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1996; 34: 436439.Google Scholar
27. Das, S, et al. Genetic variability of human rotavirus strains isolated from eastern and northern India. Journal of Medical Virology 2002; 72: 156161.Google Scholar
28. Abdel-Haq, NH, et al. Increased prevalence of G1P[4] genotype among children with rotavirus-associated gastroenteritis in metropolitan Detroit. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 26802682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29. Leite, JP, et al. Rotavirus G and P types circulating in Brazil: characterization by RT-PCR, probe hybridization and sequence analysis. Archives of Virology 1996; 141: 23652374.Google Scholar
30. Bruke, B, McCrae, MA, Desselberger, U. Sequence analysis of two porcine rotaviruses different in growth in vitro and in pathogenicity: distinct VP4 sequences and conservation of NS53, VP6 and VP7 genes. Journal of General Virology 1994; 75: 22052212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Okado, J, et al. New P serotype of group A human rotavirus closely related to that of porcine rotavirus. Journal of Medical Virology 2000; 60: 6369.Google Scholar
32. Iturriza-Gomara, M, et al. Charaterization of G10P[11] rotaviruses causing acute gastroenteritis in neonates and infants in Vellore, India. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2004; 42: 25412547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Rahman, M, et al. Typing of human rotaviruses: nucleotide mismatches between the VP7 gene and primer are associated with genotyping failure. Virology 2005; 2: 2428.Google Scholar
34. Adah, MI, et al. Further characterization of field strains of rotavirus from Nigeria VP4 genotype P6 most frequently identified among symptomatically infected children. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 1997; 43: 267274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35. Iturriza-Gomara, M, et al. Diversity within the VP4 gene of rotavirus P[8] strains: implications for reverse transcription-PCR genotyping. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2000; 38: 898901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Distribution of G and P genotypes in Pune strains

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree depicting the genetic relatedness of partial VP7 gene sequences of Pune rotavirus strains with other rotavirus strains. The strains are identified by the abbreviation NIV (National Institute of Virology) followed by repository number. Scale indicates genetic distance.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree depicting the genetic relatedness of partial VP4 gene sequences of Pune rotavirus strains with other rotavirus strains. The strains are identified by the abbreviation NIV (National Institute of Virology) followed by repository number. Scale indicates genetic distance.

Figure 3

Table 2. Comparative analysis of the nucleotide sequences of Pune strains and the primers used in the study

Figure 4

Table 3. Amino-acid substitutions in the antigenic regions of VP7 protein of Pune rotavirus strains