Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T02:26:45.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age and secular distributions of virus-proven influenza patients in successive epidemics 1961–1976 in Cirencester: Epidemiological significance discussed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

R. E. Hope-Simpson
R. E. Hope-Simpson
Affiliation:
Epidemiological Research Unit, 86 Dyer Street, Cirencester, Gloucestershire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A general practice population of around 3900, under continuous clinical and laboratory surveillance, experienced 20 outbreaks of influenza between March 1960 and March 1976. Four epidemics were caused by subtype H2N2 type A viruses, seven by subtype H3N2 type A viruses and nine outbreaks by type B viruses. The age of every person proved virologically to have influenza is related to the age structure of the community and to the phase of the epidemic in which the virus-positive specimens were collected. Children 0–15 years old suffered a higher incidence rate than adults 16–90±. Pre-school children 0–4 suffered the highest rate of infection by viruses of both influenza A subtypes, whereas older schoolchildren 10–15 suffered the highest rate of type B infections. Despite these high incidence rates neither pre-school nor schoolchildren appear to have been the major disseminators of any of these influenza viruses in the community.

Adults of all ages suffered a high rate of infection even into extreme old age, and the indiscriminate age distribution among adults was sustained in the successive epidemics. Such age-patterns are not those caused by a highly infectious immunizing virus surviving by means of direct transmissions from the sick, whose prompt development of the disease continues endless chains of transmissions. An alternative epidemic mechanism – whereby the virus does not spread from the sick but becomes latent in them, reactivating seasonally so that they later infect their companions – would produce age patterns similar to those recorded here for influenza patients. The suggested mechanism is illustrated by a simple conceptual model and the influenzal age patterns are discussed in relation to the recycling of influenza A subtypes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 92 , Issue 3 , June 1984 , pp. 303 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

References

Banatvala, J. E., Reiss, B. B., Anderson, T. B. & Nitkin, B. C. (1965). Asian influenza in 1963 in two general practices in Cambridge, England. Canadian Medical Association Journal 93, 593–597.Google ScholarPubMed
Bartlett, M. (1957). Measles periodicity and community size. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General) 120, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, F. M. (1977). Reflections on the epidemiology of Myxovirus infections. Medical Microbiology & Immunology 164, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, L. E., Caldwell, G. G., Lynch, R. E., Bailey, R. E. & Chin, T. D. Y. (1970). Hong-Kong influenza: the epidemiologic features of a high school family study analyzed and compared with a similar study during the 1957 Asian influenza epidemic. American Journal of Epidemiology 92, 240–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dingle, J. H., Badger, G. F. & Jordan, W. S. Jr (1964). Illness in the Home, pp. 179–180 and 187. Cleveland: Press of Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
Francis, T. Jr (1953). Influenza: the Newe Acquayantance. Annals of Internal Medicine 39, 203–221.Google Scholar
Glezen, W. P. & Couch, R. B. (1978). Interpandemic influenza in the Houston Area, 1974–1976. New England Journal of Medicine 298, 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glezen, W. P., Couch, R. B., Taber, L. H., Paredes, A., Allison, J. E., Frank, A. L. & Aldridge, C. (1980). Epidemiologic observations of influenza B virus infections in Houston, Texas, 1976–1977. American Journal of Epidemiology 111, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glezen, W. P., Couch, R. B. & Six, H. R. (1982). The influenza herald wave. American Journal of Epidemiology 116, 589–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, C. E., Cooney, M. K. & Fox, J. P. (1973). The Seattle Virus Watch. IV. Comparative epidemiologic observations of infections with influenza A and B viruses, 1968–69, in families with young children. American Journal of Epidemiology 98, 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope-Simpson, R. E. (1951). Influenza 1951. Discussion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 44, 798–800.Google Scholar
Hope-Simpson, R. E. (1952). Infectiousness of communicable disease in the household. Lancet ii, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope-Simpson, R. E. (1970). First outbreak of Hong Kong influenza in a general practice populaton in Great Britain. A field and laboratory study. British Medical Journal 3, 74–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope-Simpson, R. E. (1972). Protection conferred by natural ‘Asian’ H2N2 influenza virus infection against natural infection by ‘Hong Kong’ H3N2 virus. British Medical Journal 4, 490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope-Simpson, R. E. (1979). Epidemic mechanisms of type A influenza. Journal of Hygiene 83, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hope-Simpson, R. E. (1981). The role of season in the epidemiology of influenza. Journal of Hygiene 86, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hope-Simpson, R. E. & Higgins, P. G. (1969). A respiratory virus study in Great Britain: review and evaluation. In Progress in Medical Virology, vol. 11 (ed. Melnick, J. L.), pp. 354–405.Google ScholarPubMed
Hope-Simpson, R. E. & Sutherland, I. (1954). Does influenza spread within the household? Lancet i, 721–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendal, A. P., Goldfield, M., Noble, G. R. & Dowdle, W. R. (1977). Identification and preliminary antigenic analysis of swine influenza-like viruses isolated during an influenza outbreak at Fort Dix, New Jersey. Journal of Infectious Disease 136, 381–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masurel, N. & Hejtink, R. A. (1983). Recycling of H1N1 influenza A virus in man – a haemagglutinin antibody study. Journal of Hygiene 90, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masurel, N. & Marine, W. M. (1973). Recycling of Asian and Hong Kong influenza A virus hemagglutinins in man. American Journal of Epidemiology 97, 44–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monto, A. S., Davenport, F. M., Napier, J. A. & Francis, T. Jr (1969). Quoted in The Influenza Viruses and Influenza (ed. Kilbourne, E. D.), pp. 378 and 525–526. New York, 1975.Google Scholar
Nakajima, K., Desselberger, U. & Palese, P. (1978) Recent human influenza A (H1N1) viruses are closely related genetically to strains isolated in 1950. Nature 274, 334–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panum, P. L. (1940). Observations made during the Epidemic of Measles on the Faroe Islands in the year 1846. New York: American Publishing Association.Google Scholar
Philip, R. N., Bell, J. A., Davis, D. J., Beem, M. O., Beigelman, P. M., Engler, J. I., Mellin, G. W., Johnson, J. H. & Lerner, A. M. (1961). Epidemiological studies of influenza in familial and general population groups, 1951–1956. American Journal of Hygiene 73, 123–137.Google ScholarPubMed
Sarateanu, D. E. & Ehrengut, W. (1976). Seroimmunity against influenza (Hamburg, 1974/75). Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 101, 130–132.Google Scholar
Smith, T. L., Angulo, J. J., Tsokos, J. O. & Tsokos, C. P. (1979). An analysis of the influence of age of school attendance status on the spread of variola minor. Journal of Theoretical Biology 76, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed