Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T14:06:17.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Examination of some Factors influencing the Rate of Infant Mortality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. Greenwood Jr  and
J. W. Brown
M. Greenwood Jr
Affiliation:
Statistician to the Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.
J. W. Brown
Affiliation:
Assistant in the Statistical Laboratory, The Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In all countries which make statistical returns, attention has been directed to the large proportion of children failing to complete one year of life. Even the most highly civilised races lose in this way more than ten per cent, of their potential citizens as will appear from the data contained in the following table (Deutsche Sterbetafeln, 1910).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , May 1912 , pp. 5 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1912

References

Beeton, M. and Pearson, K. (1899). A First Study of Inheritance of Longevity and the Selective Death-Rate. Proc. Roy. Soc. LXV. 290.Google Scholar
Beeton, M. and Pearson, K. (1901). Inheritance of the Duration of Life and the Intensity of Natural Selection in Man. Biometrika, I. 50.Google Scholar
Beeton, M., Pearson, K., and Yule, G. U. (1901). On the Correlation between Duration of Life and the Number of Offspring. Proc. Roy. Soc. LXXVII. 159.Google Scholar
Blakeman, J. (1905). On Tests for Linearity of Regression in Frequency Distributions. Biometrika, IV. 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creighton, C. (1895). A History of Epidemics in Britain. Vol. II. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Elderton, W. Palin (1902). Tables for Testing the Goodness of Fit of Theory to Observation. Biometrika, I. 155.Google Scholar
Eröss, J. (1895). Sterblichkeitsverhältnisse d. Neugeborenen u. Säuglinge. Zeitschr. f. Hygiene u. Infectionskr. XIX. 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzen-Müller, K. (1897). Die Fruchtbarkeits und Sterblichkeitsverhältnisse in sämtlichen Städten Sachsens 1891–5. Zeitschr. d. Sächs. Stat. Bur. XLIII. 142.Google Scholar
Geissler, A. (1885). Ueber den Einfluss d. Säuglingssterblichkeit auf die eheliche Fruchtbarkeit etc. Zeitschr. f. Sächs. Stat. Bur. p. 23.Google Scholar
Groth, and Hahn, (1910). Die Säuglingsverhältnisse in Bayern. München (Lindauer) (Sonderabdr a. d. Zeitschr d. K. Bayer Stat. Landesamts. Jahrg. 1910).Google Scholar
Heron, D. (1906). On the Relation of Fertility in Man to Social Status etc. London (Dulau).Google Scholar
Heron, D. (1907). A First Study of the Statistics of Insanity etc. London (Dulau).Google Scholar
Heron, D. (1910). On the Probable Error of a Partial Correlation Coefficient. Biometrika, VII. 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Local Government Board (1910). Supplement to the Report of the Board's Medical Officer. Cd. 5263.Google Scholar
Malthus, T. R. (1817). An Essay on the Principle of Population. 5th Edition, London.Google Scholar
Massachusetts (1896). Report of State Board of Health.Google Scholar
Milan, (1908). La Mortalita infantile in Milano.Google Scholar
Mombert, P. (1907). Studien zur Bevölkerungsbewegung in Deutschland. Karlsruhe (Braun).Google Scholar
Neumann, F. J. (1893). Zur Lehre von den Lohnengesetzen (4) Pauperismus u. Kindersterblichkeit. Jahrb. f. Nationalökon. 3rd Series, V. 617.Google Scholar
Newman, G. (1906). Infant Mortality, A Social Problem. London.Google Scholar
Newsholme, A. (1911). The Declining Birth-rate, Its National and International Significance. London (Cassell).Google Scholar
Newsholme, A. and Stevenson, T. H. C. (1906). The Decline of Human Fertility in the United Kingdom and Other Countries as shown by Corrected Birth Rates. Journ. Roy. Stat. Soc. LXIX.Google Scholar
Niceforo, A. (1911). Contribution à l'étude des Correlations entre le Bienêtre économique et quelques Faits de la Vie démographique. Journ. d. l. Soc. d. Stat. d. Paris, p. 322.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1903). On the Influence of Natural Selection on the Variability and Correlation of Organs. Phil. Trans. A. cc. 1.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1905). On the General Theory of Skew Correlation and Non-Linear Regression. London (Dulau).Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1907). A First Study of the Statistics of Pulmonary Tuberculosis. London (Dulau).Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1909). The Problem of Practical Eugenics. London (Dulau).Google Scholar
Pearson, K. and Filon, L. N. G. (1898). On the Probable Errors of Frequency Constants. Phil. Trans. A. CXCI. 229.Google Scholar
Powys, A. O. (1901 and 1905). Data for the Problem of Evolution in Man. Biometrika, I. 30 and IV. 233.Google Scholar
Prinzing, F. (1906). Handbuch der Medizinischen Statistik. Jena (Fischer).Google Scholar
Rowntree, R. S. (1902). Poverty: a Study of Town Life. London.Google Scholar
Saltet, R. H. and Falkenburg, P. H. (1907). Kindersterblichkeit besonders in den Niederlanden. Amsterdam (Müller).Google Scholar
Schuster, E. (1905). Hereditary Deafness. Biometrika, IV. 465.Google Scholar
Seutemann, K. (1909). Oeffentliche Säuglingsfürsorge und Sterblichkeitsstatistik. Jahrb. f. Nationalökonom. u. Stat. XXXVII. 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbergleit, H. (1897). Kindersterblichkeit in Europ. Grossstädten. Arb. d. VIII. Int. Cong. f. Hyg. u. Demog. Budapest.Google Scholar
Snow, E. C. (1911). The Intensity of Natural Selection in Man. London (Dulau).Google Scholar
Sterbetafeln (1910). Deutsche Sterbetafeln f. das Jahrzehnt 1891 bis 1900. Berlin.Google Scholar
Stuart, Verrijn (1901). Untersuch. ü. d. Bezieh. Wohlstand etc. und Kinder-sterb. in den Nierderlanden. Zeitschr. f. Sozialwissen. IV. 649.Google Scholar
Suisse, Statistique de la (1901). CXXVIII. 35.Google Scholar
Vogl, A. von (1909). Die Sterblichkeit der Säuglinge in ihrem Territorialen Verhalten etc. München, 1909 (Lehmann).Google Scholar
Wäppaus, J. E. (1859–1861). Allgemeine Bevölkerungsstatistik. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Weinberg, W. (1910). Die Rassenhyg. Bedeutung der Fruchtbarkeit. Archiv f. Rassenhyg. u. Gesellschaftsbiol. VII. 684.Google Scholar
Welton, T. A. (1911). England's Recent Progress. London (Chapman and Hall).Google Scholar
Wernicke, J. (1889). Das Verhältnis z. Geborenen u. Gestorbenen in Hist. Entwickelung. Jena (Fischer).Google Scholar
Westergaard, H. (1901). Die Lehre von der Mortalität und Morbidität. Jena (Fischer).Google Scholar
Westminster Health Society (1910). Sixth Annual Report of the City of Westminster Health Society. London (Riordan).Google Scholar
Würzburg, A. (1887). Die Säuglingssterblichkeit im Deutschen Reiche etc. Arbeit. a. d. Kaiser. Gesundheitsamte, II. 208 and 343.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1907). The Theory of Normal Correlation for any Number of Variables, etc. Proc. Roy. Soc. A. LXXIX. 182.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1911). An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. London (Griffin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar