Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:50:20.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of commercially available dehydrated Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for the isolation of salmonellae from poultry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

C. R. Fricker ,
Elaine Quail ,
Loraine McGibbon  and
R. W. A. Girdwood
C. R. Fricker
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow G21 3UW
Elaine Quail
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow G21 3UW
Loraine McGibbon
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow G21 3UW
R. W. A. Girdwood
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, Stobhill General Hospital, Glasgow G21 3UW
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A total of 745 samples of chicken giblets was cultured to determine the relative efficiency of a commercially available Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium (RV-Oxoid). Experiments to determine the optimum inoculation ratio showed that 1:100 was superior to the other ratios tested. Comparison of RV-Oxoid with standard RV and RV-medium prepared using soya peptone (RV-soya) showed that after 24 h RV-soya was significantly better than RV-Oxoid (P < 0·05), although there was no significant difference between standard RV and RV-Oxoid. Furthermore, when the duration of incubation was extended to 48 h there was no significant difference between the three media (P > 0·25).

We conclude that RV-Oxoid is a satisfactory product for the isolation of salmoncllae from poultry, providing that it is inoculated at a ratio of 1:100 and is incubated for 48h. Its use can therefore be recommended to laboratories who wish to use a dehydrated medium.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , October 1985 , pp. 337 - 344
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

References

REFERENCES

Alcaide, E., Martinez, J. P. & Garay, E. (1984). Comparative study on Salmonella isolation from sewage-contaminated natural waters. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 56, 305–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alcaide, E., Martinez, J. P., Martinez-Germes, P. & Gahay, E. (1982). Improved Salmonella recovery from moderate to highly polluted waters. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 53, 143–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collard, P. & Unwin, M. (1958). A trial of Rappaport's medium. Journal of Clinical Pathology 11, 420–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edel, W. & Kampelmacher, E. H. (1973). Comparative studies on the isolation of suhlethally injured salmonellae in nine European lahoratories. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 48, 107–174.Google Scholar
Fricker, C. R. (1984 a). A comparison of methods for the isolation of salmonellae from sewage sludge. Zentralblatt für Bakterilogie, Mikrobiologie und Hygiene (I. Alt. Originah B.) 179, 170–178.Google ScholarPubMed
Fricker, C. R. (1984 b). A comparison of isolation procedures for salmonellas from polluted water using two forms of Rappaport's medium. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 56, 305–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fricker, C. R. & Girdwood, R. W. A. (1984). The effect of the use of different selective media on the ability to recover salmoncllae from seagull faeces. Journal of Hygiene 93, 35–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fricker, C. R. & Girdwood, R. W. A. (1985). A note on tho isolation of salmonellas from environmental samples using three formulations of Rappaport's broth. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 58, 343–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fricker, C. R., Girdwood, R. W. A. & Munro, D. (1983). A comparison of enrichment media for tho isolation of salmonellae from seagull cloacal swabs. Journal of Hygiene 91, 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1980). Salmonella isolation with Rappaport's medium after pre-enrichment in buffered peptone water using a series of inoculum ratios. Journal of Hygiene 85, 125–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1983). A comparison of two modifications of Rappaport's enrichment medium (R25 and RV) for the isolation of salmonellas from sewage polluted natural water. Journal of Hygiene 91, 451–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S., Price, T. H. & Xirouchaki, E. (1979). Comparison of selenite F, Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate and Rappaport's medium for the isolation of salmonellas from sewage-polluted natural water using a pre-enrichment technique. Journal of Hygiene 83, 451–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, W. L. & Jenkins, H. R. (1965). An evaluation of Rappaport's magnesium chloride malacite green medium in the routine examination of faeces. Journal of Hygiene 63, 491–495.Google ScholarPubMed
Iveson, J. B., Kovacs, N. & Laurie, W. (1964). An improved method of isolating salmoncllae from contaminated coconut. Journal of Clinical Pathology 17, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jameson, J. E. (1961). A study of tetrathionate enrichment techniques with particular reference to two new modifications used in isolating salmoncllae from sewage swabs. Journal of Hygiene 59, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jameson, J. E. (1963). A note on the isolation of salmonellae. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 26, 112–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGibbon, L., Quail, E. & Fricker, C. R. (1984). Isolation of salmonellae using two forms of Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium and brilliant green agar. International Journal of Food Microbiology 1, 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papadakis, J. A. & Efstratiou, M. A. (1980). Isolation of salmonellae from vegetables with the use of Rappaportr-Vassiliadis magnesium chloride-malachite green enrichment medium. Hippocrates 5, 1–5.Google Scholar
Rappaport, F. & Konforti, N. (1959). Selective enrichment medium for paratyphoid bacteria. Inhibitory and growth promoting factors. Applied Microbiology 7, 63–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rappaport, F., Konforti, N. & Navon, B. (1956). A new enrichment medium for certain salmoncllae. Journal of Clinical Pathology 9, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, R. (1964). An assessment of the relative efficiency of several media in the isolation of shigellao and salmonellae from faeces. Indian Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 7, 93–101.Google Scholar
Van Schothorst, M. & Renaud, A. M. (1983). Dynamics of Salmonella isolation with modified Rappaport's medium. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 54, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vassiliadis, P. (1983). The Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) enrichment medium for the isolation of salmonellas: an overview. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 54, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vassiliadis, P., Trichopoulos, D., Papadakis, G. & Politi, G. (1970). Salmonella isolations in abattoirs in Greece. Journals of Hygiene 68, 601–609.Google ScholarPubMed
Vassiliadis, P., Pateraki, E., Papaiconomou, N., Papadakis, J. A. & Trichopoulos, D. (1976). Nouveau procédé d'enrichissiment de Salmonella. Annales de Microbiologic (Instilut Pasteur) 127 B, 195–200.Google Scholar
Vassiliadis, P., Trichopoulos, D., Kalapothai, V., Papadakis, J. & Serie, C. H. (1979). Isolement de salmonelles á partir de matieres fécales de pores apparamment sains, avec le nouveau procédé d'enrichisscment R10/43 °C. Recuiel de Médicine Véténaire 155, 550–566.Google Scholar
Vassiliadis, P., Kalapothaki, V., Mavrommati, C. H. & Trichopoulos, D. (1984). A comparison of the original Rappaport medium (R medium) and the Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium (RV medium) in the isolation of salmonellae from meat products. Journal of Hygiene 93, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D. C. & Walker, A. P. (1978). A modification of brilliant green agar for improved isolation of Salmonella. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 45, 105–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed