Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T12:41:42.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The bacteriological interpretation of vaginal smears

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Nancy Laughton
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The genus Corynebacterium is common in the vagina. In direct smears forms with exaggerated curvature and staining Gram-negatively may easily be mistaken for vibrios.

2. Attention is drawn to the not infrequent presence of Gram-negative cocci in direct vaginal smears. From these cases Diplococcus crassus, a commensal member of the genus Neisseria, has been isolated. These cocci could be mistaken for gonococci.

3. An unusual organism seen in two direct smears from the vagina is described, and the suggestion is made that it may be Streptobacillus moniliformis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , September 1948 , pp. 262 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1948

References

REFERENCES

Brown, T. McP. & Hayes, G. S. (1942). Proceedings of the Society of American Bacteriologists. J. Bact. 43, 82.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, B. & Baird, D. (1930). Trans. Med. Chir. Soc. Edinb. Session 109, 1929–30. In Edinb. Med. J. N.S. 37, 135.Google Scholar
Cruickshank, R. & Sharman, A. (1934). J. Obstet. Gynaec. 41, 190, 208.Google Scholar
Dienes, L. (1939). J. Infect. Dis. 65, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dienes, L. & Smith, W. E. (1942). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 50, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klieneberger-Nobel, E. (1945). Lancet, 2, 46.Google Scholar
Pijper, A. (1946). J. Path. Bact. 58, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaman, M. H. and Collaborators (1946). J. Path. Bact. 58, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar