Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T20:35:56.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biochemical investigation of Providence strains and their relationship to the Proteus group*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Jaques Singer
Affiliation:
The Bacteriological and Pediatric Departments of the Government Hospital, Haifa, Israel
Joseph Bar-Chay
Affiliation:
The Bacteriological and Pediatric Departments of the Government Hospital, Haifa, Israel
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Seventy-four urease negative and twelve urease weakly positive strains were studied which, according to their biochemical properties, had to be considered as belonging to the Providence group. Thirty Proteus rettgeri and five anaerogenic Proteus species were examined concomitantly.

2. 668 strains of Enterobacteriaceae were tested for the P.P.A. reaction, of which only the 192 Proteus and the 86 Providence strains rapidly transformed phenylalanine into phenylpyruvic acid.

3. P.P.A. test, IMViC reactions, fermentation properties, smell, swarming are similar to those of the Proteus group, particularly P. rettgeri; it is therefore suggested that the Providence strains should be incorporated in the Proteus group.

4. For all purposes the P.P.A. reaction appears to be better suited than the urea test for differentiating strains of Enterobacteriaceae from the Proteus-Providence group.

The authors are grateful to Dr C. A. Stuart, Brown University, Providence, and Dr M. Greenstein, Sewage Disposal Works, Providence; to Dr W. H. Ewing, Communicable Disease Center, Chamblee, Georgia; to Prof. L. Olitzki, Hebrew University, Jerusalem; to Dr R. Mushin, University of Melbourne, Australia. We are especially indebted to Miss E. Salomon and Miss A. Engel for their valuable technical assistance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1954

References

REFERENCES

Bergey, D. H. (1945). Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins Co.Google Scholar
Brooke, M. S. (1951). Biochemical investigation on certain urinary strains of Enterobacteriaceae. (1) B. cloacae, (2) ‘Providence’. Acta path. microbiol. scand. 29, 1.Google Scholar
Buttiaux, R., Tacquet, A. & Kesteloot, A. (1949). Sur l'action pathogène pour l'homme de bacilles para-coli. Ann. Inst. Pasteur, Lille, 1, 1016.Google Scholar
Christensen, W. B. (1946). Urea decomposition as means of differentiating Proteus and paracolon cultures from each other and from Salmonella and Shigella types. J. Bact. 52, 461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, P. R. & Ewing, W. H. (1952). The status of serologic typing in the family Enterobacteriaceae. Amer. J. publ. Hlth, 42, 665.Google Scholar
Ewing, W. H. & Graratti, J. L. (1947). Shigella types in Mediterranean area. J. Bact. 53, 191.Google Scholar
Galton, M. M., Hess, M. E. & Collins, P. (1947). The isolation and distribution in Florida of an anaerogenic paracolon type 29911. J. Bact. 53, 649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henriksen, S. D. (1950). A comparison of the phenylpyruvic acid reaction and the urease test in the differentiating of Proteus from enteric organism. J. Bact. 60, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffmann, F. (1951). Enterobacteriaceae. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Perch, B. (1950). Om Proteusgruppens serologi. Nyt Nordisk Forlag. Copenhagen: Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
Plass, H. F. R. (1947). Outbreak of diarrheal disease associated with paracolon. J. Lab. clin. Med. 32, 886.Google Scholar
Rustigian, R. & Stuart, C. A. (1945). Biochemical and serological relationships of genus Proteus. J. Bact. 49, 419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sachs, A. (1943). A report of an investigation into the characteristics of new types of non-mannitol fermenting bacilli isolated from cases of bacillary dysentery in India and Egypt. J. R. Army med. Cps, 80, 92.Google Scholar
Singer, J. (1950). Cultures of Enterobacteriaceae. III. Detection of urease and indol in a single medium. Amer. J. clin. Path. 20, 880.Google Scholar
Stuart, C. A., Wheeler, K. M. & McGann, V. (1946). Further studies on one anaerogenic paracolon organism type 29911. J. Bact. 52, 431.Google Scholar
Stuart, C. A., Wheeler, K. M., Rustigian, R. & Zimmerman, A. (1943). Biochemical and antigenic relationships of the paracolon bacteria. J. Bact. 45, 101.Google Scholar