Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:10:38.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Canine Piroplasmosis. I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

George H. F Nuttali
Affiliation:
University Lecturer in Bacteriology and Preventive Medicine, Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The disease which is the subject of this paper is one of a group of diseases affecting different animals, and caused by parasites possessing very similar characters. The diseases produced by parasites of the genus Piroplasma appear to closely resemble each other, and for this reason it is well to follow the terminology adopted by French investigators in speaking of any one of the diseases in question as a Piroplasmosis. Not only are the parasites similar in these diseases, but they also appear, in all cases where the subject has been worked out, to be transmitted by species of Ixodoidea or Ticks.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1904

References

Kossel, H., Schütz, Weber, Miessner (1903), Ueder die Hämoglobinurie der Rinder in Deutschland. Arbeiten a. d. Kaiserl. Gesundheitsamte, Bd. XX. Heft 1, 77 pp., 3 plates of photomicrographs illustrating the structure of Ixodes reduvius.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. (1903), Die Zeckenkrankheit der Rinder—Haemoglobinaemia ixodio-plasmatica boum—in Deutsch-, English-Ostafrika, and Uganda. Arch. f. wiss. u. prakt. Tierheilk., Bd. XXX. pp. 42101.Google Scholar
Babès, (1892), L'étiologie d'une epizootie des moutons denommée “Carceag” en Roumanie. Comptes rendus de L'acad. d. Sc., T. cxv. p. 359.Google Scholar
Bonome, A. (1895), Ueber parasitäre Ictero-Hämaturie der Schafe. Beitrag zum Studium der Amoebo-Sporidien. Virchow's Archiv, Bd. 139, pp. 115. 1 Tafel, colorirt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheon, and Robertson, (1902), The Veterinary Record, p. 629.Google Scholar
Laveran, and Nicolle, (1899), Hématozoaires endoglobulaires du mouton. Soc. de biol., S. XI. 1, pp. 800802.Google Scholar
Leblanc, and Savigné, (1899), Journ. de méd. vétér., p. 703.Google Scholar
Motas, (27. XII. 1902), La piroplasmose ovine, “Carceag”. Comptes rendus soc. de biol., S. XIII. 4, pp. 15221524.Google Scholar
Motas, (25. IV. 1903), Sur le rôle des tiques dans le dévelopment de la piro-plasmose ovine (Carceag). 2. note. Comptes rend. soc. de biol., T. LV. pp. 501504.Google Scholar
Ziemann, (1902), Deutsche med. Wochenschr., pp. 366, 385 (see Postscript).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordet, and Danysz, (1898), cited by Martini. Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Tropenhygiene, Bd. 7, p. 504 (gives no reference).Google Scholar
Guglielmi, G. (1899), Un cas de paludisme chez le cheval. La clinica veterinaria (cited by Laveran, 1901).Google Scholar
Laveran, A. (1901), Contribution à l'étude de Piroplasma equi. Soc. de biol., S. XII. 3, pp. 385388.Google Scholar
Theiler, A. (1901), Die Pferdemalaria. Schweizer Archiv f. Tierheilk., Bd. 43, pp. 253—280 (2 plates), also Die Malaria des Pferdes, Dissertation Bern, 22 pp. (4 plates), Zürich (the same as preceding but with addition of temperature charts), also “Equine Malaria,” Journ. of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics (March 1902), vol. XV. pp. 40—54. (English translation of foregoing.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziemann, H. (1902), see above.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. F. (1903), Spotted fever (Tick fever) of the Rocky Mountains. A new disease. Treasury Dept., Public Health and Marine Hosp. Service of the U. S., Hygienic Laboratory Bulletin, No. 14, 50 pp. (3 col. plates, 2 photos, charts and maps).Google Scholar
Wilson, L. B., and Chowning, W. M. (1902), Report on the investigation of so-called “Spotted fever”. 1st Biennial Report of the Montana State Board of Health from its creation, 15 March 1901 to 30 Nov. 1902, 25 pp. (see Postscript).Google Scholar
Almy, (10. X. 1901), Nouveaux cas de piroplasmose canine. Bulletin de la Soc. centr. de méd. vétér., pp. 375380.Google Scholar
Bowhill, T., and Doux, C. A. Le. (IV. 1904), A contribution to the study of Piroplasmosis canis—Malignant Jaundice of the Dog (Hutcheon). Journal of Hygiene, vol. IV. pp. 217218. (1 Plate).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright-Reed, J. (30. XI. 1893), Letter headed “Disease amongst dogs”. Agricult. Journ. published by the Dept. of Agriculture of the Cape Colony, vol. VI. p. 476.Google Scholar
