Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:31:59.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay to the detection and identification of foot-and-mouth disease viruses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. R. Crowther  and
E. M. E. Abu Elzein
J. R. Crowther
Affiliation:
The Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, Surrey
E. M. E. Abu Elzein
Affiliation:
The Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was applied to the detection and identification of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) virus types. The test proved successful for the specific detection of virus from infected tissue culture, and from epithelial tissues from bovines suspected of having FMD. The ELISA compared favourably with the complement fixation (CF) test, being more sensitive and unaffected by anticomplementary factors.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , December 1979 , pp. 513 - 519
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

References

Abu Elzein, E. M. E. & Crowther, J. R. (1978). Enzyme-labelled immunosorbent assay techniques in foot-and-mouth disease virus research. Journal of Hygiene 80, 391–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abu Elzein, E. M. E. & Crowther, J. R. (1979). The specific detection of whole 140S foot-and-mouth disease virus particles by the enzyme-labelled immunosorbent assay. Journal of Hygiene 83, 127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avrameas, S. (1969). Coupling of enzymes to proteins with glutaraldehyde. Immunochemistry 6, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooksby, J. B. (1952). The technique of complement-fixation in foot-and-mouth disease research. Agricultural Research Council Report Series No. 12. London, H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Brown, F. & Cartwright, B. (1963). Purification of radioactive foot-and-mouth disease virus. Nature, London 199, 1168–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckley, L. S., Osborne, R. W. & Pereira, H. G. (1975). Laboratory diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease and swine vesicular diseases. Bulletin of International Epizootiology 83, 123–9.Google Scholar
Crowther, J. R. & Abu Elzein, E. M. E. (1979). Detection and quantification of foot-and-mouth disease virus by enzyme-labelled immunosorbent assay. Journal of General Virology 42, 597–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garland, A. J. M. (1974). Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Voller, A., Bidwell, D. & Bartlett, A. (1976). Microplate enzyme immunoassays for the immuno-diagnosis of virus infections. Manual of Clinical Immunology, 69, pp. 506–12. American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C., USA.Google Scholar