Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:04:11.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of lipopolysaccharide antigens of Treponema hyodysenteriae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. J. Hampson ,
J. R. L. Mhoma  and
B. Combs
D. J. Hampson
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Studies, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
J. R. L. Mhoma
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Studies, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
B. Combs
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Studies, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) extracts obtained from Treponema hyodysenteriae of serogroups A, B, D and E, and from T. innocens were examined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), silver-staining, and immunoblotting with hyperimmune rabbit sera. All organisms possessed multiple LPS bands, but their position and number differed.

Immunoblotting of LPS with grouping sera identified three or four major antigenic LPS components in the 10-42 kDa range in all organisms: these components were largely specific to each type-organism of a serogroup, and presumably represented group antigens. Although some minor cross-reactivity occurred between LPS from organisms in the different groups, this was insufficient to merit changes to the current LPS serogrouping system for T. hyodysenteriae. Besides this LPS ‘complex’, other higher-molecular-weight material which appeared to be a common component of the treponemes examined was present in low concentrations. Organisms with different serotypes within a serogroup apparently possessed common LPS bands, but also had unique LPS bands which may account for their serotype specificity. One ‘untypable’ organism lacked group-specific LPS and was thought to be a mutant of a group B organism. The loss of serogroup LPS by the isolate suggested that this material is an external component of the cell wall. The availability of an atypical organism lacking LPS components may facilitate further studies on the pathogenesis of swine dysentery.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 103 , Issue 2 , October 1989 , pp. 275 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

REFERENCES

1.Taylor, DJ, Alexander, TJL.The production of dysentery in swine by feeding cultures containing a spirochaete. Brit Vet J 1971; 127: 58–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Harris, DL, Glock, RD, Christensen, CR, Kinyon, JM.Swine dysentery. I. Inoculation of pigs with Treponema hyodysenteriae (new species) and reproduction of the disease. Vet Med Small Animal Clinician 1972; 67: 61–4.Google Scholar
3.Nussen, ME, Birmingham, JR, Joens, LA.Biological activity of a lipopolvsaccharide extracted from Treponema hyodysenteriae. Infect Immun 1982; 37: 138–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Nuessen, ME, Joens, LA, Glock, RD.Involvement of lipopolysaccharide in the pathogenicity of Treponema hyodysenterioe. J Immunol 1983; 131: 997–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Baum, DH, Joens, LA.Serotypes of beta-haemolytic Treponema hyodysenteriae. Infect Immun 1979; 25: 792–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Mapother, ME, Joens, LA.New serotypes of Treponema hyodysenteriae. J Clin Microbiol 1985; 22: 161–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Hampson, DJ, Mhoma, JRL, Combs, B, Buddle, JR.Proposed revisions to the serological typing system for Treponema hyodysenteriae. Epidemiol Infect 1989; 102: 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Joens, LA, Nord, NA, Kinyon, JM, Egan, IT.Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibody to Treponema hyodysenteriae antigens. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 15: 249–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Parizek, R, Stewart, R, Brown, K, Blevins, D.Protection against swine dysentery with an inactivated Treponema hyodysenteriae bacterin. Vet Med 1985; 80: 80–6.Google Scholar
10.Joens, LA, Whipp, SC, Glock, RD, Nuessen, ME.Serotype-specific protection against Treponema hyodysenteriae infection in ligated colonic loops of pigs recovered from swine dysentery. Infect Immun 1983; 39: 460–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Nuessen, ME, Joens, LA.Serotype-specific opsonization of Treponema hyodysenteriae. Infect Immun 1982; 38: 102–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Chatfield, SN, Fernie, DS, Penn, C, Dougan, G.Identification of the major antigens of Treponema innocens. Infect Immun 1988; 56: 1070–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Laemmli, UK.Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of the bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227: 680–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Towbin, H, Staehelin, T, Gordon, J.Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1979; 76: 4350–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Tsai, CM, Frasch, CE.A sensitive silver strain for detecting lipopolysaccharides in polyacrylamide gels. Analyt Biochem 1982; 119: 115–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hitchcock, PJ, Brown, TM.Morphological heterogeneity among Salmonella lipopolysaccharide chemotypes in silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. J Bact 1983; 154: 269–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Russell, R, Johnson, K.SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of lipopolysaccharides. Canad J Microbiol 1975; 21: 2013–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Combs, B, Hampson, DJ, Mhoma, JRL, Buddle, JR.Typing of Treponema hyodysenteriae by restriction endonuclease analysis. Vet Microbiol 1989: 19: 351–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Zoha, SJ, Carmichael, LE.Properties of Brucella canis antigens associated with colonial mucoidness. Cornell Veterinarian 1981; 71: 428–38.Google Scholar
20.Darveau, RP, Hancock, REW.Procedure for isolation of bacterial lipopolysaccharides from both smooth and rough Pseudomonas aeroginosa and Salmonella typhimurium strains. J Bact 1983: 155: 831–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar