Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T14:54:35.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The bacteriology of tropical pyomyositis in Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

W. D. Foster
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, Makerere University College
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The bacteriology of the pus from 79 cases of tropical pyomyositis has been studied. In 74 cases Staphylococcus aureus was isolated in pure culture.

2. Phage typing showed that 60% of the pyomyositis strains belonged to phage Group II as compared with 22% for miscellaneous hospital infections and 21% for nasal carrier strains.

3. A high proportion of the Group II strains from pyomyositis were found to be penicillin resistant and it is thought that this is unlikely to be due to the use of penicillin therapeutically but is probably a natural characteristic of the strains.

4. Other suggested aetiological factors in pyomyositis such as leptospirosis and syphilis have been investigated but no association has been found.

5. The phage types of staphylococci found in Uganda have been compared with those reported from England and Australia and found not to be strikingly different.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

References

Abram, J. H. (1904). Inflammation of the muscles, with special reference to two cases of infective myositis. Lancet, ii, 1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R. D., Denny-Brown, D. & Pearson, C. H. (1962). Diseases of Muscle, p. 386, 2nd ed.London: H. Kimpton.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. S. & Williams, R. E. O. (1956). Bacteriophage typing of enteric pathogens and staphylococci and its use in epidemiology. J. clin. Path. 9, 94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashken, M. H. & Cotton, R. E. (1963). Tropical skeletal muscle abscesses (Pyomyositis Tropicans). Br. J. Surg. 50, 846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, A. M. & Gresham, G. A. (1958). Acute streptococcal myositis. Lancet, i, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouffard, G. (1920). De la pyomysite, maladie humaine à Pasteurella. Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 13, 398.Google Scholar
Burkitt, R. T. (1947). Tropical Pyomyositis. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 50, 71.Google ScholarPubMed
Clark, F. W. (1887). A case of acute suppurative myositis. Br. med. J. ii, 69.Google Scholar
Cook, J. (1963). Pyomyositis. E. Afr. med. J. 40, 574.Google ScholarPubMed
Fleming, A. McK. (1930). Tropical myositis. Trans. R. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 24, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, G. (1924). Beitrage zur Kenntnis der ‘Myositis infectiosa’. Acta. chir. scand. 51, 415.Google Scholar
Lack, C. H. & Towers, A. G. (1962). Serological tests for staphylococcal infections. Br. med. J. ii. 1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manson-Bahr, P. (1960). Manson's Textbook of Tropical Medicine, p. 679, 15th ed.London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Meyer-May, J. & Vaucel, M.(1936). La spirochétose ictéro-hémorragique. Est-elle responsible de certaines myosites tropicales? Bull. Soc. Path. exot. 29, 257.Google Scholar
Parker, M. T. (1958). Some cultural characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus strains from superficial skin infections. J. Hyg., Camb., 56, 238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robin, G. C. (1961). Tropical myositis in Malaya. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 64, 288.Google ScholarPubMed
Rountree, P. (1953). Bacteriophage typing of strains of staphylococci isolated in Australia. Lancet, i, 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, J. A. (1949). The Natural History of Disease, pp. 225, 2nd ed.Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traquair, R. N. (1947). Pyomyositis. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 50, 81.Google ScholarPubMed
Williams, R. E. O. & Jevons, M. P. (1961). Lysotypen von Staphylococcus aureus ver-schiedener Herkunft. Zentbl. Bakt. ParasitKde, Abt. 1, orig. 181, 349.Google Scholar
Williams, R. E. O., Rippon, J. E. & Dowsett, L. M. (1953). Bacteriophage typing of strains of Staphylococcus aureus from various sources. Lancet, i, 510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar