Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-w7rtg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T22:47:46.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Three Decades of the CEP Credential and Environmental Professional Certification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Robert A. Michaels*
Affiliation:
RAM TRAC Corporation
*
Address correspondence to: Robert A. Michaels, President, RAM TRAC Corporation, 3100 Rosendale Road, Schenectady, NY 12309; (phone) 518-785-0976; (email)[email protected]
Get access

Extract

Environmental professional certification programs evolved from earlier forms of validation, including apprenticeships, training programs, education programs, and licensing. During the Industrial Revolution, would-be professional artists and artisans apprenticed themselves to practitioners who had earned a favorable reputation. Generations of mentors and students proved themselves by practicing their trades, and, if they did what they did well, they did well. Our Information Age, however, has imposed new requirements on many practitioners. Beyond training, they might need certificates attesting to training, degrees attesting to learning, and licenses allowing them to practice. The Information Age, ironically, was compensating for information inadequacy, as the number of practitioners and specialties grew and as the distances over which practitioners were recruited expanded more rapidly than word of mouth and thus more rapidly than reputation.

Type
NEWS & INFORMATION
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[ABCEP] Academy of Board Certified Environmental Professionals. 2005. Bylaws. ABCEP, Towson, MD, 17 pp.Google Scholar
Michaels, R. A. 1996. Airborne Particle Excursions Contributing to Daily Average Particle Levels May Be Managed via a One-Hour Standard, with Possible Public Health Benefits. Aerosol Science and Technology 25(4):437444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, R. A. 1997. Particulate Matter Policy [Letter]. Science 278(5344):1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, R. A. 1998. Permissible Daily Airborne Particle Mass Levels Encompass Brief Excursions to the “London Fog” Range, Which May Contribute to Daily Mortality and Morbidity in Communities. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 13(6):385–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaels, R. A., and Kleinman, M. T.. 2000. Incidence and Apparent Health Significance of Brief Airborne Particle Excursions. Aerosol Science and Technology 32(2):93105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar