Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:39:27.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aerosol infection of animals with strains of Legionella pneumophila of different virulence: comparison with intraperitoneal and intranasal routes of infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

R. B. Fitzgeorge
Affiliation:
PHLS Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire
A. Baskerville
Affiliation:
PHLS Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire
M. Broster
Affiliation:
Ministry of Defence Chemical Defence Establishment, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire
P. Hambleton
Affiliation:
PHLS Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire
P. J. Dennis
Affiliation:
PHLS Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Infection of guinea-pigs by intranasal (i.n.) instillation of 109 viable organisms of two newly isolated strains of Legionella pneumophila (74/81, serogroup 1; 166/81, serogroup 3) did not induce disease, but 104 organisms administered as a small particle aerosol (< 5 μm diameter) produced a fatal widespread bronchopneumonia within 3 days. Milder illness and less extensive bronchopneumonia were also produced in rhesus monkeys and marmosets by one of these two strains (74/81). Mice were resistant to induction of disease by aerosols of both these two strains, though organisms did persist in the lungs for at least 4 days. Both of these L. pneumophila strains were pathogenic for guinea-pigs by aerosol infection over a wide range of doses but the serogroup 1 type strain (NCTC 11192) was not. There was no mortality after infection of guinea-pigs by intranasal instillation of any of these strains but all proved to be fatal after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of large doses. Guinea-pigs, rhesus monkeys and marmosets exposed to aerosol infection with L. pneumophila provide relevant models for studying the pathogenesis of Legionnaires' disease.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

References

REFERENCES

Baskerville, A., Fitzgeorge, R. B., Broster, M., Hambleton, P. & Dennis, P. J. (1981). Experimental transmission of Legionnaires' disease by exposure to aerosols of Legionella pneumophila. Lancet ii, 13891390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskerville, A., Fitzgeorge, R. B., Broster, M. & Hambleton, P. (In the Press.) Histopathology of experimental Legionnaires' disease in guinea pigs, rhesus monkeys and marmosets. Journal of Pathology.Google Scholar
Berendt, R. F., Young, H. W., Allen, R. G. & Knutsen, G. L. (1980). Dose response of guinea pigs experimentally infected with aerosols of Legionella pneumophila. Journal of Infectious Diseases 141, 186192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandler, F. W., McDade, J. E., Hicklin, M. D., Blackmon, J. A., Thomason, B. M. & Ewing, E. P. (1979). Pathological findings in guinea-pigs inoculated intraperitoneally with the Legionnaires' disease bacterium. Annals of Internal Mediciyie 90, 671675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Druett, H. A. (1969). A mobile form of the Henderson apparatus. Journal of Hygiene 67, 437449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edelstein, P. H. (1981). Improved semi-selective medium for isolation of Legionella pneumophila from contaminated clinical and environmental specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 14, 298303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fliermans, C. B., Cherry, W. B., Orrison, L. H. & Thacker, L. (1979). Isolation of Legionella pneumophilafrom non-epidemic related aquatic habitats. Applied Environmental Microbiology 37, 12391242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, T. H., Gregg, M. B., Berman, B., Mallison, G., Rhodes, W. W. Jr & Kassanoff, I. (1978). Pontiac fever: an epidemic of unknown etiology in a health department. I. Clinical and epidemiologic aspects. American Journal of Epidemiology 107, 149160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyton, A. C. (1947). Measurement of the respiratory volumes of laboratory animals. American Journal of Physiology 150, 7077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, G. J. & Morton, J. D. (1953). The respiratory retention of bacterial aerosols: experiments with radioactive spores. Journal of Hygiene 51, 372385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, D. W. (1952). An apparatus for the study of airborne infection. Journal of Hygiene 50, 5368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lattimer, G. L. & Ormsbee, R. A. (1981). In Legionnaires' Disease, pp. 2728. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
McDade, J. E. & Shepard, C. C. (1979). Virulent to avirulent conversion of Legionnaires' disease bacterium (Legionella pneumophila). Its effect on isolation techniques. Journal of Infectious Diseases 139, 707711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MRC (1974). The Accreditation and Recognition Schemes for Supplies of Laboratory Animals. Medical Research Council Laboratory Animals Centre, Manual Series no. 1. Carshalton, Surrey.Google Scholar
Ormsbee, R. A., Peacock, M. G., Lattimer, G. L., Page, L. A. & Fiset, P. (1981). A comparison of some biological characteristics of the Legionnaires' disease bacterium. Annals of Clinical Laboratory Science 11, 5362.Google ScholarPubMed
Tobin, J. O'H., Bartlett, C. L. R. & Waitkins, S. A. (1981). Legionnaires' disease: further evidence to implicate water storage systems as sources. British Medical Journal 282, 573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tobin, J. O'H., Beare, J. & Dunhill, M. S. (1980). Legionnaires' disease in transplant unit: isolation of the causative agent from baths. Lancet ii, 118121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, J. O'H., Swann, R. A. & Bartlett, C. L. R. (1981). Isolation of Legionella pneumophila from water systems; method and preliminary results. British Medical Journal 282, 515517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed