Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:03:58.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Inquiry into the Relation between Social Status and Cancer Mortality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. W. Brown  and
Mohan Lal
J. W. Brown
Affiliation:
From the Statistical Department of the Lister Institute.
Mohan Lal
Affiliation:
From the Statistical Department of the Lister Institute.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Considerable difference of opinion has existed as to whether the incidence of cancer is at all affected by the habits of life of different classes of the community. There is of course no doubt that in certain occupations particular forms of malignant disease are exceptionally prevalent, the case of chimney sweeps being notorious; but the more general question as to the incidence on large groups of occupations has not been so definitely determined. The present research was suggested by the apparently contradictory results obtained by Heron from his study of London statistics, and by Maynard from an analysis of United States data.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , July 1914 , pp. 186 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1914

References

REFERENCES

England, and Wales, 1911 Census of, VII. and X. Pt. 2.Google Scholar
Hamburgischen Staates, Bericht des Medizinalrates über die Hedizinische Statistik des, Years 1906–1912. Hamburg (Voss).Google Scholar
Heron, D. (1906). On the relation of Fertility in Man to Social Status etc. London(Dulau and Co.).Google Scholar
London County Council, Reports of the Medical Officer of Health, for the years 1901 and 1911. London(Southwood, Smith and Co.).Google Scholar
Maynard, G. D. (1910). A Statistical Study in Cancer Death Rates. Biometrika, VII. 1909–10, 276.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1912). On a Correction to be made in the Correlation Ratio η. Bio metrika, VIII. 1911–12, 254.Google Scholar
Registrar-General, Supplement to the 65th Annual Report of, Part II.Google Scholar
Trade, Board of, Report on Enquiry into Earnings and Hours of Labour of Work-people of the United Kingdom, 1906 (Cd. 6556).Google Scholar