Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:27:19.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Analysis of 510 Strains of Corynebacterium Diphtheriae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

H. S. Carter
Affiliation:
From the Corporation of Glasgow Public Health Laboratory.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Since Anderson, Happold, McLeod and Thomson (1931) described their division of the varieties of Corynebacterium diphtheriae into three groups—gravis, intermediate and mitis—and submitted correlations with clinical types of diphtheria, several workers have published results of investigations which, for the most part, are against such a hard and fast classification.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1933

References

Anderson, J. S., Cooper, K. E., Happold, F. C. and McLeod, J. W. (1933). J. Path. and Bact. 36, 169; also Lancet, i, 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. S., Happold, F. C., McLeod, J. W. and Thomson, J. G. (1931). J. Path. and Bact. 34, 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, A. J. and Baxter, E. M. (1923). J. Hygiene, 22, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, E. W. (1928). Text Book of Infectious Diseases. London.Google Scholar
Hammerschmidt, J. (1924). Deutsche med. Wehnschr. 50, 1831; also Zentralbl. f. Bakt. I. Abt., Orig. 93, 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menton, J. (1932). J. Path. and Bact. 35, 651.Google Scholar
Menton, J., Cooper, T. V., Duke, F. W. and Fussell, W. H. (1933).J Hygiene, 33, 414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, W. C. (Junr.) and Knacke, F. E. D. (1928). J. Bact. 15, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parish, J. H., Whatley, E. E. and O'Brien, R. A. (1932). Brit. Med. J. ii, 915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, H. A. and Rankin, A. L. K. (1932). Lancet, ii, 884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar