Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:46:26.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bacteriological findings in an epidemic of Sonne dysentery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. Beck
Affiliation:
From the Central Pathological Laboratory of the London Country Hospitals for Nervous and Mental Disorders and Devonport Laboratories, Seamen's Hospital, Greenwich
D. F. Buckle
Affiliation:
From the Central Pathological Laboratory of the London Country Hospitals for Nervous and Mental Disorders and Devonport Laboratories, Seamen's Hospital, Greenwich
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During an epidemic of Sonne dysentery in Tooting Bec Hospital of which the epidemiological aspects have been described by one of us (Buckle, 1938), and during a recurrence of this epidemic, a number of strains were isolated of the causal organism (140) and various bacilli which were somewhat similar in their cultural and biochemical behaviour. It was thought that a close bacteriological and serological examination of these might be useful in giving information about the constancy of behaviour of the Sonne group, the question of possible biochemical subgroups of Sonne bacilli (Bojlén. 1934), and the relationship of the dysenteroid organisms isolated to the true dysentery bacilli, their classification, and significance.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1939

References

REFERENCES

Andrewes, F. W. (1918). Lancet, 1, 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamforth, J. (1934). J. Hyg., Camb., 34, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blacklock, J. W. S. & Guthrie, K. J. (1937). J. Path. Bact. 45, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, E. (1938). Brit. med. J. 1, 836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bojlén, K. (1934). Dysentery in Denmark. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Braun, H. & Weil, A. J. (1928). Zbl. Bakt. 1 Orig. 109, 16.Google Scholar
Buckle, D. (1938). Lancet, 2, 913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H. S. (1937). J. Path. Bact. 45, 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channon, H. A. (1926). J. Path. Bact. 29, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, W. L. (1933). J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 36, 65.Google Scholar
Fraser, A. M., Kinloch, J. P. & Smith, J. (1926). J. Hyg., Camb., 25, 453.Google Scholar
Fyfe, G. M. (1927). J. Hyg., Camb., 26, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, H. (1930). J. Hyg., Camb., 30, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hübschmann, P. (1925). Virchows Arch. 254, 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, A. D. (1929). System of Bacteriology, Med. Res. Council, 4, 220.Google Scholar
Kerrin, J. C. (1928). J. Hyg., Camb., 28, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, V. (1926). Acta path. microbiol. scand. 3, 696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, H. (1921). J. Hyg., Camb., 20, 330.Google Scholar
Seligmann, E. (1917). Zbl. Bakt. 1 Orig. 79, 71.Google Scholar
Thornton, L. H. D. & Darmady, E. M. (1938). Lancet, 1, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, W. R. (1927). J. Hyg., Camb., 26, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar