Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:13:34.829Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Application of pulsed field gel electrophoresis to the 1993 epidemic of whooping cough in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

S. N. Syedabubakar ,
R. C. Matthews ,
N. W. Preston ,
D. Owen  and
V. Hillier
S. N. Syedabubakar
Affiliation:
Pertussis Reference Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Clinical Sciences Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL
R. C. Matthews*
Affiliation:
Pertussis Reference Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Clinical Sciences Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL
N. W. Preston
Affiliation:
Pertussis Reference Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Clinical Sciences Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL
D. Owen
Affiliation:
Pertussis Reference Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Clinical Sciences Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL
V. Hillier
Affiliation:
Computational Group, University of Manchester
*
* Author for correspondence.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this study was to DNA fingerprint the majority (64 %) of isolates received at the Pertussis Reference Laboratory during the 1993 whooping cough epidemic by pulsed field gel electrophoresis of Xba I - generated restriction digests. Two DNA restriction patterns, types 1 and 3, predominated (40% and 23%. respectively, of 180 isolates) but type 2, identified in a previous study was notably absent. Twenty-one new DNA types occurred (24% of isolates), some being atypical as bands 155–230 kb were no longer conserved, but there was no statistically significant difference in their incidence in the upswing (June-September) compared to the downswing (October-December) phase of the epidemic. There was a relatively high proportion of new types, compared to type 1. at the peak (September). About 50% of isolates received were from the North Western Region, where 44% of isolates were DNA type 1. Whereas only 1 out of 10 isolates from Scotland were of this type, suggesting some geographic variation. Statistically significant findings included a higher proportion of isolates from female patients (P < 0·01), most marked in the 12–24 months age group (P < 0·05); a higher proportion of infants under 12 months requiring hospital admission compared to older children (P < 0·05); and a greater number of isolates from unvaccinated children (P < 0·01). Analysis of serotype according to four age groups (under 3 months, 3–12 months, 12–24 months and above 2 years) showed statistically significant differences (P < 0·05) with a noticeably lower proportion (38%) of serotype 1,3 in 3–12 months age group and higher prevalence (74%) of serotype 1,3 in the 12–24 months age group. There was no correlation between DNA type and serotype.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 115 , Issue 1 , August 1995 , pp. 101 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

References

1.Cherry, JD, Brunnel, PA, Golden, GS, Karzon, DJ. Report of the task force on pertussis immunisation- 1988. Paediatrics 1988; 91: 939–84.Google Scholar
2.World Health Organisation. Whooping cough 1976 and 1977. World Health Stat Rep 1977; 30: 360–4.Google Scholar
3.Wright, PF. Pertussis in developing countries: definition of the problem and the prospects for control. Rev Infect Dis 1991; 13 (Suppl 6): 528–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Pollock, TM, Miller, E, Lobb, J. Severity of whooping cough in England before and after the decline in pertussis immunisation. Arch Dis Child 1984; 59: 162–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Preston, NW. Bordetella - whooping cough. In: Greenwood, D, Slack, RCB, Peutherer, JF. eds. Medical microbiology. A guide to microbiol infections: pathogenesis, immunity, laboratory diagnosis and control. 14th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1992: 381–8.Google Scholar
6.Fine, PEM. Herd immunity: history, theory, practise. Epidemiol Rev 1993; 15: 265–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Maxwell, S, Preston, NW. Surveillance of pertussis in Britain: 1985–88. Commun Dis Rep 89/34. London: Public Health Laboratory Service. 1989: 3–4.Google Scholar
8.Galbraith, NS, Forbes, P, Mayon-White, RT. Changing patterns of communicable disease in England and Wales. III. Increasing infectious diseases. BMJ 1980; 281: 546–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.White, JM, Leon, S, Begg, NT. ‘COVER’ (Cover of vaccination evaluated rapidly): 27. Commun Dis Rep 1993; 3: R158.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Miller, E, Vurdien, JE, White, JM. The epidemiology of pertussis in England and Wales. Commun Dis Rep 1992; 2: 152–4.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Miller, E, Farrington, CP. The current epidemiology of pertussis in the developed world: UK and West Germany. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 1988; 13 (Suppl): 97–101.Google Scholar
12.Cantor, CL, Smith, CR, Matthews, MK. Pulse-field gel electrophoresis of very large DNA molecules. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1988; 17: 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Khattak, MN, Matthews, RC. Genetic relatedness of Bordetella species as determined by macrorestriction digests resolved by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Int J Sys Bact 1993; 43: 659–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Khattak, MN, Matthews, RC, Burnie, JP. Is Bordetella pertussis clonal? BMJ 1992; 304: 813–15.Google Scholar
15.Preston, NW. Technical problems in the laboratory diagnosis and prevention of whooping cough. Lab Pract 1970; 19: 482–6.Google Scholar
16.Smith, CL, Cantor, CR. Purification, specific fragmentation, and separation of large DNA molecules. Methods Enzymol 1987; 155: 449–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.McClelland, M, Jones, R, Patel, Y, Nelson, N. Restriction endonuclease for pulsed-field mapping of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids 1987; 15: 5985–6005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Smith, CL, Kalco, SR, Cantor, CR. Pulse-field gel electrophoresis and the technology of large DNA molecules. In: Genome analysis. A practical approach. 1st ed. Davis, RE, ed. Oxford: IRL Press, 1988: 41–72.Google Scholar
19.Bryman, A, Cramer, D. Quantitative data analysis for social scientists. Rev Ed London: Routledge, 1994: 1–114.Google Scholar
20. Weekly report of infectious diseases (North West). Bordetella pertussis. North Western Region 92/22. Manchester: Public Health Laboratory Service, 4 06 1993: 3–4.Google Scholar
21.Knowles, K, Lorange, M, Matthews, R, Preston, N. Serotyping of outbreak and vaccine strains of Bordetella pertussis. In: Abstracts of the 33rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, New Orleans, 10 1993. Washington DC: American Society for Microbiology, 1993.Google Scholar
22.Preston, NW. Change in prevalent serotype of pertussis infection in Britain. Lancet 1985; i: 510: 1985.Google Scholar
23.Preston, NW, Carter, EJ. Serotype specificity of vaccine-induced immunity to pertussis. Commun Dis Rep 1992; 2: R155–6.Google ScholarPubMed
24.Booy, R, Aitken, SJ, Taylor-Williams, G et al. , Immunogenicity of combined diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine given at 2, 3 and 4 months versus 3, 4 and 9 months of age. Lancet 1992; 339: 507–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Ramsay, MEB. Corbel, MJ, Readhead, K, Ashworth, LAE, Begg, NT. Persistence of antibody after accelerated immunisation with diphtheria/tetanus/pertussis vaccine. BMJ 1991; 302: 1489–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Wilson, AMM. Bordetella - whooping cough. In: Makie and McCartney. Medical Microbiology. Dugguid, JP, Marmion, BP, Swain, RHA, eds. Volume 1: microbial infections. 13th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1978: 267–71.Google Scholar