Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:10:24.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antibody response in pig nasal fluid and serum following foot-and-mouth disease infection or vaccination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

M. J. Francis  and
L. Black
M. J. Francis
Affiliation:
Wellcome Biotechnology Limited, Wellcome FMD Vaccine Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey
L. Black
Affiliation:
Wellcome Biotechnology Limited, Wellcome FMD Vaccine Laboratory, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nasal fluid and serum collected from pigs after exposure to live foot and mouth disease (FMD) virus or injection of single oil emulsion (w/o) or double oil emulsion (w/o/w) vaccines were examined for FMD neutralizing activity. After virus exposure the response profiles of serum and nasal mucus were similar to one another. In both, neutralizing activity rose to a peak at one to two weeks after exposure and then subsided slowly. After vaccination with either the w/o or w/o/w preparations a neutralizing response was demonstrable in the serum three to seven days after the first injection, and this was boosted by revaccinations 56 and 117 days later. The neutralizing activity was also detectable in nasal fluid seven days after the first vaccination, but subsequent revaccinations 56 and 117 days later provoked neutralizing titres which were no greater than those observed after the initial vaccination.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 91 , Issue 2 , October 1983 , pp. 329 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

References

REFERENCES

Basarab, O. (1978). The protection of fattening pigs against foot-and-mouth disease with an oil-adjuvant vaccine. I. Studies on European foot-and-mouth disease virus strains. Proceedings 5th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress Zagreb, KB 46.Google Scholar
Baskerville, A. & Lloyd, G. (1977). A method for the collection of nasal epithelial cells and secretion from domestic animals. Veterinary Record 101, 108–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capstick, P. B., Garland, A. J. M., Chapman, W. G. & Masters, R. C. (1967). Factors affecting the production of foot-and-mouth disease virus in deep suspension cultures of BHK 21 clone 13 cells. Journal of Hygiene 65, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Castro, M. P. (1964). Behaviour of the foot-and-mouth disease virus in cell cultures: susceptibility of the 1B-RS-2 cell line. Arquivos do Instituto Biólogico (Säo Paulo) 31, 63–78.Google Scholar
Donaldson, A. I. & Ferris, N. P. (1980). The excretion of airborne foot-and-mouth disease virus by pigs: sites of release of virus. Proceedings 6th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress Copenhagen, p. 135.Google Scholar
Figukroa, F., Ohlbaum, A. & Contreras, G. (1973). Neutralizing antibody response in bovine serum and nasal and salivary secretions after immunization with live or inactivated foot-and-mouth disease virus. Infection and Immunity 8, 296–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, M. J., Black, L. & Rweyemamu, M. M. (1981). Neutralising activity in the secretions of cattle and pigs after foot and mouth disease (FMD) infection or vaccination. VIth International Congress of Virology, Strasbourg, France, 176, p. 14/06.Google Scholar
Francis, M. J., Ouldridge, E. J. & Black, L. (1983). Antibody response in bovine pharyngeal fluid following foot-and-mouth disease vaccination and/or exposure to live virus. Research in Veterinary Science. (In the Press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, A. J. M. (1974). Inhibitory activity of secretions in cattle against foot-and-mouth disease virus. Ph.D. thesis, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London.Google Scholar
Golding, S. M., Hedger, R. S., Talbot, P. & Watson, J. (1976). Radial immuno-diffusion and serum-neutralisation techniques for the assay of antibodies to swine vesicular disease. Research in Veterinary Science 20, 142–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyslop, N. St. G. (1965). Secretion of foot-and-mouth disease virus and antibody in the saliva of infected and immunised cattle. Journal of Comparative Pathology 75, 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, M., McKercher, P. D. & Nusbaum, N. E. (1978). Secretory antibody responses in cattle infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus. American Journal of Veterinary Research 39, 1081–1087Google ScholarPubMed
McVicar, J. W. & Sutmoller, P. (1974). Neutralising activity in the serum and oseophagealpharyngeal fluid of cattle after exposure to foot-and-mouth disease virus and subsequent re-exposure. Archiv, für die gesamte Virusforschung 44, 173–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouldridge, K.J., Francis, M. J. & Black, L. (1982). Antibody response of pigs to foot-andmouth disease oil emulsion vaccine: the antibody class involved. Research in Veterinary Science 32, 327–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pay, T. W. F., Telling, R. C., Kitchener, B. L. & Southern, J. (1971). Some observations of foot-and-mouth disease virus inactivation with acetylethyleneimine (AEI). European Commission for the Control of FMD, Meeting of the Research Group Standing Technical Committee, Tubingen.Google Scholar
Pinto, A. A. & Garland, A. J. M. (1979). Immune response to virus-infection-associated (VIA) antigen in cattle repeatedly vaccinated with foot-and-mouth disease virus inactivated by formalin or acetylethyleneimine. Journal of Hygiene 82, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittmann, G. (1972). Attempts to demonstrate secretory antibodies in pigs immune to foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and to immunise pigs intranasally against FMD. Zbl. Vet. Med. B. 19, 779–781.Google Scholar
Wittmann, G., Bauer, K. & Mussgay, M. (1970). Studies on the vaccination of pigs with vaccines of inactivated foot-and-mouth disease virus. 2. Study with ethylethyleneimine (EEI) inactivated virus and diethylamino ethyl dextran (DEAD-D) as an adjuvant. Archiv. für die gesamte Virusforschung 29, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittmann, G., Bauer, K. & Mussgay, M. (1972). Experiments on vaccination of pigs with ethylethyleneimine (EEI) diethylaminoethyl dextran (DEAE-D) foot and mouth disease vaccines. Archiv. für die gesamte Virusforshung 36, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed