Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:18:56.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of the antibodies detected by the microscopic agglutination test for bovine leptospirosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. A. Morris
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge, Surrey
S. N. Hussaini
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food Central Veterinary Laboratory, Weybridge, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The nature of the antibodies detectable by the microscopic agglutination test for bovine leptospirosis was examined. Density gradient ultracentrifugation, gel filtration and disulphide-bond-reduction experiments indicated that antileptospiral agglutinating activity was present in both IgM and IgG immunoglobulin fractions. This was confirmed by selective precipitation of specific antibody classes and ion-exchange chromatography.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Avrameas, S. & Ternynck, T. (1969). The cross linking of proteins with glutaraldehyde and its use for the preparation of immunoadsorbents. Immunochemistry 6, 53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corbel, M. J. (1972). Identification of the immunoglobulin class active in the Rose Bengal plate test for bovine brucellosis. Journal of Hygiene 70, 779.Google ScholarPubMed
Cowan, K. M. & Trautman, R. (1965). Antibodies produced by guinea-pigs infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus. Journal of Immunology 94, 858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffus, W. P. H. & Allan, D. (1968). A study on the immunological response in chickens to the somatic antigen of Salmonella gallinarum. Immunology 15, 653.Google Scholar
Hanson, L. E. (1973). Immunologic problems in bovine leptospirosis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 7, 919.Google Scholar
Negi, S. K., Myers, W. L. & Segre, D. (1971a). Antibody response of cattle to Leptospirapomona: a hemagglutination test to measure IgG and IgM antibodies. American Journal of Veterinary Research 32, 1907.Google ScholarPubMed
Negi, S. K., Myers, W. L. & Segre, D. (1971b). Antibody response of cattle to Leptospirapomona: response as measured by hemagglutination, microscopic agglutination, and hamster protection tests. American Journal of Veterinary Research 32, 1915.Google ScholarPubMed
Sascki, M. & Arima, S. (1971). A specific milk antibody derived from a cow immunized with L. icterohaemorrhagiae. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 41, 180.Google Scholar
Shreeve, B. J. & Sojka, W. J. (1971). Immunoelectrophoresis studies on extracts principally derived from porcine strains of Escherichia coli. Research in Veterinary Science 13, 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, J. W. (1954). The Laboratory Diagnosis of Leptospirosis. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1967). Current problems in leptospirosis research. Report of the W.H.O. Expert Group. World Health Organization Technical Report Series 380.Google Scholar