Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:49:31.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brucella abortus in Milk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. Smith
J. Smith
Affiliation:
(From the City Hospital Laboratory, Aberdeen.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As a result of the extensive investigations in America and on the Continent into the relationship of Br. abortus to undulant fever in man, attention in this country has been directed to cases of fever due to obscure causes, with the result that an increasing number of cases of undulant fever are being reported. So far, however, the cases in Great Britain appear to be less numerous than those in the United States and in Denmark where every effort has been directed to tracing sources of infection and where the conclusion has been reached that, although a certain number are infected by contact with the secretions and carcasses of infected animals, many infections occur through ingesting milk containing Br. abortus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , July 1932 , pp. 354 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

References

Andersen, C. W. and Thomsen, A. (1930). Acta path. et microbiol. Scandinav. Suppl. v, p. 53.Google Scholar
Arnold, L. (1930). Amer. J. Pub. Health, 20, 160.Google Scholar
Boak, R. A. and Carpenter, C. M. (1931). J. Inf. Dis. 49, 485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, C. M. and Boak, R. A. (1928). J. Inf. Dis. 43, 327.Google Scholar
Dalrymple-Champneys, W. (1929). Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects, No. 56, p. 30.Google Scholar
Dalton, F. J. A. and Eyre, J. W. H. (1904). J. Hyg. 4, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabyan, M. (1912). J. Med. Res. 26, 441.Google Scholar
Fabyan, M (1913). J. Med. Res. 28, 85.Google Scholar
Hagan, W. A. (1922). J. Exp. Med. 36, 697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, A. V., Jordan, C. F., Borts, C. F. and Hardy, G. C. (1931). National Institute of Health U.S.P.H.S. Bulletin 158, p. 66.Google Scholar
Hasley, D. E. (1930). J. Inf. Dis. 46, 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, W. F. (1928). J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 91, 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, J. and Whitby, L. E. H. (1931). Lancet, ii, 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, K. F. (1931). Amer. J. Pub. Health, 21, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, W. H. (1928). Amer. J. Pub. Health, 18, 710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priesz, H. (1903). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. I, Orig. 33, 190.Google Scholar
Smillie, E. W. (1918). J. Exp. Med. 28, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. (1932). Quarterly J. Med. (In press.)Google Scholar
Smith, Th. and Fabyan, M. (1912). Zbl. Bakt. Abt. I, Orig. 61, 549.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. S. and McNutt, M. M. (1926). J. Path. and Bact. 29, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, H. (1928). Ztschr. f. Fleisch- u. Milchhyg. 38, 1.Google Scholar