Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:36:16.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The bacteriophages of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Filtration measurements and electron microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. van Den Ende
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, and the National Institute for Medical Research, Hampstead, London, N. W. 3
Phyllis A. Don
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, and the National Institute for Medical Research, Hampstead, London, N. W. 3
W. J. Elford
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, and the National Institute for Medical Research, Hampstead, London, N. W. 3
C. E. Challice
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, and the National Institute for Medical Research, Hampstead, London, N. W. 3
I. M. Dawson
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, and the National Institute for Medical Research, Hampstead, London, N. W. 3
J. E. Hotchin
Affiliation:
From the Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, and the National Institute for Medical Research, Hampstead, London, N. W. 3
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Preliminary observations in a systematic study of fifteen bacteriophages isolated from Pseudomonas aeruginosa are described. The evidence as to size, morphology and plaque appearance indicates that this group of phages comprises several distinct types. The electron microscope reveals some of the phages to be simple spheres, but the majority are tailed particles.

The importance of this group in the study of the phenomenon of lysogenicity is pointed out.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

References

REFERENCES

Chapman, G., Hillier, J. & Johnson, F. H. (1951). J. Bact. 61, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, M. (1946). Biol. Rev. 21, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, M. & Luria, S. E. (1942). Arch. Biochem. 1, 111.Google Scholar
Don, P. A. & Van Den Ende, M. (1950). J. Hyg., Camb. 48, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elford, W. J. (1933). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 112, 384.Google Scholar
Herčik, F. (1950). Experientia, 6, 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lwoff, A., Siminovitch, L. & Kveldgaard, N. (1950). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 79, 815.Google Scholar
Miles, A. A. & Misra, S. S. (1938). J. Hyg., Camb., 38, 732.Google Scholar
Smiles, J., Welch, F. V. & Elford, W. J. (1948). J. gen. Microbiol. 2, 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyckoff, R. W. G. (1950). Experientia, 6, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar