Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:39:46.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An 18 year clinical review of septic arthritis from tropical Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

D. S. Morgan
Affiliation:
Division of Medicine, Royal Darwin Hospital, Northern Territory
D. Fisher
Affiliation:
Division of Medicine, Royal Darwin Hospital, Northern Territory
A. Merianos
Affiliation:
Disease Control Centre and Menzies School of Health Research, Royal Darwin Hospital, Northern Territory
B. J. Currie*
Affiliation:
Division of Medicine, Royal Darwin Hospital, Northern Territory Disease Control Centre and Menzies School of Health Research, Royal Darwin Hospital, Northern Territory
*
* Correspondence and requests for reprints: Assoc. Prof. B. J. Currie, Menzies School of Health Research, P.O. Box 41096, Casuarina, NT 0811, Australia.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A retrospective study of 191 cases of septic arthritis was undertaken at Royal Darwin Hospital in the tropical north of Australia. Incidence was 9·2 per 100000 overall and 29·1 per 100000 in Aboriginal Australians (RR 6·6; 95% CI 5·0–8·9). Males were affected more than females (RR 1·6; 95% CI 1·2–2·1). There was no previous joint disease or medical illness in 54%. The commonest joints involved were the knee (54%) and hip (13%). Significant age associations were infected hips in those under 15 years and infected knees in those over 45 years. Seventy-two percent of infections were haematogenous. Causative organisms included Staphylococcus aureus (37%), Streptococcus pyogenes (16%) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (12%). Unusual infections included three melioidosis cases. Polyarthritis occurred in 17%, with N. gonorrhoeae (11/23) more likely to present as polyarthritis than other organisms (22/168) (OR 6·0; 95% CI 2·1–16·7). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed the hip to be at greater risk for S. aureus than other joints. Open arthrotomy was a more successful treatment procedure than arthroscopic washout or needle aspiration.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

References

1.Goldenberg, DL, Reed, JI. Bacterial arthritis. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 764–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Cooper, C, Cawley, MID. Bacterial arthritis in an English health district: a 10 year review. Ann Rheum Dis 1986; 45: 458–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Esterhai, JL, Gelb, I. Adult septic arthritis. Orthop Clin North Am 1991; 22: 503–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Peters, RHJ, Rasker, JJ, Jacobs, JWG, Prevo, RL, Karthaus, RP. Bacterial arthritis in a district hospital. Clin Rheumatol 1992; 11: 351–5.Google Scholar
5.Ho, G, Su, EY. Therapy for septic arthritis. JAMA 1982; 247: 797800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Klein, MD. Joint infection, with consideration of underlying disease and sources of bacteremia in he-matogenous infection. Clin Geriatr Med 1988; 4: 375–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Dubost, JJ, Fis, I, Denis, P et al. , Polyarticular septic arthritis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1993; 72: 296310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Youssef, PP, York, JR. Septic arthritis: a second decade of experience. Aust NZ J Med 1994; 24: 307–11.Google Scholar
9.Meijers, KAE, Dijkmans, BAC, Hermans, J, van den Broek, PJ, Cats, A. Non-gonococcal infectious arthritis: a retrospective study. J Infect 1987; 14: 1320.Google Scholar
10.Currie, B. Medicine in tropical Australia. Med J Aust 1993; 158: 609–15.Google Scholar
11.Thompson, NJ. Recent trends in Aboriginal mortality. Med J Aust 1991; 154: 235–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Munoz, E, Powers, JR, Nienhuys, TG, Mathews, JD. Social and environmental factors in 10 Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory: relationship to hospital admissions of children. Med J Aust 1992; 156: 529–33.Google Scholar
13.Dean, AG, Dean, JA, Burton, AH, Dicker, RC. Epi Info, Version 5: a word processing, database, and statistical program for epidemiology on microcomputers. USD, Incorporated, Stone Mountain, Georgia, 1990.Google Scholar
14. EGRET Software, Version 1. Seattle: Statistics and Epidemiology Research Corporation, 1993.Google Scholar
15.Taplin, D, Lansdale, L, Allen, AM, Rodrigueze, R, Cortes, A. Prevalence of streptococcal pyoderma in relation to climate and hygiene. Lancet 1973; i: 501–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Shulman, G, Waugh, TR. Acute bacterial arthritis in the adult. Orthop Rev 1988; 17: 955–60.Google Scholar
17.Kortekangas, P, Aro, HT, Tuominen, J, Toivanen, A. Synovial fluid leukocytosis in bacterial arthritis vs. reactive arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in the adult knee. Scand J Rheumatol 1992; 21: 283–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Bowden, FJ, Sheppard, C, Currie, B. HIV in Australia's Northern Territory: Current disease patterns and predictions for the future. Venereology 1994; 7: 50–5.Google Scholar
19.Leelarasamee, A, Bovorakitti, S. Melioidosis: review and update. Rev Infect Dis 1989; 11: 413–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Nakata, MM, Silvers, JH, George, WL. Group G streptococcal arthritis. Arch Intern Med 1983; 143: 1328–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Ho, G. How best to drain an infected joint. Will we ever know for certain? J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 2001–3.Google ScholarPubMed