Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:27:32.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antibody studies in natural bovine cowpox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Derrick Baxby  and
A. D. Osborne
Derrick Baxby
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool Department of Medical Microbiology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XW
A. D. Osborne
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bristol
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Serological studies on cows recovered from natural cowpox indicated that Haemagglutinin-Inhibiting (HAI) antibody persisted for at least 27 weeks, and Virus Neutralizing (VN) antibody persisted for at least 98 weeks.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , December 1979 , pp. 425 - 428
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

References

Baxby, D. (1972). A comparison of the antigens present on the surface of virus released artificially from chick cells infected with vaccinia virus and cowpox virus and its white pock mutant. Journal of Hygiene 70, 353–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxby, D. (1977 a). Is cowpox misnamed? A review of ten human cases. British Medical Journal i, 1379–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxby, D. (1977 b). Poxvirus hosts and reservoirs. Archives of Virology 55, 169–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boulter, E. A. (1957). The titration of vaccinial neutralizing antibody on chorioallantoic membranes. Journal of Hygiene 55, 502–12.Google Scholar
Downie, A. W. & Kempe, C. H. (1969). Poxviruses. In Diagnostic Procedures for Viral and Rickettsial Infections, pp. 281–320. New York, American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Downie, A. W., St Vincent, L., Goldstein, L., Rao, A. R. & Kempe, C. H. (1969 a). Antibody response in non-haemorrhagic smallpox patients. Journal of Hygiene 67, 609–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Downie, A. W., St Vincent, L., Rao, A. R. & Kempe, C. H. (1969 b). Antibody response following smallpox vaccination and re-vaccination. Journal of Hygiene 67, 603–8.Google Scholar
Dumbell, K. R. & Nizamuddin, M. (1959). An agar gel precipitation test for the laboratory diagnosis of smallpox. Lancet i, 916–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, E. P. J., Johnson, R. H. & Osborne, A. D. (1970). The differential diagnosis of viral skin infections of the bovine teat. Veterinary Record 87, 602–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, E. P. J., Johnson, R. H. & Osborne, A. D. (1972). Field observations on the epidemiology of bovine herpes mammillitis. Veterinary Record 91, 395–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, K., Downie, A. W. & Bradley, W. H. (1958). The antibody response in man following infection with viruses of the pox group. II. Antibody response following vaccination. Journal of Hygiene 56, 466–78.Google ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, K. & Helbert, D. (1960). A comparison of the haemagglutinins of variola, alastrim, vaccinia, cowpox and ectromelia viruses. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 79, 416–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rweyemamu, M. M., Johnson, R. H. & Laurillard, R. E. (1969). Serological findings in bovine herpes mammillitis. British Veterinary Journal 125, 317–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed