Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:44:36.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attenuation of virulence in Vibrio cholerae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

K. Bhaskaran  and
V. B. Sinha
K. Bhaskaran
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
V. B. Sinha
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper describes the study of a mutant of Vibrio cholerae which is shown to be attenuated by its avirulence to mouse, rabbit and chick embryo. This mutant character is stable, and the avirulence of this strain probably results from its inability to multiply actively in the tissues of the infected animals. The need for the study of such attenuated strains as live vaccines in man is discussed, and certain aspects of immunity to cholera are reviewed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 65 , Issue 2 , June 1967 , pp. 135 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

References

Barua, D. & Mukherjee, A. C. (1963). Direct bacterial haemagglutination test for differentiating El Tor vibrios from V. cholerae. Bull. Calcutta Sch. trop. Med. Hyg. 11, 85.Google Scholar
Besredka, A. (1927). Local Immunization, Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co.Google Scholar
Bhaskaran, K. (1960). Recombination of characters between mutant stocks of Vibrio cholerae, strain 162. J. gen. Microbiol. 23, 47.Google Scholar
Bhaskaran, K. (1964). Segregation of genetic factors during recombination in Vibrio cholerae, strain 162. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 30, 845.Google Scholar
Bhaskaran, K. & Sinha, V. B. (1966). Attenuation of virulence in Vibrio cholerae. WHO/Cholera Information 66.6, p. 13.Google Scholar
Bhaskaran, K., Sinha, V. B. & Iyer, S. S. (1966). Study of mutations in Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio el Tor. WHO/Cholera Information/66.6, p. 5.Google Scholar
Burrows, W. (1965). Cholera vibrio toxicities. Proceedings of the Cholera Research Symposium, p. 120. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Burrows, W., Elliott, M. E. & Havens, I. (1947). Studies on immunity to Asiatic Cholera. IV. The excretion of coproantibody in experimental enteric Cholera in the guinea-pig. J. infect. Dis. 81, 261.Google Scholar
Cvjetanovic, B. (1965). Earlier field studies of the effectiveness of Cholera vaccines. Proceedings of the Cholera Research Symposium, p. 355. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Cvjetanovic, B. (1966). WHO activities in the field of cholera. In Training Course on Cholera WHO/Cholera/66·5, Calcutta, 7–31 March 1966. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
De, S. N. & Chatterji, D. N. (1953). An experimental study of the mechanism of action of Vibrio cholerae on the intestinal mucous membrane. J. Path. Bact. 66, 559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De, S. N., Ghose, M. L. & Chandra, J. (1962). Further observation on Cholera enterotoxin. Trans. T. Soc. trop. Med. Hyg. 56, 241.Google Scholar
Dutta, N. K. & Habbu, M. K. (1955). Experimental Cholera in infant rabbits: a method for chemotherapeutic investigation. Br. J. Pharmac. Chemother. 10, 153.Google Scholar
Feeley, J. C. (1965). Passive protective activity of antisera in infant rabbits infected orally with Vibrio cholerae. Proceedings of the Cholera Research Symposium, p. 231. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, R. A. (1964). Virulence of El Tor vibrios for chick embryos. Nature, Lond. 202, 609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finkelstein, R. A. (1965 a). Immunological aspects of experimental Cholera. Proceedings of the Cholera Research Symposium, p. 58. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, R. A. (1965 b). Observations on the nature and mode of action of the choleragenic products of cholera vibrios. Proceedings of the Cholera Research Symposium, p. 264. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, R. A., Atthasampunna, P., Chulasamaya, M. & Charunmethee, P. (1966). Pathogenesis of experimental cholera: biologic activities of purified procholeragen A. J. Immun. 96, 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, R. A., Norris, T. H. & Dutta, N. K. (1964). Pathogenesis of experimental cholera in infant rabbits. I. Observations on the intra-intestinal infection and experimental cholera produced with cell-free products. J. infect Dis. 114, 203.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, R. A., Powell, C. J., Woodrow, J. C. & Krevans, J. R. (1965). Serological responses in man to a single small dose of cholera vaccine with special reference to the lack of influence of ABO blood groups on natural antibody or immunological responsiveness. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 116, 152.Google ScholarPubMed
Finkelstein, R. A. & Ramm, G. M. (1962). Effect of age on susceptibility to experimental cholera in embryonated eggs. J. infect. Dis. 111, 239.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, R. A., Sobocinski, P. Z., Atthasampunna, P. & Charunmethee, P. (1966). Pathogenesis of experimental cholera: identification of choleragen (procholeragen A) by disc immunoelectrophoresis and its differentiation from cholera mucinase. J. immun. 97, 25.Google Scholar
Freter, R. (1956). Coproantibody and bacterial antagonism as protective factors in experimental cholera. J. exp. Med. 104, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freter, R. (1962). Detection of coproantibody and its formation after parenteral and oral immunization of human volunteers. J. infect. Dis. 111, 37.Google Scholar
Freter, R. (1965). Coproantibody and oral vaccines. Proceedings of the Cholera Research Symposium, p. 222. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Freter, R. & Gangarosa, E. J. (1963). Oral immunization and production of coproantibody in human volunteers. J. Immun. 91, 724.Google Scholar
Gardner, A. D., & Venkatraman, K. V. (1935). The antigens of the cholera group of vibrios. J. Hyg. Camb. 35, 262.Google Scholar
Gardner, E. W., Lyles, S. T., Lankford, C. E. & Hagens, S. J. (1963). A comparison of the virulence of Vibrio cholerae strains for the embryonated egg. J. infect. Dis. 112, 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffitts, J. J. (1942). The use of mucin in experimental infections of mice with Vibrio cholerae. Publ. Hlth Rep., Wash. 57, 707.Google Scholar
Heiberg, B. (1935). On the classification of Vibrio cholerae and Cholera-like vibrios. Copenhagen: Arnold Busck.Google Scholar
Mukerjee, S. (1961). Diagnostic uses of cholera bacteriophages. J. Hyg., Camb. 59, 109.Google Scholar
Mukerjee, S. (1963). Preliminary studies on the development of a live oral vaccine for anti-cholera immunization. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 29, 753.Google ScholarPubMed
Oza, N. B. & Dutta, N. K. (1963). Experimental cholera produced by toxin prepared by ultrasonic disintegration of V. comma. J. Bact. 85, 497.Google Scholar
Panse, M. V., & Dutta, N. K. (1964). Cholera vaccines and placental transmission of antibodies. J. Immun. 93, 243.Google Scholar
Panse, M. V., Jhala, H. I. & Dutta, N. K. (1964). Passive immunity in experimental cholera. J. infect. Dis. 114, 26.Google Scholar
Pesigan, T. P. (1965). Cholera and El Tor vaccines used in the controlled field trials in the Philippines by the joint Philippine-Japan-WHO Cholera Committee. Proceedings of the Cholera Research Symposium, p. 171. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Pittman, M. & Feeley, J. C. (1965). Laboratory assay of Cholera vaccine potency. Proceedings of the Cholera Research Symposium, p. 163. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Reed, L. J. & Muench, H. (1938). A simple method for estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg. 27, 493.Google Scholar
Shrivastava, D. L. & White, P. B. (1947). Note of the relationship of the so-called Ogawa and Inaba types of Vibrio cholerae. Indian J. med. Res. 36, 409.Google Scholar