Celli, A. (1900), Malaria according to the new researches (Longmans, Green and Co., London), p. 38.Google Scholar
Galli-Valerio, B. (30. I. 1904), Die Piroplasmose des Hundes. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., I Abth., Bd. 34, pp. 367371, 1 fig., 1 chart.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, D. (30. XI. 1893), Malignant jaundice or bilious fever of the dog. Agricult. Journ. published by the Dept. of Agriculture of the Cape Colony, vol. VI. pp. 476477.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, D. (12. X. 1899), Malignant malarial fever of the dog. Agricult. Journ. Cape of Good Hope. Cape Town, vol. XV. pp. 558560. Also in Veterinary Journal (XII. 1899), vol. XLIX. pp. 398401. Also in Cape of Good Hope Dept. of Agriculture. Report of the Colonial Veterinary Surgeon and Assistant Veterinary Surgeons, for the year 1899. Cape Town (1900), pp. 79.Google Scholar
Leblanc, P. (20. I. 1900), Parasites endoglobulaires du chien, nature de l'ictère infectieux du chien. C. R. Soc. de biologie, pp. 7071.Google Scholar
Leblanc, P. (17. II. 1900), Piroplasma canis. Ictère infectieux du chien. C. R. Soc. de biol., pp. 168169.Google Scholar
Leblanc, (10. X. 01), Discussion following communication by Almy, q.v.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, C. P. (21 Nov. 1901), Transmission of malignant jaundice of the Dog by a species of tick. Cape of Good Hope Dept. of Agriculture. Repr. from Agricult. Journ., 12 pp.Google Scholar
Koch, R. (1898), Reiseberichte über Rinderpest, Bubonenpest in Indian und Afrika, Tsetse- oder Surrakrankheit, Texasfieber, tropische Malaria, Schwarzwasserfieber, Berlin (J. Springer) [see especially foot of p. 107].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchoux, E. (27. I. 1900), Piroplasma canis (Lav.) chez les chiens du Senegal. Comptes Rendus de la soc. de biol., pp. 9798.Google Scholar
Nocard, E. (10. X. 1901), Discussion following communication by Almy, q.v.Google Scholar
Nocard, E. (1902), Sur la fréquence en France et sur le diagnostic de la piroplasmose canine. Bull. de la Soc. centr. de méd. vétér., p. 716 (rev. by Ch. Porcher in Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., 1903, Bd. XXXIII. p. 412).Google Scholar
Nocard, and Almy, (28. III. 1901), Une observation de piroplasmose canine. Recueil de méd. vétér., 8 sér., T. VIII. 1901, including (Annexe) Bull. de la Soc. centr. de méd. vétér., n.s., T. XIX. pp. 192195.Google Scholar
Nocard, and Motas, (IV. 1902), Contribution à l'étude de la piroplasmose canine. Annales de l' Institut Pasteur, T. XVI. pp. 257290.(Plates); also Bulletin de la Soc. centr. de méd. vétér., 8 sér., IX. pp. 253283. 2 figs. Séance du 1 Mai, 1902.Google Scholar
Piana, G. P. (1896), Esame microscopico del sangue. Moderno Zooiatro, pp. 2536 (Plate showing coloured figures of parasites).Google Scholar
Piana, G. P., and Galli-Valerio, B.. (10. V. 1895), Su di un infezione del cane con parassiti endoglobulari nel sangue. Moderno Zooiatro, No. 9, p. 163 (Reprint 7 pp.), also Autoreferat in Centralbl. f. Bakteriol., 1895, vol. XVIII. p. 345, see also Ibid. 1904, vol. XXXIV. pp. 367369.Google Scholar
Robertson, W. (XII. 1901), Malignant Jaundice in the Dog. Journ. of Comparative Pathology and Therapeutics, vol. XIV. pp. 327336. 5 figs. (Reprinted 5. VII. 1902.) The Agricult. Journ., Dept. of Agriculture, Cape of Good Hope. Cape Town, vol. XX. pp. 675682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, W. (5. VI. 1902), Further notes on Malignant Jaundice in the Dog. Agricultural Journ., Dept. of Agriculture of the Cape Colony. Cape Town, vol. XX. pp. 682685.Google Scholar
Spreull, J. (1900), Malarial Jaundice in Dogs. Cape of Good Hope, Dept. of Agriculture. Report of the Colonial Veterinary Surgeon and the Assistant Veterinary Surgeons for the year 1899. Cape Town, 1900, p. 45.Google Scholar
Neumann, G. (1897), Révision de la famille des Ixodidés. Mém. de la Soc. Zool. de France, Vol. X. pp. 347350. (3 figures of H. leachi.)Google Scholar
Railliet, A. (1895), Traité de zoologie médicale et agricole. Paris, p. 703, et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, D. E., and Stiles, C. W. (1901), The cattle ticks (Ixodoidea) of the United States. U. S. Dept. of Agricult., 17th Annual Report of the Bureau of Animal Industry for 1900, pp. 380491. (A wealth of illustration, bibliography, etc.)Google Scholar